What's new

Another 52 week high for AMR stock

Here's another reason one exec was selling his stock last month. Also notice that he's not planning to stick around until the non-bonus plan pays out in April.

Code:
SPECIAL JETWIRE FOR MONDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2006 – PLEASE POST

--- AMR ANNOUNCES DEPARTURE OF CFO JAMES BEER ---

AMR Corporation, parent company of American Airlines, announced today that James Beer, the company's senior vice president and chief financial officer, will leave the company to take a position with Symantec, a software company based in Northern California.

"James has been a great team player, exceptional leader and good friend. He played a key role in the progress we've made under our Turnaround Plan and will be missed," said Gerard Arpey, AMR Chairman and CEO. 
 
Beer became AMR's chief financial officer in December 2003 after serving in various leadership roles in his 15-year tenure with American. 

Arpey said that the company will begin a search for a successor immediately. Beer will remain with the company through February.

"While it is always disappointing to unexpectedly lose an executive of James' exceptional capabilities and leadership, American continues to have one of the strongest management teams in the industry, including a very strong finance department. Given that, we expect a smooth transition.

"We wish James every success in his new position," said Arpey. "Our focus now will be to select a leader who will help us build on the great progress we've made."
 
Here's another reason one exec was selling his stock last month. Also notice that he's not planning to stick around until the non-bonus plan pays out in April.

Maybe he sees the writing on the wall 😉
 
Steven Baumert is (or was) an AA flight attendant married to another AA flight attendant. His opinions are not exactly the most unbiased, nor are they even remotely objective in nature. Unlike other airline employees who also do financial advising as a side profession, he never seems to disclose that connection when giving "advice" regarding AMR.

Here is some more bias from Steve.

I think AMR is more full of sit or out of touch with reality 😀

When Does 7.5% = 36%?

In the latest issue of AMR’s publication for employees, Flagship News, AMR management declared that one of its financial objectives is a net profit margin of 7.5%. How lofty is this goal?

My research went as far back as 1987. Since then, the highest profit margin AMR has recorded was in 1998, a year in which:

1. The US had a booming economy and American Airlines had pricing power over business passengers, as well as leisure travelers via a byzantine fare structure.

2. AMR spent 73% less on fuel than it did in 2005.

3. AMR recorded a $1.3 billion profit.

Given that in 1998 the good times were obviously rolling for AMR (and they’re certainly not rolling now), you’d think its profit margin for that year would be a heckuva lot higher than its newly created goal of 7.5%.

Well, you’d be wrong. AMR’s profit margin for 1998 was 6.8%.

Using AMR’s 2005 numbers, just what would it take for the company to achieve a 7.5% profit margin? As everyone knows a commercial airline’s two largest expenses by far are fuel and wages and benefits.

Therefore, AMR would have to spend 43% less on fuel in order to hit a 7.5% margin. Put another way, crude oil prices will have to drop into the $35 range and stay there for the company to make its goal. Seeing that oil prices are in the $60 per barrel area and demand from China, India and the US are growing, not declining; it seems highly unlikely that AMR management can hit 7.5% via monstrously lower fuel prices.

So, we come to AMR’s employees and their wages and benefits. Put bluntly, AMR management can hit its 7.5% target if its workforce agrees to cut its own wages and benefits by a whopping 36%.

This begs the question: Is management's 7.5% profit margin target a realistic goal or a tool to be used to extract further concessions from AMR’s unions?

Anyway, now you know when 7.5% = 36%.



Steven Baumert, Baumert Capital Advisors

baumertcapital@hotmail.com

The author is the principal of Baumert Capital Advisors, an Allen, Texas based investment consulting firm. The preceding should not be construed as advice to buy or sell any security and is intended for informational purposes only.
 
Funny how he focuses soley on expenses, and doesn't discuss revenue at all.

Revenue has been steadily improving despite fuel, so if that momentum continues, I wouldn't expect Baumert's math or assumptions to hold up very well.
 
Funny how he focuses soley on expenses, and doesn't discuss revenue at all.

Revenue has been steadily improving despite fuel, so if that momentum continues, I wouldn't expect Baumert's math or assumptions to hold up very well.


Well, Well, maybe we can start talking revenue instead of just expenses, when Corporate Management wants to compare maintenance to MRO's?

I believe expenses and revenue are both included when calculating a profit margin.
 
I believe expenses and revenue are both included when calculating a profit margin.

Yep. But Baumert only focuses on the two cost drivers, and offers solutions affecting those parts of the equations.

A decent analyst would comment on the revenue environment as well before making assumptions that 7.5% margin is unattainable. Jamie Baker is downright obsessive when it comes to balancing expense with current pricing.
 
assumptions that 7.5% margin is unattainable

If you think it is I want what youre smokin :blink:
Unattainable is an understatement
I like when pigs fly much better

A 7.5 percent profit margin is as attainable as the twu getting back our pay and benefits :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
If you think it is I want what youre smokin :blink:
Unattainable is an understatement
I like when pigs fly much better

A 7.5 percent profit margin is as attainable as the twu getting back our pay and benefits :lol: :lol: :lol:

Not really -- revenue in 2005 was up 11.1% year over year.

At the same rate of improvement, and also assuming modest increases in expenses, AMR could meet the 7.5% target.

And that's without touching a single contract.

It's as simple as getting the revenue, be it passengers, freight, mail, contract maintenance, AAdvantage miles sold to places like Citibank or Countrywide.

"Other Revenue" was up $200M (about 18%) year over year, largely due to things like BOB, excess baggage, fees for speaking to an agent, upgrades, and yes, contract maintenance.
 
Fitch Revises Outlook on AMR & American Airlines to Stable; Affirms Ratings
CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 2, 2006--Fitch has affirmed the ratings of AMR Corp. and its principal operating subsidiary, American Airlines, Inc. as follows:


AMR

-- Issuer Default Rating (IDR) 'CCC';

-- Senior unsecured debt 'CC/RR6'.

American

-- Issuer Default Rating (IDR) 'CCC';

-- Senior secured bank credit facility 'B/RR1'.

Fitch has also revised the Rating Outlook to Stable from Negative.

Ratings for AMR and American reflect the impact of very high leverage and ongoing cash flow pressures linked to heavy scheduled debt maturities, balanced against significant improvements in the U.S. airline industry revenue outlook for 2006. Despite another year of very high jet fuel prices (average 2006 price of $1.95 per gallon assumed by management), significant gains in passenger revenue per available seat mile (RASM) should put the airline in a position to report stronger free cash flow results this year. This in turn should allow the company to make progress toward its goal of driving debt levels lower in 2006. The return of pricing power over the past year appears to be sustainable in light of domestic capacity reduction linked to the Delta and Northwest bankruptcies, as well as the liquidation of Independence Air in January. Domestic pricing has also been supported by a re-allocation of seats to overseas markets and good capacity discipline by AMR in its current schedule plan. Both domestic and international booking trends appear favorable for 2006.

The Rating Outlook revision to Stable from Negative acknowledges the positive turn in the operating environment and the likely continuation of RASM increases over much of 2006. Notably, unit revenue comparisons will become more challenging in the second half of the year, as mid-2005 fare hikes will be factored into baseline unit revenue numbers. Clearly, AMR's heavy debt load and near-term maturities will require the carrier to drive major improvements in cash flow from operations this year. A reduction of targeted capital spending to $600 million this year creates an opportunity to direct more cash toward the $1.2 billion in scheduled debt principal payments during 2006. AMR will take only two mainline aircraft (B777) deliveries this year and has no further mainline or American Eagle fleet expansion planned over the near term. A modest decline in fuel prices this year, though not forecasted, would provide additional support for a cash flow turnaround and would allow AMR to make progress toward debt reduction without sacrificing its liquidity position. Management has recently emphasized the need for debt reduction and balance sheet repair as the next steps in the airline's financial recovery.

In addition to high jet fuel prices, AMR faces considerable non-fuel operating cost pressures this year. Contractual pay increases of 1.5% going into effect in May, along with significant facilities cost increases associated with airport projects at New York-JFK and Dallas-Ft. Worth, have led the company to target $700 million in cost-saving initiatives for 2006. Unit cost pressures have magnified the importance of ongoing labor-management discussions aimed at productivity improvements. Significantly, no contractual changes are assumed to be part of AMR's cost-reduction program for 2006.

With the improvement in the airline's liquidity position over the past three years (bolstered most recently by an equity offering) and stronger operating results expected in 2006, AMR is in a better position to reduce leverage by year-end. Unrestricted cash and equivalents totaled $3.8 billion at December 31, providing the carrier with a substantial liquidity cushion to support heavy debt principal payments of $1.2 billion this year and approximately $1.2 billion again in 2007. In addition, management has indicated that it expects to fund $250 million in cash payments to its under-funded defined benefit pension plans. AMR's unfunded pension liability ($2.7 billion on a GAAP projected benefit obligation basis at year-end 2004) remains far smaller then the deficits seen at the bankrupt U.S. carriers (Delta and Northwest), and management has not indicated a desire to freeze or terminate its defined benefit plans. This commitment appears to be unaffected by the potential passage of pension funding reform legislation by Congress this year.

In the event that incremental demand or fuel shocks intensify liquidity pressures, AMR retains more financing flexibility than its legacy carrier competitors due to its holdings of unencumbered assets (e.g., American Eagle, American Beacon Advisors and the AA Advantage frequent flyer program) that could be monetized if cash flow trends deteriorate.

Recovery ratings on both AMR's unsecured obligations and the fully-drawn $788 million secured credit facility reflect the variance in expected recovery in a post-default scenario. Strong overcollateralization associated with the pool of aircraft and route authorities backing the credit facility results in superior recovery prospects for lenders ('RR1'). Conversely, recovery on unsecured notes would likely be weak ('RR6'), a scenario that is consistent with recent U.S. airline bankruptcy history.

Fitch's rating definitions and the terms of use of such ratings are available on the agency's public site, www.fitchratings.com. Published ratings, criteria and methodologies are available from this site, at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the 'Code of Conduct' section of this site.

And that's without touching a single contract


The contract damage has been done.
Since they wont be "touching" contracts That means we get nothing back. Should make everyone feel much better 8.5 hours a day. 😀
 

Latest posts

Back
Top