another unsatisfied customer

friedlink

Newbie
Sep 16, 2005
14
0
Tomlin's aggressiveness shows up at every turn
Wednesday, March 28, 2007

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette




:down:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


PHOENIX -- He preaches aggressiveness, and this week Mike Tomlin showed just what that might mean in his new job as the Steelers' head coach.

USAirways, Tomlin said, lost the bag he checked on his direct flight to the NFL meetings in Phoenix from Pittsburgh and gave him the run-around since that occurred Saturday night. Sunday, he was told his bag was in Phoenix and would be delivered to his hotel within four hours. He waited; no bags. He called, again and again.

Monday, Tomlin rode to the airport "to dig it out myself."

"I get over there, and they tell me the bag is not there," Tomlin was saying at breakfast yesterday morning. "I said, 'I've been talking to your call center all weekend, and they said the bag is here.'

"They said, 'I don't care what they told you on the 1-800 number, your bag isn't here.' "

He was offered a $25 voucher on his next flight for his troubles.

"Well, somewhere during the conversation, I see my bag behind her in a pile," Tomlin said. "I said, 'That's my bag!' She said, 'Sir, your bag's not here, the computer says'... I said 'I understand what the computer says, but I'm looking at my bag! It's a black bag, Pittsburgh Steelers. It's my bag.'

"So, I walk around the counter and at that point, she started to get mad. I pulled the tag off and showed her it was my bag. I had to dig it out myself."

Tomlin related that story to a handful of writers gathered around him yesterday as the morning sun popped up in the desert. Perhaps, he did not mean it to be that way, but the narrative served to portray his approach to his job as Steelers coach. He wants to be aggressive, something he has repeated many times since his arrival here.

He also began revealing his plans for the Steelers in 2007 and what he thinks of some of his players. Yesterday, for instance, he publicly committed for the first time to staying with a 3-4 as his base defense next season.

"I know what it does to offenses, I really do," Tomlin said. "It's all about the personnel you have. We have the best 3-4 people in the world, I think. That's what we're going to do."

The more Tomlin looked at the way the Steelers played the 3-4, the more it convinced him to stick with it under coordinator Dick LeBeau rather than try to convert to a 4-3 Tampa 2, the type he coached with the Buccaneers and the Minnesota Vikings.

"To me, I was excited because I came into this league, a mecca, if you will, for the 4-3 defense in the Tampa 2, working with Tony Dungy and Monte Kiffin," Tomlin said. "Now, I'm working every day with what I believe to be the mecca for a 3-4. If you look at my growth development as a coach, man, it doesn't get any better than that. To be around Monte Kiffin and Dick LeBeau, I think you guys will agree with that. It doesn't get any better than that."

The most unsettled position on his Steelers defense may be at cornerback, where Ike Taylor has attracted much of the new coach's attention. Taylor, who signed a fat contract extension before the season began, was benched by coach Bill Cowher midway through it. One of Tomlin's big jobs is to salvage him.

"He's big, he's physical, he's fast. That's what I look at," Tomlin said. "What specifically happened last year in terms of his play, it's irrelevant to me.

"He's capable of a lot. He's capable of being a dominant player, and it's important that he embraces that as we move forward. I know that maybe he's disappointed in how he performed last year. Hopefully, that's fuel for him as we approach this year. ... I know he has the physical tools to be an elite corner. Our job and his job is to make sure that happens."

The mirror of that position on offense comes at wide receiver and whether or not the Steelers have the kind of talent at the position to make defenses respect their passing game.

"There are some questions there," Tomlin said. "It's a big year for Santonio [Holmes], of what kind of player he's going to be. He and I have talked quite a bit about that. That jump a player makes from his rookie year to his second year is critical in terms of what kind of career he's going to have. He's made some plays, he's had some success. He needs to move forward.

"I think some of the things that Nate Washington is capable of has been evident, studying the tape. He needs to move forward.

"I like what the group is capable of being. Satisfied? No. Until you get to know me, you'll realize that very rarely am I satisfied. At the same time, I'm not negative."

There also are the ongoing questions about Ben Roethlisberger and Tomlin's emerging relationship with his quarterback.

"He's a unique guy," Tomlin said. "He's in the building, he's taking an active part in the development of the playbook. He's working well with" coordinator Bruce Arians and quarterbacks coach Ken Anderson.

"I studied the personality types in this game and you know a guy who is uniquely talented like him, a competitor, a ridiculous competitor, a very prideful guy. I haven't been surprised in my reactions to him in terms of maybe what I thought him to be in a personality standpoint."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(
 
"It's all about the personnel you have. We have the best 3-4 people in the world, I think. That's what we're going to do."

This is so true....US has the best frontline people in the industry, but the company has no idea how to use their employees expertise and knowledge to make this a top tier airline...So sad.
 
"It's all about the personnel you have. We have the best 3-4 people in the world, I think. That's what we're going to do."

This is so true....US has the best frontline people in the industry, but the company has no idea how to use their employees expertise and knowledge to make this a top tier airline...So sad.
"Well, somewhere during the conversation, I see my bag behind her in a pile," Tomlin said. "I said, 'That's my bag!' She said, 'Sir, your bag's not here, the computer says'... I said 'I understand what the computer says, but I'm looking at my bag! It's a black bag, Pittsburgh Steelers. It's my bag.'

"So, I walk around the counter and at that point, she started to get mad. I pulled the tag off and showed her it was my bag. I had to dig it out myself."

Yeah, US has got the cream of the crop. This was all Parker's fault. Why didn't he come out and dig through the bags?
 
"It's all about the personnel you have. We have the best 3-4 people in the world, I think. That's what we're going to do."

This is so true....US has the best frontline people in the industry, but the company has no idea how to use their employees expertise and knowledge to make this a top tier airline...So sad.
It is true that US has some of the best frontline, but this certainly is not an example of that. The employee sounds almost confrontational that it was not his bag behind her. Her response should have been to pull the bag and verify if it was or was not his. Instead he had to go behind her and pull it himself. And that's an example of one of the best frontline employees? If anyhting I would show her the door for lack of following through and apparent bad attitude.
 
So the problem now is too much empowerment? One minute Parker is "Stalin", the next he's the French in retreat. You need to TIVO the History Channel so you don't get your hyperbolic analogies mixed up.

Face it, no one gets reprimanded for getting too many positive comment cards. The fact that HP won a JD Power award during Franke's tenure goes to show that people can and will excel in spite of management.

This management can be rightly criticized for two deficiencies: 1) trying to squeeze too much efficiency out of the system which ultimately ends up costing more. and 2) a distracting preoccupation with feeding the insatiable appetite for pity that has been most clearly demonstrated on this BB. Happily, the second is beginnning to diminish as they see the futility in the endevour and force the employees to accept the reality, that the old US is gone, without the sugar frosting.

It's more difficult (if not impossible) to move forward if 2/3* of the people are intent on looking backward.

* Actually there are probably less than 10% of the people whose attitudes and actions are truly corrosive. But their influence on others is frighteningly contagious.
 
So the problem now is too much empowerment? One minute Parker is "Stalin", the next he's the French in retreat. You need to TIVO the History Channel so you don't get your hyperbolic analogies mixed up.

Face it, no one gets reprimanded for getting too many positive comment cards. The fact that HP won a JD Power award during Franke's tenure goes to show that people can and will excel in spite of management.

This management can be rightly criticized for two deficiencies: 1) trying to squeeze too much efficiency out of the system which ultimately ends up costing more. and 2) a distracting preoccupation with feeding the insatiable appetite for pity that has been most clearly demonstrated on this BB. Happily, the second is beginnning to diminish as they see the futility in the endevour and force the employees to accept the reality, that the old US is gone, without the sugar frosting.

It's more difficult (if not impossible) to move forward if 2/3* of the people are intent on looking backward.

* Actually there are probably less than 10% of the people whose attitudes and actions are truly corrosive. But their influence on others is frighteningly contagious.


So the problem now is too much empowerment? One minute Parker is "Stalin", the next he's the French in retreat. You need to TIVO the History Channel so you don't get your hyperbolic analogies mixed up.

Face it, no one gets reprimanded for getting too many positive comment cards. The fact that HP won a JD Power award during Franke's tenure goes to show that people can and will excel in spite of management.

This management can be rightly criticized for two deficiencies: 1) trying to squeeze too much efficiency out of the system which ultimately ends up costing more. and 2) a distracting preoccupation with feeding the insatiable appetite for pity that has been most clearly demonstrated on this BB. Happily, the second is beginnning to diminish as they see the futility in the endevour and force the employees to accept the reality, that the old US is gone, without the sugar frosting.

It's more difficult (if not impossible) to move forward if 2/3* of the people are intent on looking backward.

* Actually there are probably less than 10% of the people whose attitudes and actions are truly corrosive. But their influence on others is frighteningly contagious.

Those of us "originals" who have been around 20 plus years, however, remember how Great this airline was and are hopeful to bring it back to what it was if not better! That is why we look back.