What's new

Bachman and her statements shown to be false

Of course its legal.

Lying about it is legal, too.

What is a politician with dirty underwear to do?

Go Ranger?
 
Whats wrong with accepting a government subsidy?

If its legal.....WTF?

You going to send back your SSI when the day comes?

Or your rental mortgage interest deduction because its not right?


Again, no one other than the right is throwing out the straw man legality BS. So you can give up doing it here at least. No one is falling for it.

This is simply an argument about hypocrisy. She is speaking out against subsidies at the same time she is accepting subsidies. This is like Gore speaking about the environment while he lives in an over sized Mcmansion wasting energy.

Look up the term if you don't get it. Talk to a friend who can explain it better than I can. I don't know. If you do not understand it I give up.

No, I am not going to send back my SS check. I agree with the program. You, Sparrow and Dapoes should since you speak out against it. It would be hypocritical of you not to send it back.

I agree with the interest deduction. If you do not then you should not take the deduction because to take it would be hypocritical.

Is any of this making any sense?
 
Those radical Tea Party extremists...My God, whats one to do?

So tell me what is wrong with taking advantage of government subsidies when the government is pushing these subsidies on the taxpayers dime? I mean, WTF its free and legal unless you be a con running for office.......DUH

If it were a Democrat getting them, and there are some that are, you would be screaming from the highest mountain how Democrats are ruining this country by wastefull spending. However since it's a Tea Party hack you sing a different tune.

Where did I say they were illegal? Once again all I have is pointed out the blatant hypocrisy of those who on one hand denounce gonvernment handouts yet at the same time benefit from them. It's especially galling when they talk about cutting things like Medicare, something most congressman don't have to worry about, but go death, dumb and blind when the subject of farm subsidies come up.
 
If it were a Democrat getting them, and there are some that are, you would be screaming from the highest mountain how Democrats are ruining this country by wastefull spending. However since it's a Tea Party hack you sing a different tune.

Where did I say they were illegal? Once again all I have is pointed out the blatant hypocrisy of those who on one hand denounce gonvernment handouts yet at the same time benefit from them. It's especially galling when they talk about cutting things like Medicare, something most congressman don't have to worry about, but go death, dumb and blind when the subject of farm subsidies come up.

Show anyplace in the COTUS where Farm Subsidies, Medi-Care, Medi-Caid or any such program is permitted? You can't because they don't.

You seek to make this some Re[ & Dem thing which it isn't. There was a very popular Senator from ND name of Tom Dasclhe who was once contemplating a run for President. Know why he didn't run? Turned out his wife Linda was an even bigger Washington Insider than he was. Turns out she was and remains one of the most influential lobbyists in DC. Her Biggest client is/was American Airlines. She recieves revenues from the airlines to the tune of roughly double what the Bachmann's family took in Farm Subsidies over 15 tears.

BTW according to you link since Bachmann became a Congress woman the amount of money paid to her family totals UNDER $7,500! Or less than 3% of the total. Bear in mind we are talking family as in extended family. I mean it's not like she's Fast Eddie Rendell who as a prosecutor knowingly put an innocent man on death row to further his career. Eventually he became head of the DNC and Governor of PA.

Talk about grasping at straws? We're talking adout money her DEAD father in law obtained legally here, not anything she did directly. iIt's VERY difficult to assassinate the character of someone who actually has some. She didn't run up an additional 5 TRILLION in additional Debt, or cause $4.00/Gal Gas, 9.1% Unemployment None of those things are as a result of the actions of Ms Bachmann, We have someone else to thank for that.
 
Show anyplace in the COTUS where Farm Subsidies, Medi-Care, Medi-Caid or any such program is permitted? You can't because they don't.

You seek to make this some Re[ & Dem thing which it isn't. There was a very popular Senator from ND name of Tom Dasclhe who was once contemplating a run for President. Know why he didn't run? Turned out his wife Linda was an even bigger Washington Insider than he was. Turns out she was and remains one of the most influential lobbyists in DC. Her Biggest client is/was American Airlines. She recieves revenues from the airlines to the tune of roughly double what the Bachmann's family took in Farm Subsidies over 15 tears.

BTW according to you link since Bachmann became a Congress woman the amount of money paid to her family totals UNDER $7,500! Or less than 3% of the total. Bear in mind we are talking family as in extended family. I mean it's not like she's Fast Eddie Rendell who as a prosecutor knowingly put an innocent man on death row to further his career. Eventually he became head of the DNC and Governor of PA.

Talk about grasping at straws? We're talking adout money her DEAD father in law obtained legally here, not anything she did directly. iIt's VERY difficult to assassinate the character of someone who actually has some. She didn't run up an additional 5 TRILLION in additional Debt, or cause $4.00/Gal Gas, 9.1% Unemployment None of those things are as a result of the actions of Ms Bachmann, We have someone else to thank for that.

History repeats itself, all that effort just to avoid the fact that Michelle Bachman is a hypocrite and like a lot of Republicans is not really serious about taking on the deficit.
 
If it were a Democrat getting them, and there are some that are, you would be screaming from the highest mountain how Democrats are ruining this country by wastefull spending. However since it's a Tea Party hack you sing a different tune.

Where did I say they were illegal? Once again all I have is pointed out the blatant hypocrisy of those who on one hand denounce gonvernment handouts yet at the same time benefit from them. It's especially galling when they talk about cutting things like Medicare, something most congressman don't have to worry about, but go death, dumb and blind when the subject of farm subsidies come up.


I just laugh my butt off when you guys come off the seat over crap like this.......

At least they are talking.......Harry Reid and his stooges got any good alternative other than kicking the can down the road?

Or making the GOP look bad so they can stay in power?

You better wake up......Medicare isn't the only sacred cow that needs serious changes like it or not.

Or would the alternative be better?

DNC seem hell bent on business as usual and doing nothing serious to reel in the wild rampant spending but to spend more.

So where will it stop??

When Uncle Sams ISF check comes in the statement?

Its deaf,dumb and blind......BTW.
 
Farm Subsidies go mostly to Agri-Business not Family Farms. Those corporations donate to both parties to keep the money flowing. Farm subsidies, like most government programs were the result of FDR's attempt to prevent another Dust Bowl calamity. Corporate welfare is going to be hard to tackle because BOTH sides and their supporters are very adept at feeding at the Government trough.

I for one am glad to see the media's attempted hatchet job of Michele Bachmann because it means their afraid of her and her message. It really rankles the Media that despite their best efforts at demonize Palin & Bachmann they continue to be very popular. I just don't understand why the left is so bigoted towards women.
 
She accepts subsidies, makes money off of subsidies and speaks out against subsidies.
 
Farm Subsidies go mostly to Agri-Business not Family Farms. Those corporations donate to both parties to keep the money flowing. Farm subsidies, like most government programs were the result of FDR's attempt to prevent another Dust Bowl calamity. Corporate welfare is going to be hard to tackle because BOTH sides and their supporters are very adept at feeding at the Government trough.

I for one am glad to see the media's attempted hatchet job of Michele Bachmann because it means their afraid of her and her message. It really rankles the Media that despite their best efforts at demonize Palin & Bachmann they continue to be very popular. I just don't understand why the left is so bigoted towards women.


I do not think we are talking about mostly. We are talking about Bachmann and her acceptance of subsides that she is against. She fed at the trough that she is speaking against.

If that holds true then the republicans must be terrified of Obama and Clinton because that is all they were talking about in 2008. Hell, Clinton was not even in office in the 90's and the republicans went after her like a rabid dog.

Bachmann is news, the media will cover it. If the left is so bigoted to women why is it the first female cabinet member was a democrat? What party had the first female on the ballot for the WH? Saying things does not make it so.
 
She accepts subsidies, makes money off of subsidies and speaks out against subsidies.

You are truly deaf, dumb and blind. The farm belonged to a now DEAD family member. Look at the chart 777Fixer listing the amounts taken each year. From the time she and her husband inherited the farm less than $7,500 in subsidies were accepted or roughly 2.8% of the total received by her Father In Law, NOT HER!

How much was taken in 2008? 2009? Hmmmm? IIRC is was ZERO! She's a hypocrite because a relative took advantage of Government largesse?

Oh and while I'm on a perfectly good rant, revisit 777Fixer's chart which he so graciously provided and kindly show me Michele Bachmann's name anyplace on that list. If this is the only thing the left can come up with is a relative took money legally from a program that she opposes of which was less than 3% since she joined Congress then I'd submit to you that we've found an honest politician.

Suppose we talked about gays the way the media does Bachmann? Do you really think Chris Wallace would ask Barney Frank if he was a flake or better still a flaming queen? How about we ask old Barney if he's the "Pitcher" or the "Catcher" Or if he's the woman in the relationship? Seems fair to me.

So I ask again why are you so bigoted toward Palin & Bachmann? You're just a hater :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Hey insult boy. Keep this in mind the next time you throw that accusation my way. Freaking hypocrite.

Bachmann has held a stake in the family farm since at least 2006. Her clinic has received government aid. She also received money from the government for her 23 foster children.

When did Bachmann inherit the farm? Everything I have read say that she has a financial stake in the farm and that she has received from $32k to $105k in federal subsidies from 2006-2009. She said she never got a dime from the farm but her financial disclosures say different. Whether she is lying or just forgot about it is not a big deal. I guess that stuff happens to republicans as well. The issue is that she is against the subsidies/monies that she has been receiving.

So disagreeing with their politics is hating now?

BTW, Mr Bachmann is a clinical therapist and president of Bachmann & Associates. All indications are that the clinic is his, not hers so it seems that you can strike that business from her resume as well.

Who cares what Wallas says. He is a conservative talk show host. I think his question to Bachmann was stupid, sexist and insensitive. What else is new.
 
When did Bachmann inherit the farm? Everything I have read say that she has a financial stake in the farm and that she has received from $32k to $105k in federal subsidies from 2006-2009. She said she never got a dime from the farm but her financial disclosures say different. Whether she is lying or just forgot about it is not a big deal. I guess that stuff happens to republicans as well. The issue is that she is against the subsidies/monies that she has been receiving.

Let's have a link to these statements you allude to.

Y'all just can't stand a moderately attractive Conservative woman in a position of power. Talk about sexist and hypocritical! Now I just bet if she were some overweight bull dyke then see how it goes if anyone were to dare question her or call her a flake. You'd have the word homophobic on your notepad so you could cut and paste it in ever 9 words.

Got to love the Liberal/Progressive mind set. It makes the Hitler Youth seems like free thinking Libertarians.
 
I seem to recall you saying this is not highschool so gout do not need to supply links and another post where you till people to look it up them selves. Go for it.

So sinice people do not like her it is automatically attributed to her looms and gender and not a legitimate difference of opinion? That makes about as much sense as the race BS with Obama.

For your theory to be true you would have to admit being a racist because your posts regarding Obama are filled with hatred and spite. I belive it is because you disagree with his policies and not his race.

If believing that peoeple dislike Palin and Bachmann is because of their gender andlooms makes hour sleep better, knock your self out.
 
Back
Top