Of people laughing at you.
BaRack Has A Problem Saying "Terrorist"!
- Thread starter southwind
- Start date
Glenn Quagmire
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,809
- Reaction score
- 4,343
I never needed to take a class in finger painting. It came naturally when I was 2.
Did you finally graduate last week?
Dog Wonder
Veteran
A prolonged flatulence noise.
Glenn Quagmire
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,809
- Reaction score
- 4,343
http://www.usatoday....-leaks/2400405/
"They help us prevent terrorist attacks," Obama said...[Friday, June 7, 2013]
Dog Wonder
Veteran
Anything more recent?
southwind
Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 7,709
- Reaction score
- 3,928
Pretty easy to prevent terrorist acts, when you believe acts like Benghazi and Ft. Hood were not committed by Terrorist !
southwind
Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 7,709
- Reaction score
- 3,928
Yup
And...
Bin Laden was Saudi
Al Qaeda was largely Saudi
AQ was largely financed by Saudis
Almost all of the 9-11 hijackers were Saudi
Saudi Arabia is a repressive religious dictatorship, and sympathetic to AQ, who attacked us
And, so, the genius decides...
We . Must . Invade . Iraq
Who had no wmd
Who had no connection to AQ
Who had no connection to any attack on the US
Who was no threat to the US
Ms Tree
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 9,731
- Reaction score
- 9,009
And also neglected Afghanistan and allowed OBL to roam free and Al Queda to build up in Afghanistan. So over ten years later we are still in Afghanistan when we would have been out quite some time ago assuming that Bush even wanted to get out. Since we have built bases in Iraq and Afghanistan I sent think we ever intended to get out and Obama is continuing the screw up the Bush started.
O is getting us out.
More or less "responsibly"
I know that is subject to interpretation
Probably we could have just packed up and left, vs. "finishing the job and leaving the Afghans capable of securing their own country", and in a year or two, no one would actually be able to tell which we had done.
Just packing up would have been diplomatically, and politically, impossible.
That's just how that ball bounces
The trick is avoiding the shoot from the hip stupidity that gets us into these things to begin with.
More or less "responsibly"
I know that is subject to interpretation
Probably we could have just packed up and left, vs. "finishing the job and leaving the Afghans capable of securing their own country", and in a year or two, no one would actually be able to tell which we had done.
Just packing up would have been diplomatically, and politically, impossible.
That's just how that ball bounces
The trick is avoiding the shoot from the hip stupidity that gets us into these things to begin with.
Ms Tree
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 9,731
- Reaction score
- 9,009
I agree that Afghanistan is a difficult situation, I would go so far as to say a loose loose. We broke it and we need to at least try to fix it. The big question is when do you call it quits and agree that it cannot be fixed. Iraq is still a cluster phuck and I do not think Afghanistan will be any better.
We went in with no plan and this is the end result. FUBAR.
We went in with no plan and this is the end result. FUBAR.
Similar threads
