What's new

Benghazi Threads-Merged

Boehners budget bill:
 
LIBYA:
The troubled country cannot receive any U.S. aid until the secretary of state confirms the country is cooperating with ongoing investigations into the September 2012 attack at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
 
Hope you got a prybar Bear.
 
Her actions alone caused the collapse of Libya while Ghaddafi was seeking US intervention.
 
Hillary hasn't announced her intentions.....LOL     Tip of the iceberg.......
 
 
Top Pentagon officials and a senior Democrat in Congress so distrusted Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 2011 march to war in Libya that they opened their own diplomatic channels with the Gadhafi regime in an effort to halt the escalating crisis, according to secret audio recordings recovered from Tripoli.
The tapes, reviewed by The Washington Times and authenticated by the participants, chronicle U.S. officials’ unfiltered conversations with Col. Moammar Gadhafi’s son and a top Libyan leader, including criticisms that Mrs. Clinton had developed tunnel vision and led the U.S. into an unnecessary war without adequately weighing the intelligence community’s concerns.
 
 
“You should see these internal State Department reports that are produced in the State Department that go out to the Congress. They’re just full of stupid, stupid facts,” an American intermediary specifically dispatched by the Joint Chiefs of Staff told the Gadhafi regime in July 2011, saying the State Department was controlling what intelligence would be reported to U.S. officials.
 
 
Gadhafi’s son and heir apparent, Seif Gadhafi, told American officials in the secret conversations that he was worried Mrs. Clinton was using false pretenses to justify unseating his father and insisted that the regime had no intention of harming a mass of civilians. He compared Mrs. Clinton’s campaign for war to that of the George W. Bush administration’s now debunked weapons of mass destruction accusations, which were used to lobby Congress to invade Iraq, the tapes show.
 
 
“It was like the WMDs in Iraq. It was based on a false report,” Gadhafi said in a May 2011 phone call to Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat serving at the time. “Libyan airplanes bombing demonstrators, Libyan airplanes bombing districts in Tripoli, Libyan army killed thousands, etc., etc., and now the whole world found there is no single evidence that such things happened in Libya.”
Seif Gadhafi also warned that many of the U.S.-supported armed rebels were “not freedom fighters” but rather jihadists whom he described as “gangsters and terrorists.”
“And now you have NATO supporting them with ships, with airplanes, helicopters, arms, training, communication,” he said in one recorded conversation with U.S. officials. “We ask the American government send a fact-finding mission to Libya. I want you to see everything with your own eyes.”
 
This is the start of Elizabeth Warrens campaign.
 
 
The surreptitiously taped conversations reveal an extraordinary departure from traditional policy, in which the U.S. government speaks to foreign governments with one voice coordinated by the State Department.
Instead, the tapes show that the Pentagon’s senior uniformed leadership and a congressman from Mrs. Clinton’s own party conveyed sentiments to the Libyan regime that undercut or conflicted with the secretary of state’s own message at the time.
“If this story is true, it would be highly unusual for the Pentagon to conduct a separate set of diplomatic negotiations, given the way we operated when I was secretary of state,” James A. Baker III, who served under President George H.W. Bush, told The Times. “In our administration, the president made sure that we all sang from the same hymnal.”
 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/28/hillary-clinton-undercut-on-libya-war-by-pentagon-/?page=all
 
Now wanting answers, and so far, hiding behind Congressional challenges, but now failing to evade due process through legal challenges via the courts, it is all staring to unravel for the Queen.
 
SparrowHawk said:
It has to do with one simple question.
 
Would we be talking about 4 dead US Diplomats/Soldiers killed in Libya if the US government had a policy of Non Intervention?
We had a policy of non-intervention prior to WWII. Radical Islam caught my attention during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. Other events such as our embassies being bombed in Africa and the first attempt to bring down the WTC in the early 90's. Radical Islam has been on the march for a long time much like Hitler gobbled up Europe.

I'm going to vote for the most conservative candidate in the next presidential election primary. I've had enough of the WH press briefings where they can't even say the word, terrorist. That's not leadership.
 
CactusPilot1 said:
We had a policy of non-intervention prior to WWII. Radical Islam caught my attention during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. Other events such as our embassies being bombed in Africa and the first attempt to bring down the WTC in the early 90's. Radical Islam has been on the march for a long time much like Hitler gobbled up Europe.

I'm going to vote for the most conservative candidate in the next presidential election primary. I've had enough of the WH press briefings where they can't even say the word, terrorist. That's not leadership.
 
SparrowHawk said:
 
It has to do with one simple question.
 
Would we be talking about 4 dead US Diplomats/Soldiers killed in Libya if the US government had a policy of Non Intervention?
What do you suggest? We berry our heads in the sand and pretend nothing is going on? http://www.cnn.com/
 
It's going to get interesting, Trey Gowdy has all the 'secret' tapes.
 
 
“The chairman of a special House committee created to investigate the 2012 Benghazi tragedy on Monday instructed his staff to review secretly recorded tapes and intelligence reports that detail Hillary Rodham Clinton’s role in advocating and executing the war in Libya, opening the door for a possible expansion of his probe.
Rep. Trey Gowdy’s decision to seek a review of the materials, first highlighted in a series of Washington Times stories last week, carries consequences for the 2016 election in which Mrs. Clinton is expected to seek the presidency. It could also move the committee to examine the strained relationship between the State Department and Pentagon, which sharply disagreed over the 2011 war in Libya and the response to the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi a year later.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/2/hillary-clinton-libya-tapes-set-house-benghazi-com/
 
delldude said:
 
I understand how those poor Muslims are feeling.
 
I have the same rage everytime I see Christians being persecuted, stoned, beheaded,etc.
hey  now you can add being burned alive to the list.
but hey let's leave them alone they'll never bother us here. 🙄
 
We had a policy of non-intervention prior to WWII. Radical Islam caught my attention during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. Other events such as our embassies being bombed in Africa and the first attempt to bring down the WTC in the early 90's. Radical Islam has been on the march for a long time much like Hitler gobbled up Europe.

I'm going to vote for the most conservative candidate in the next presidential election primary. I've had enough of the WH press briefings where they can't even say the word, terrorist. That's not leadership.
Radical Islam caught my attention at the 1972 Olympics when the dogs decided to take their(smoke screen)agenda on the national arena. Arafat's rival told an Italian journalist back in the 60s that Muslims are a stubborn people and will advance inch-by-inch until they have taken over in the name of their cause. Europe has been plagued by Radical Islam since the 70s at least. And their homegrown terrorists, such as the Red Brigades, were trained by Arab and Palestinian terrorists. Their goal is to collapse the government.
 
cltrat said:
hey  now you can add being burned alive to the list.
but hey let's leave them alone they'll never bother us here. 🙄
 
 
Notice it seems like the world is awaiting US to do something.
 
Oops, wrong prez.
 
Is Muslims killing Muslims any concern of ours?
 
It will be when they conquer the Roman Empire.
 
cltrat said:
hey  now you can add being burned alive to the list.
but hey let's leave them alone they'll never bother us here. 🙄
You do realize that Moaz al-Kasasbeh was a devout Muslim. isis is not interested in furthering a religious cause (at this time). They are interested in political and territorial gains.

We opened the door for them and let them in. Now we must deal with it. Regime change motivated war has consequences. isis is one of those left over from removing sadaam hussein.
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
You do realize that Moaz al-Kasasbeh was a devout Muslim. isis is not interested in furthering a religious cause (at this time). They are interested in political and territorial gains.

We opened the door for them and let them in. Now we must deal with it. Regime change motivated war has consequences. isis is one of those left over from removing sadaam hussein.
 
 

tell you what get back to me when your president has the stones to call them what they actually are instead of kissing their ass.
Nice backdoor way to blame Bush btw.
 
seen unconfirmed report that Jordan plans to execute all ISIS prisoners hopefully that's true better yet maybe they do it on TV 
 

Latest posts

Back
Top