What's new

Birth Control

See her testifying in front of the House Democratic Policy and Steering Committee.

C-Span link to her testifying.

Of course if Neal Boortz says it didn't happen than it must be true.

OK, I love C-span but truth is she DID NOT testify before an committee of Congress. Not then, not now.

You're always demanding proof. If she had testified before a sanctioned committee of the US Congress it would be very easy to prove as her so called "Testimony" would be there. Watching Nancy Pelosi's little dog & pony show was just that! Theater! Nothing more. Not even reaching the level of Special Order Speeches.

I couldn't find a transcript in the Congressional Record. Produce one if not? STFU because a group of Demorats meeting in a room is like me and Dell hanging at the Sea Shell Lounge interviewing a US Airways pilot. Nice, Factual but otherwise of little meaning. The fact that the RushTard took the bait says a great deal about his audience.
 
I think Rush fell for it hook, line, and sinker.

Those sneaky Dems, making Rush look like a woman hater.


REDSTATE.COM
Limbaugh knows that last week, he was pretty hard on Sandra Fluke, he was tough, and he made a mistake. It’s amazing, Limbaugh admits, that he made a mistake. He said some mean things about poor Sandra Fluke and probably pushed the limits of what he should have say. But Limbaugh says he went too far in calling her a ‘slut’ because he lowered himself…lowered himself to the Democrats level. He lowered himself to every dirty, underhanded and despicable thing the Democrats have ever done. And for that, he’s sorry.

2k8e1763ab96.gif
 
OK, I love C-span but truth is she DID NOT testify before an committee of Congress. Not then, not now.
Issa denied the request to have her testify at the original man only hearing. But hey, don't let that get in the way of your Neal Boortz supported rant (link?). (I didn't know he was a Libertarian.)

If you read the comments in the link by C-Span, it explains why she was relegated to testify in front of the Congressional committee in the link. I guess that makes it better in your view...

I am sure that the Republican chairmen of several committees will now come out with many women refuting Ms. Fluke's testimony.

When they do, please provide the C-Span link.
 
Issa denied the request to have her testify at the original man only hearing. But hey, don't let that get in the way of your Neal Boortz supported rant (link?). (I didn't know he was a Libertarian.)

If you read the comments in the link by C-Span, it explains why she was relegated to testify in front of the Congressional committee in the link. I guess that makes it better in your view...

I am sure now that the Republican chairmen of several committees will come out with many women refuting Ms. Fluke's testimony.

When they do, please provide the C-Span link.

Still wasn't Congressional testimony. And the hearing? One and only agenda driven witness?
Such an important hearing one would think several experts would be on the bill, but only one, an advocate of Reproductive Justice. Reproductive Justice,Environmental Justice, Social Justice,Justice....new term or you aren't aware thats the lingo of your Marxist/Socialist/Communist crowd.....look it up if you don't believe me Comrade.....
Dude, you can't see when you're being sold a bag of crap by your own party?
 
Issa denied the request to have her testify at the original man only hearing. But hey, don't let that get in the way of your Neal Boortz supported rant (link?). (I didn't know he was a Libertarian.)

If you read the comments in the link by C-Span, it explains why she was relegated to testify in front of the Congressional committee in the link. I guess that makes it better in your view...

I am sure that the Republican chairmen of several committees will now come out with many women refuting Ms. Fluke's testimony.

When they do, please provide the C-Span link.


Exactly.

Ms Fluke would have testified before the committee but was denied the right to do so because her testimony would not have fit into the agenda of the republicans and the members of the clergy who testified.

It is quite telling that a woman speaking out for equal rights for women is called derogatory names by a misogynistic convicted drug dealer, various chauvinists on this board and the right wing pundits. Yet no one has said a peep about the all white, all male, all religious biased pigs who are willing to deny women equal rights for medical care.

I guess it is much easier to call her vile names that you would not want your daughter or mother called than to actually hold a hearing that was balanced and fair to all people affected. Issa is a chauvinist pig for not having a single woman testify but Fluke is a slut according to a convicted drug addict. Republicans should be so proud.
 
Issa denied the request to have her testify at the original man only hearing. But hey, don't let that get in the way of your Neal Boortz supported rant (link?). (I didn't know he was a Libertarian.)

If you read the comments in the link by C-Span, it explains why she was relegated to testify in front of the Congressional committee in the link. I guess that makes it better in your view...

I am sure that the Republican chairmen of several committees will now come out with many women refuting Ms. Fluke's testimony.

When they do, please provide the C-Span link.

Mt Bortz is somewhat Libertarian. Not that it should or would make a difference. I don't care why, she's a liar stating she gave "testimony" when no such thing happened. Mr Issa, just as any Committee Chairman can reject testimony from anyone for any reason. Sadly it happens everyday. Right now to me Issa is looking pretty smart. Like maybe he vetted her and rejected her due to his not wanting a stunt like the one that is ongoing.

Face it Tech, YOU, "Mr Facts" got snagged just as the RushTard did. You swallowed the Grandstanding hook, line & sinker. Fact is No Congressional Record transcript equals no "testimony" before Congress. Show us the Transcript? I'm not giving you a link for Boortz, you're a smart guy find it yourself. You want it cited, it was and that's all you get.
 
Exactly.

Ms Fluke would have testified before the committee but was denied the right to do so because her testimony would not have fit into the agenda of the republicans and the members of the clergy who testified.

It is quite telling that a woman speaking out for equal rights for women is called derogatory names by a misogynistic convicted drug dealer, various chauvinists on this board and the right wing pundits. Yet no one has said a peep about the all white, all male, all religious biased pigs who are willing to deny women equal rights for medical care.

I guess it is much easier to call her vile names that you would not want your daughter or mother called than to actually hold a hearing that was balanced and fair to all people affected. Issa is a chauvinist pig for not having a single woman testify but Fluke is a slut according to a convicted drug addict. Republicans should be so proud.

BTW, the drug-related criminal charges against Limbaugh were dropped by prosecutors when Limbaugh agreed to pay $30,000 to defray the cost of the investigation and complete an 18-month therapy regimen with his physician

Crusaders having a hissy fit.
 
BTW, the drug-related criminal charges against Limbaugh were dropped by prosecutors when Limbaugh agreed to pay $30,000 to defray the cost of the investigation and complete an 18-month therapy regimen with his physician

Crusaders having a hissy fit.

He's an addict! Get over it! He's in recovery but he will be an addict until he dies! He made choices as surely as Ms Fluke did. He threw a mighty big stone for a guy who lives in a glass house. For a guy who is supposedly so savvy he sure fell into a well laid trap.

Sadly there was a time when he was viable and relevant. That time has passed. Time to let the Young ones have at it. Frankly I'm surprised no one has brought up his numerous marriages. One can only speculate about those escapades.

Compare the words of Ms Fluke to these below:
View attachment 9369
 
"The conventional wisdom now is that Obama is going to win because the Republicans are killing each other. That's absurd. Obama is not going to win, I helped the only Demcoratic president in sixty years to get elected, so I know something about what it takes. And there's no way this guy is going to win."

Ok....

That EFFEMINATE lil' man..................DICK Morris is Opening his MOUTH at the wrong time. 😛h34r:
In fact, he's "?" ...another example, (like OXY-PORKY PIG) though powerful up to this point, that THINKS he isn't capable of making an Enormous blunder.

As for FATSO, he's now going through advertiser's Faster than MARK FOLEY was going through Male Congressional Page's ! 🙂 🙂
 

Latest posts

Back
Top