Boyd On Us Airways & Us Airways

FM2436

Veteran
Jan 8, 2003
747
11
Kinda thought provoking comments.

http://www.aviationplanning.com/asrc1.htm

Airline Failures In 2005:
Not Necessarily, But...

Here's a fact: The only reason that the airline industry as a whole is in financial chaos is because of fuel.

Here's another fact: Had oil prices not spiked in 2004, most legacy carriers would be reporting strong profits, notwithstanding depressed yields. But spike they did, and the industry is again producing a sea of red ink.

Naturally, the usual suspects in the write-before-you-research segments of the media will continue to offend journalistic standards by filing stories about the need for "consolidation" and how the legacy carrier model is "broken." These people are fully exercising their right to make fools of themselves.

Here's a reality: There are no guarantees that any airlines will go 86 in the coming year. Strategies can change, more efficiencies can be found. And oil prices may well drop into the mid-$30 range. Things change. Management can change. Market tactics can change. It's clear that traffic demand is robust. Nevertheless, as of December 2004, we have three carriers that may be on the road to oblivion if they don't fundamentally change direction.

US Airways. Regardless of the causes, this airline system is a goner if it cannot get its labor relations in order. It appears to have degenerated into the Hatfields and McCoys, except they're all armed with lawyers instead of guns. Somebody might want to advise the company's bankruptcy attorneys that employees are not some sort of cattle that can simply be replaced with another, cheaper herd. On the other hand, having unions threatening to strike does wonders to keep passengers away in droves. The anger, the hurt, and the pain employees experienced in being forced to take huge pay cuts, only to be told to give more, cannot be underestimated. But US Airways is headed for extinction if this near civil-war situation isn't reversed very soon.
 
Interesting article, and not entirely off the mark, but...

FM2436 said:
Had oil prices not spiked in 2004, most legacy carriers would be reporting strong profits, notwithstanding depressed yields.
Yeah, but oil prices did spike. There are any number of things that we could say would have produced profits this year. If UAIRs pilots and f/as had agreed last year to work for free, UAIR's situation might be really different today (probably not, but as long as we are speculating...).

FM2436 said:
Here's a reality: There are no guarantees that any airlines will go 86 in the coming year. Strategies can change, more efficiencies can be found. And oil prices may well drop into the mid-$30 range.
[post="228827"][/post]​

Here's another reality for you. OPEC has announced a cutback in production of a million bbls/day to keep prices up. As long as Americans are willing to pay any price to drive alone to work in their domestic production Sherman tanks, why should OPEC take less for their product than people are willing to pay? The chairman of ExxonMobil said almost a year ago in a TV interview that "we will never see $1.50/gal gasoline again." If gasoline stays above $1.50/gal, jet-A will stay above $1.00.
 
Repairing relations here is a 2-way street, we must be able at some point to move on as well.

How many of can do that?


FM2436 said:
Kinda thought provoking comments.

http://www.aviationplanning.com/asrc1.htm

Airline Failures In 2005:
Not Necessarily, But...


US Airways. Regardless of the causes, this airline system is a goner if it cannot get its labor relations in order. It appears to have degenerated into the Hatfields and McCoys, except they're all armed with lawyers instead of guns. Somebody might want to advise the company's bankruptcy attorneys that employees are not some sort of cattle that can simply be replaced with another, cheaper herd. On the other hand, having unions threatening to strike does wonders to keep passengers away in droves... But US Airways is headed for extinction if this near civil-war situation isn't reversed very soon.
[post="228827"][/post]​