City of Dallas still in talks with Delta about Love Field
- Thread starter swamt
- Start date
- Status
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
unlike some airlines, DL actually does have quality control procedures for its contractors.
that might be why DCI carriers have the best on-time and completion data of the big 3 US carriers.
further, as with most of your pulled out of your backside hypotheses, there really is no information that you have that ExpressJet doesn't provide good performance for DL, now is there?
btw, I mentioned a long time ago that DL could choose to have blurred lines between the rest of ExpressJet's operations and access to DAL.
Like you, I have no proof of that but at least there isn't any public proof that is available while your hypothesis can be readily tested based on public data - and shown to be not substantiated.
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
precisely.
DL is at DAL AND DFW for the same reason that DL serves both MDW and ORD - because both cities have two airports and which are also joined as a common market. there is a benefit in being able to serve both. DL's performance in every market it serves from ORD and MDW in common as well as HOU/IAH show it.
DL is simply not willing to allow any competitor to serve DL hubs w/o being willing to fight despite the inability of some people here to understand the concept of defending one's key markets.
and the 717s are more than twice the size of the 50 seaters that DL previously used. It isn't just a slight increase in seats which is also why DL's boardings at DAL for Nov were up by over 100% - a greater increase than UA and WN.
DL is at DAL AND DFW for the same reason that DL serves both MDW and ORD - because both cities have two airports and which are also joined as a common market. there is a benefit in being able to serve both. DL's performance in every market it serves from ORD and MDW in common as well as HOU/IAH show it.
DL is simply not willing to allow any competitor to serve DL hubs w/o being willing to fight despite the inability of some people here to understand the concept of defending one's key markets.
and the 717s are more than twice the size of the 50 seaters that DL previously used. It isn't just a slight increase in seats which is also why DL's boardings at DAL for Nov were up by over 100% - a greater increase than UA and WN.
eolesen
Veteran
- Jul 23, 2003
- 15,907
- 9,359
Not quite.swamt said:
UAX is operating 7 trips a day, DL is operating 5.
Looking at the schedule, they do manage to get everything in and out of one gate, but there's not a lot of room for error:
Code:
Inbound Arrive Depart Outbound
ORIG 06:30 DL2574
ORIG 07:00 UA4682
UA4331 8:25 08:55 UA4331
DL2037 09:28 10:04 DL2037
UA6015 10:17 10:47 UA6015
UA4317 11:23 11:53 UA4317
DL1303 12:12 12:47 DL1303
DL2500 14:57 15:35 DL2500
UA3267 15:07 15:37 UA3267
UA4180 16:40 17:10 UA4180
DL0932 17:25 18:01 DL2515
UA4315 18:39 19:09 UA4315
DL1292 22:07 RON
UA4350 22:15 RON
Kev3188
Veteran
Looks like there's an over lap between DL 2500 and UA 3267?
does this plane go to paris
Senior
I'm waiting for WT to change their moniker toWorldTraveler said:
"Delta Flights Matter" and I'm sure he'll lead the organizations in picketing if they ever lose the gates at DAL.
jimntx
Veteran
That's gonna be one crowded jetbridge with 2 a/c at the same time. I'm sure they will need someone on the jetbridge to direct passengers to the correct a/c. Just added expense.Kev3188 said:
robbedagain
Veteran
im sure DL boarding is 100% up bec Im sure theyre siphoning the traffic right out of WN Yep anything DL does is beautiful and everything else any other airline does is flat out wrong..
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
UA has the fewest number of SEATS.
robbedagain
Veteran
yes it is and WN is making good use of it for the Bay Area
- Status
Similar threads
