What's new

Congrats Michael Sam!

Gurl, it's obvious to those of us who aren't mentally impaired that the President was obviously saying that if he had a son, he would be black. Durrr. But nice job of completely derailing a thread which, if you remember, was created to recognize an individual for being drafted by the NFL, which is an accomplishment in itself.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
Gurl, it's obvious to those of us who aren't mentally impaired that the President was obviously saying that if he had a son, he would be black. 
If that is what you choose to believe then go right ahead. You are very talented at self delusion. 
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
You are obviously an elegant speaker. I am riveted.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
But nice job of completely derailing a thread which, if you remember, was created to recognize an individual for being drafted by the NFL, which is an accomplishment in itself.
Actually this is how YOU started the thread.
AdAstraPerAspera said:
http://www.glaad.org/blog/historic-move-michael-sam-drafted-nfl-first-openly-gay-player

In 1945 Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier; I'm sure there were people then who thought it would never happen. This was imagined to be the same...

Best wishes to Sam and his boyfriend, and here's hoping for a successful career!  🙂
The topic was not about anyone getting drafted, it was about someone breaking a "barrier". 
 
Followed by this garbage.
AdAstraPerAspera said:
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/05/michael-sam-rams-draft-kiss
 
michael-sam-kiss.jpg

 
He seems pretty happy.
 
I didn't know having the blessings and opportunities to play professional-level sports wasn't something to be proud of anymore.
Yet you come on here and make the claim that this thread "was created to recognize an individual for being drafted by the NFL".
 
Typical self deluding lying liberal.
 
I am all too happy to point out what a lying little weasel you are.
 
By the way I never got your response on this...
 
http://www.cdc.gov/h.../ataglance.html
 
https://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/hrc-issue-brief-hiv-aids-and-the-lgbt-community#_ftn2
 
Although MSM represent about 4% of the male population in the United States, in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections. 
 
Let's see you libtard spin your way out of that.
 
EDIT: Upon checking my links I noticed the CDC link from before was broken. I did a Google search and found a replacement. The I found something even more interesting.
 
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/surveillance/incidence/
 
Although MSM represent about 7% of the male population in the United States, in 2010 MSM accounted for 78% of the new HIV infections among males.
 
Funny how that "represented" percentage went up 3 percent but the percentage of infections remained the same.
 
Ministry of Truth
 
Wow, you are a mental midget. I hope the mods close this thread now that it has been taken so off topic, thanks.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
Actually this is how YOU started the thread.
 
Nope. Look at the very first post. Nice try. Spin again.
 
I think you can send the mods a note. Also, on another forum I belong the thread originator can lock a thread on their own. Never tried it here.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
Nope. Look at the very first post. Nice try. Spin again.
AdAstraPerAspera said:
http://www.glaad.org/blog/historic-move-michael-sam-drafted-nfl-first-openly-gay-player

In 1945 Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier; I'm sure there were people then who thought it would never happen. This was imagined to be the same...

Best wishes to Sam and his boyfriend, and here's hoping for a successful career!  🙂
Another left lie.
 
No spin here. That was the first post in the thread and it belongs to YOU.
 
Own it.
 
 
 
 
What about this?

La Li Lu Le Lo said:
By the way I never got your response on this...
 
http://www.cdc.gov/h.../ataglance.html
 
https://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/hrc-issue-brief-hiv-aids-and-the-lgbt-community#_ftn2
 
Although MSM represent about 4% of the male population in the United States, in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections. 
 
Let's see you libtard spin your way out of that.
 
EDIT: Upon checking my links I noticed the CDC link from before was broken. I did a Google search and found a replacement. The I found something even more interesting.
 
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/surveillance/incidence/
 
Although MSM represent about 7% of the male population in the United States, in 2010 MSM accounted for 78% of the new HIV infections among males.
 
Funny how that "represented" percentage went up 3 percent but the percentage of infections remained the same.
 
Ministry of Truth
You ever going to comment on it or are you just going to ignore it and hope it goes away?
 
Straight from the CDC. Spin it if you can.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
Gurl, it's obvious to those of us who aren't mentally impaired that the President was obviously saying that if he had a son, he would be black. Durrr. But nice job of completely derailing a thread which, if you remember, was created to recognize an individual for being drafted by the NFL, which is an accomplishment in itself.
And let go by 2 teams.
 
The question is NOT whom he chooses to sleep with. The question is CAN HE PLAY FOOTBALL? At an NFL Level? Apparently the answer is NO.
 
Equality is NOT special treatment.
 
Let me let you in on a secret. If Michael Sam was playing for the St Louis Rams and lead the league in Tackles or Sacks and the team was winning as a result of his efforts, half the guys would bend over in the shower and the other half would buy soap on a rope with never a negative word publiished.
 
Truly we miss the point. The NFL and any other sporting event knows that regardless how GREAT the player is, admitting to be gay decreases ticket sales.

Kissing your lover and being gay will bankrupt you immediately.

But continue to argue around the elephant in a china store.

nuf sed!
 
Says you!
 
For me as an Eagles fan I don't care if Nick Foles and Darren Sproles take turns with Riley Cooper and Shady McCoy. Just so long as they win. I just don't care, sorry maybe I'm the only one who feels that way?
 
I just don't get why it's anyone's business who screws who. I do draw the line at animals and children as they do not possess the ability to consent. Otherwise? Go for it!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top