Day Of Reckoning Near For Some Airlines

700UW

Corn Field
Nov 11, 2003
37,637
19,488
NC
Day of Reckoning Near for Some Airlines
Sunday September 12, 4:01 am ET
By Brad Foss, AP Business Writer
Day of Reckoning Approaches for Several Big Airlines: Delta, US Airways and United


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Several long-suffering airlines appear to have reached a breaking point, with fuel prices unrelentingly high, cash reserves dwindling and customers addicted to cheap fares. US Airways may file for bankruptcy court protection a second time and could be forced to liquidate, Delta is on the precipice of bankruptcy and United is battling an employee revolt as it aims to scrap its pension plans.

The frantic restructuring under way at these carriers and others means more anguish for workers and shareholders, although fliers in most markets should continue to see an abundance of low fares. While not every carrier is guaranteed to survive, analysts say the imminent upheaval could augur a brighter long-term future for the industry.

"This is the beginning of the recognition that surgery is necessary for the legacy carriers," said Michael E. Levine, a former airline executive who teaches law at Yale University. "And while it's painful, and not all of the surgery will be successful, it's the only way they're going to get healthy."

What ails carriers such as Delta Air Lines Inc. and US Airways Group Inc. more than anything else is the disproportionately high cost of their operations.

This makes it nearly impossible for them to compete with efficient, well-financed and fast-growing carriers such as Southwest Airlines Co. and JetBlue Airways Corp., whose cheap fares have become the standard by which budget-conscious fliers comparison shop. In fact, their larger competitors -- whose costs per available seat mile in some cases are more than 30 percent higher than those of Southwest -- have slashed ticket prices to unprofitable levels on many routes just to keep their customer bases from shrinking further.

"Pricing power has moved from the airlines to the consumer," said Phil Roberts, managing partner of the transportation consultancy Unisys R2A in Oakland, Calif. "And so what it comes down to, in the end, is the large carriers needing to create a cost base where they can be profitable at these price levels."

With cash reserves shrinking rapidly and earlier efforts to slash expenses proving inadequate, some of the nation's largest airlines are now moving ahead with dramatic transformation plans.

-- Delta sketched plans this week to eliminate up to 7,000 jobs, cut employee wages and shed its Dallas hub as part of a $5 billion cost-saving program. The Atlanta-based airline has warned that it could be forced into bankruptcy soon if it cannot stem a recent surge in early retirements among older pilots, who are taking big lump-sum pension payments for fear that their retirement accounts could be wiped out as part of the airline's makeover.

-- US Airways made a last-ditch offer to its divided pilots' union Friday for a new labor contract. It says it needs $800 million in labor concessions in order to avoid its second Chapter 11 filing in less than two years, and possibly a liquidation. The day of reckoning for the Arlington, Va., carrier could come as early as this weekend. Among other strategic changes, US Airways plans to simplify its fare structure and tweak it's hub-and-spoke route network to more closely emulate the point-to-point networks that have been successful for low-fare carriers.

-- United parent UAL Corp., which has been operating under Chapter 11 since December 2002, is putting together its third turnaround proposal to a bankruptcy judge. As part of that process, United has threatened to terminate its pension plans in order to attract additional financing. United CEO Glenn Tilton recently said in a recorded message to employees that the airline could save $625 million a year through new call center, maintenance, airport station and commuter-carrier agreements, though he did not detail how the savings would be achieved.

-- Alaska Air Group Inc. on Thursday increased the number of employees it plans to lay off by 750, bringing the total to about 900, as part of a broader plan to save $35 million a year.

Duane Woerth, president of the Air Line Pilots Association, said he is optimistic that the latest moves will be more effective than the post-Sept. 11, 2001 strategy of laying off tens of thousands of workers and getting the remainder to accept lower wages and benefits.

While job and pay cuts remain in the mix this time around, the troubled airlines also appear intent on reshaping their operations from head to toe, he said.

This means retrenching from certain markets -- Delta from Dallas, US Airways from Pittsburgh -- in order to sharpen their focus in fewer, select cities where they stand the best chance of growing. And it means utilizing aircraft and employees more efficiently, so that they have less idle time in which expenses are incurred but no revenue comes in.

"It's easier to go to our membership (to vote on proposed concessions) if we see changes that we believe are going to help the business," Woerth said.

Of course, while it's Delta and US Airways making headlines these days, Woerth said it could be just a matter of time before carriers such as Northwest Airlines Corp. and Continental Airlines Inc. unveil their own turnaround plans. "We're going to remain busy," he said.

A key factor exacerbating the major carriers' problems in recent months has been the stubbornly high cost of oil, which makes jet fuel more expensive too. Because fliers are so price sensitive, carriers have been largely unsuccessful at raising fares to pass along the higher fuel costs, magnifying their losses.

Merrill Lynch estimates that the nine largest U.S. carriers will lose some $700 million during the July-September quarter, which is traditionally the industry's strongest due to summer travel. Had fuel prices held steady at last year's levels, those same carriers would have turned a profit of about $500 million, the investment bank said in a report.

The flurry of restructuring now under way will hit airline employees the hardest, analysts said, though there are also financial risks ahead for travelers, aircraft manufacturers, small companies that provide airport-support services such as catering and cleaning -- and even rival carriers.

If US Airways liquidates, for example, it would send shockwaves through UAL, which takes in roughly $300 million a year through a code-sharing agreement with the carrier, Port Washington, N.Y.-based airline consultant Robert Mann said.

For aircraft makers such as Boeing Co. and Airbus S.A.S, the threats are mainly limited to their finance units, which have significant exposure to Delta and US Airways, respectively.

Fliers, meanwhile, risk losing any accrued frequent-flier benefits in the event of a liquidation, not to mention reduced service and potentially higher fares, although analysts believe any competitive vacuum would be quickly filled.

Low-fare leaders Southwest and JetBlue have little to worry about near-term, experts said, as it will take several years for the cost-cutting programs at Delta, US Airways and other carriers to reach their maximum potential.

"Clearly, the problems that the legacy carriers are having will continue to create opportunities for the low-cost carriers for quite a while," said Daniel Kasper, who runs the transportation practice for the consulting firm LECG in Cambridge, Mass.

"But if you look farther out," he added, "and if the companies and their employees can successfully make these transitions, they are going to be much more competitive."
 
It is a no-brainer as to the need to lower costs, and those that do will be around, those that do not will go away.

DUH

700UW said:
Day of Reckoning Near for Some Airlines
Sunday September 12, 4:01 am ET
By Brad Foss, AP Business Writer
Day of Reckoning Approaches for Several Big Airlines: Delta, US Airways and United
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Several long-suffering airlines appear to have reached a breaking point, with fuel prices unrelentingly high, cash reserves dwindling and customers addicted to cheap fares. US Airways may file for bankruptcy court protection a second time and could be forced to liquidate, Delta is on the precipice of bankruptcy and United is battling an employee revolt as it aims to scrap its pension plans..."But if you look farther out," he added, "and if the companies and their employees can successfully make these transitions, they are going to be much more competitive."
[post="178888"][/post]​
 
This is tough and sad and all have my sympathy. But considering the overwhelming conventional wisdom of the problems of the legacy carriers, what are the chances that any judge is going to not agree that U's problem is labor costs? Maybe there is a 'truth' out there, but I don't think that a judge is going to go much farther than this article in being convinced that U's labor costs make it incapable of competing or making a return for creditors. Owners are going to pay the ultimate price for the failure to transform U. The only remaining question is whether, with much more dramatic tools at its disposal, U management under court supervision can create a business plan going forward that is better for creditors than liquidation (or some other plan presented by creditors).

How a judge comes to the conclusion that U doesn't need a massive cut back in labor expenses I just don't see.
 
The unions get to argue against the modifications. When you can show the labor costs are lower then the majors and the most succesful LCC (WN) and you can show where non-labor costs not including fuel has increased and management has not negotiated in good faith, I believe the unions have a good chance.
 
700UW said:
The unions get to argue against the modifications. When you can show the labor costs are lower then the majors and the most succesful LCC (WN) and you can show where non-labor costs not including fuel has increased and management has not negotiated in good faith, I believe the unions have a good chance.
[post="178907"][/post]​

I think a judge will see WN as an apples to oranges comparison.

I think a judge will see that U has made bad choices over the last 2 decades and allow U management an opportunity to fix them

I think a judge will see how U management in the last 12 months has put forward real changes that were resisted for years (fares, PIT, even recent ccy layoffs, etc) and that these changes cost money. That the necessary tranformation will require some downsizing because there aren't creditors willing and able to transform AND grow U. They want to see transform first.

Unless there is evidence that U really put forward a proposal that labor has accepted and then renegged, I don't see a judge finding bad faith negotiations. What I've gleened from these boards is that labor has never met U's ask and U's ask has become more harsh as time and conditions pass. I think that might be tough negotiations, but I'm not sold on the bad faith.

Good luck, anyhow.
 
You seem to forget the unionized employees all ready gave $2.4 billion and 20,000 less jobs in the last two years.

And the management who has made the bad decisions walked away with over $42 million to messer, Wolf, Gangwal, Nagin, Seigel and Cohen.
 
I agree that Labor costs are Not the root of the problem here. It is the way the Company is structured. It is no secret that WN pays a lot more for C/S and F/S than US does, and makes a profit at the same time. None of the LCC's have a bunch of RJ's with a majority of the out stations at Express Wages either. For this Company it has become a habit to attack labor, instead of trying other ways to become profitable. They did nothing constructive with the 2 rounds of Concessions, and there is no reason to think this time will be any different either.
The Management of this Airline has proved that they have no Clue as how to run an Airline. One must ask why a CEO with "0" Airline knowledge was put at the helm in times like these. With the poor Management that has been here for the past 15 years, they don't know any better.
 
What seems to be forgotten is the different marketplace that exists today than even after the first bk emergence. The judge has one thing and only one thing in mind when he/she will make a decision. What is in the best interest of those that are owed money and how can we get them the most money back not how much have the employees given and how much have they suffered.
 
wings396 said:
I agree that Labor costs are Not the root of the problem here. It is the way the Company is structured. It is no secret that WN pays a lot more for C/S and F/S than US does, and makes a profit at the same time. None of the LCC's have a bunch of RJ's with a majority of the out stations at Express Wages either. For this Company it has become a habit to attack labor, instead of trying other ways to become profitable. They did nothing constructive with the 2 rounds of Concessions, and there is no reason to think this time will be any different either.
The Management of this Airline has proved that they have no Clue as how to run an Airline. One must ask why a CEO with "0" Airline knowledge was put at the helm in times like these. With the poor Management that has been here for the past 15 years, they don't know any better.
[post="178917"][/post]​

Well said...If I can offer my .02 here, I'd say the biggest difference between, say, US or NW, and WN is the productivity of the workers/equipment/facilities. As an example at my station we (NW) have 3 gates for 6 daily depts. One is used only once a day. WN has 4 gates, but 33 (maybe more now?) flts. a day.

FWIW, NW was quite big on comparing us to WN to make their case for concessions until it was pointed out that they out earn us. Now it's HP/B6....