BlacknBlue, don't waste your time with these people. Lord knows, I learned about that this week.
Then why are you coming back and repeating yourself? Shouldn’t you follow the advice that you are giving to B n’ B?
I'm not sure I understand the AA people fighting the UAL people on the DELTA board, thank-you-very-much BUT the anti-union DL f/a's are a group of about 4-6 people, same ones as six years ago who until recently were in hiding.
So, what is your source on this? I am anti afa, and I wasn’t there. Shouldn't your count be adjusted up by one? If up by one, how far up should it be? You don't really know. You are still working in your own reality.
You really should state that you are guessing when you are guessing. If you do not, it comes across as being dishonest.
The reason they have come out of hiding is because DL threw a bone to the f/a group last week (one of them being the BOD seniority letter in the event of a merger,
Did they tell you that this is the reason why they came out, or are you making this up as well? Where is your proof that this is the reason that they came out of hiding? Can you show us a document?
They also reinstated duty rigs because they HAD to...by Inflite's own admission in their comparison chart, DL f/a's fared the worst in this category when compared to other airlines).
Great! Why should we have a union when In-Flight is trying to catch us up with everyone else
Secondly, I have done some research and found out that they are from a asite called Deltafa.org/4FreedomForce.com
Research? Great. I like research. Please, do quote your research. Remember, at least in academia, research is punctuated by citations to independently verifiable sources to support the research. This prevents academic fraud and the pulling of facts out of one’s own . . . Please cite independently verifiable sources. This way we can be assured that you are not making up your facts to support what you believe. Remember, the key is independently verifiable.
DL AFA activists have invited them to sit down to a debate and they have refused because they like to stay in the closet with their identities unknown.
Why debate? The afa-CWA campaign is sputtering. It needs publicity. Let it wither on an unnoticed vine.
When they are challenged and found to be factually incorrect, they don't respond, even on their own message boards. They NEVER respond to the tough questions (such as one I posed: "did you ever imagine USAIRWAYS would try to takeover Delta?")
You think that is a tough question? It is a cream puff, and it is not relevant. Any one can try to take over anything. The real question is will it be successful?
Also, what is your posting name on deltafa.org talk? As of this morning, I did not see your post of that question. Are you making that up too?
Anyway, this is my last week here, at least on this subject......it's a total waste of time. (Their FreedomForce boards are even more- so because they have very few readers.) You'll see what I'm talking about.
If it is a waste of time, do you not have anything better to do that you come and participate in what you call a “total waste of time?†The fact that you are back indicates a certain level of dishonesty here as well. You call it a waste of time, yet your coming back indicates that you must think it worth your time.
Also, it is ironic that you come, make a few unsupported statements, and then move on. Isn’t that what you accuse the anti-afa crowd of doing? Aren’t you being a bit hypocritical?
