Glenn Quagmire
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,809
- Reaction score
- 4,343
The LA chapter of the NAACP deserves the hypocrisy of the decade award. Imagine Al Sharpton and Sterling receiving the same award. Seems fitting at this point.
No he is a franchisee from the NBA.delldude said:
Dude, he is the company.
700UW said:No he is a franchisee from the NBA.
eolesen said:Mirroring the Chinese methods of retaliation is OK with you?...
eolesen said:The difference is the NBA and the players aren't paying Sterling's salary. He's paying them. He bought the franchise, and pays into the NBA annually.
The allegations are that Sterling violated an established code of conduct, yet Sterling was no stranger to race allegations, and the league never took any action before this week?... Please. Reactionary. Over-reaching. And I'm sure there will be a lawsuit somewhere.
Yep! One's a "Racist, the other a "Race Pimp"!Glenn Quagmire said:The LA chapter of the NAACP deserves the hypocrisy of the decade award. Imagine Al Sharpton and Sterling receiving the same award. Seems fitting at this point.
$2500 and/or a year in jail. However, this could be costly for the lady:777 fixer said:Wonder if the DA is going to press charges?
http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/california-recording-law
Glenn Quagmire said:$2500 and/or a year in jail. However, this could be costly for the lady:
"637.2. (a) Any person who has been injured by a violation of this
chapter may bring an action against the person who committed the
violation for the greater of the following amounts:
(1) Five thousand dollars ($5,000).
(2) Three times the amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by
the plaintiff.
( b ) Any person may, in accordance with Chapter 3 (commencing with
Section 525) of Title 7 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
bring an action to enjoin and restrain any violation of this chapter,
and may in the same action seek damages as provided by subdivision
(a).
( c )It is not a necessary prerequisite to an action pursuant to
this section that the plaintiff has suffered, or be threatened with,
actual damages."
Three times actual damages? Ouch.
eolesen said:In court, Silver's ban and fine will wind up being largely unenforceable. You can't prohibit someone from being involved in a business they own. About the only thing they can do is block Sterling from participating in league meetings.
Maybe you should bow out of the prediction business.eolesen said:You'll hear outrage, apologies, a large donation made to some politically acceptable charity, and short of someone buying out his ownership stake, that will be about it. The NBA can fine or suspend him from "day to day operations" but that's about it. They can't force him out. Since the team is worth $575B, I doubt anyone will be stepping up to buy him out on impulse, and in the end, he'll still make money out of the deal.
eolesen said:Make no mistake - the guy is a dirtbag, and he'll be dead before any of it gets resolved.
777 fixer said:
I'm thinking that the NBA is wishing they had done a better job vetting Mr. Sterling.
There can be no debate that the words of Mr. Sterling were reprehensible and disgusting. But how and why did these words come to light now, when his points of view were apparently well-known for many years?
It seems his “girlfriend,” Ms. Stiviano, decided to tape a private conversation between the two. Apparently, Ms. Stiviano had recently been sued by the estranged wife of Mr. Sterling, so there is some potential nefarious motive involved. Furthermore, the taping of a conversation without consent of the other party is illegal under California statute. There is some question as to whether he knew he was being recorded. Let’s assume for the moment he didn’t.
The national outrage against Mr. Sterling has come from an act that could be illegal and inadmissible in a court of law. Nevertheless, the court of public opinion has tried and convicted Mr. Sterling of being a jerk.
So where do we go from here?
Have we come to the point that private conversations can be taped and released in the public domain in order to ruin the livelihood –pursuit of happiness — of private citizens? Ms. Stiviano, or whomever, knew exactly what they wanted the end result to be as they released this tape to TMZ.
Is this the “new normal?” Is this a violation of our privacy rights? Ok, so what types of conversations occur in the privacy of the NBA locker rooms, or the homes of the players? Yes, this is indeed a slippery slope as Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban asserted.