RIF due to restructuring December 2012 and February 2013. RIF due to workload adjustments May and September 2013.
Posible situation AMT A with 20 years seniority goes in first round (Dec/12) and have the option of going to DFW later AMT B with 24 years seniority goes in the fourth round (Sep/13) and will like to go to DFW but that is not an option at that time he will have to go to LAX. Do this can be avoided so seniority is really honored? Or TWU is going to said though luck brother? Is not better to do all the RIF at once and defer the report date so seniority is really honored?
Will like to know opinions on how to do this fairly.
Or maybe the virual RIF goes something like this...
Mechanic XYZ gets his layoff notice and fills out his "wish" list.
His choices are, say, 1)DFW, 2)MIA. 3)ORD....
He and all the other mechancis getting laid off the first round fill out their wish lists as well.
All the requests get sorted out in seniority order.
Mechanic XYZ gets a notice saying he cannot hold DFW, the 2nd round of requests go back into the sorter and he wants MIA as his 2nd choice..
He is finally informed that he cannot hold DFW or MIA and will wind up in ORD and that is where he/she WILL be going.
All this was done without ever having made a move to DFW and/or MIA in the first place.
Even the new contract language states that layoffs will be done based on occupational seniority.
As long as it is done respecting seniority, maybe it is not a bad thing after all.
Look at it this way....If mechanic XYZ got laid off and bumps to DFW, maybe he/she looks for a place to live..Signs a lease, puts $$$ down as per the terms of the lease and three weeks later gets bumped out of DFW......Same thing happens if he bumps again to MIA....Better to make the move once rather than several times.
Then again, who knows.