Election year 2020

[KCFlyer]

I have a different view than you.

I think most Christians strive for perfection (a goal they will NEVER reach) but they don't EXPECT perfection of others. Most Christians accept that ALL people are flawed and accept that ALL people sin.

It has been said let he without sin cast the first stone, so why do you criticize those that don't cast stones?

You criticize those Christians who judge and those who don't. Seems like an unwinnable situation with you.

I think you also confuse refusing to accept (like say, homosexuality for instance) as judging others instead of distancing oneself from the offense. It's like parents who have a child hooked on drugs. They do what they can to help them but eventually they start to distance themselves. They still love their child but they can't allow their child to poison them and their home through their bad decisions and addiction. Especially if they have other children present in the home.

Trump is not a perfect person by any means but certain people support him because they see him as the best of a bad situation. They can't control who runs for president they can only show support for who they feel like most represents their agenda or values, even if that representation is minimal.

I am sure you yourself have voted for people you did not particularly care for simply because in your mind that was the best option available at the time.

I can tell you this.... I would vote for Trump over Hillary any day of the week. Would you rather Hillary of the Clinton Crime Syndicate have won? She has more baggage than a fully loaded AIrbus A380. Or, were you willing to ignore that baggage because her agenda and values were more aligned with yours than Trumps. Do you get where I am coming from? You are literally chastising "Trump Supporters" for doing EXACTLY what you were willing to do yourself. That sir, makes you a hypocrite.

OH...now it's less than perfect. It's nice. But somehow, when it comes to two men or two women who wish to get married....something that has ZERO impact on you, the religious types are adamant that we cannot tolerate this. If a man or a woman simply says "I'm gay", they are an abomination. Not less than perfect - an abomination since the bible says they are.

Then we have a candidate...a married man who brags that he just can't help himself...he just starts kissing them. Keeps breath mints handy just in case. And he boasts of the fact that when you are rich, women will let you grab them by their nether regions. Even when you are married. And that's just "less than perfect"....even thought the chapter of the bible they cite to call homosexuality an abomination has some pretty darn clear views on adultery.

And it's great - Trump isn't perfect but was better than Hillary. I would think that the preachers, whom a lot of voters follow like good little members of the flock (isn't that what they call a group of sheep?) would actually endorse this person for his blatant violations of not just Leviticus, but of 7 of the 10 commandments. They should have stayed on the sidelines and let there lost little members make their decision without having the guidance from a "man of God". Because there WAS a third party candidate they could have voted for.

I kind of wish that Mayor Pete would have been the Democratic candidate. I would LOVE to see what the "religious" who accept an amoral candidate by saying he's "less than perfect" would have to say about a gay candidate - and how many times they would cite the bible.

 

[Insp4]

Ok Hypocrite ,sorry if call you a name offends you but it’s the truth

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

OH...now it's less than perfect. It's nice. But somehow, when it comes to two men or two women who wish to get married....something that has ZERO impact on you, the religious types are adamant that we cannot tolerate this. If a man or a woman simply says "I'm gay", they are an abomination. Not less than perfect - an abomination since the bible says they are.

I did not say throw them off the roof fool, I said distance yourself from the offense. Big difference. If you have an issue with tolerance go tell it to a Muslim you gutless coward (who actually ARE throwing gays off roofs).

Then we have a candidate...a married man who brags that he just can't help himself...he just starts kissing them. Keeps breath mints handy just in case. And he boasts of the fact that when you are rich, women will let you grab them by their nether regions. Even when you are married. And that's just "less than perfect"....even thought the chapter of the bible they cite to call homosexuality an abomination has some pretty darn clear views on adultery.

Next time they have an adultery pride parade let me know.

And it's great - Trump isn't perfect but was better than Hillary. I would think that the preachers, whom a lot of voters follow like good little members of the flock (isn't that what they call a group of sheep?) would actually endorse this person for his blatant violations of not just Leviticus, but of 7 of the 10 commandments. They should have stayed on the sidelines and let there lost little members make their decision without having the guidance from a "man of God". Because there WAS a third party candidate they could have voted for.

Yes. He was better than Hillary.

I don't see your disdain for UNIONS telling their members to vote Democrat, which they absolutely do.

I kind of wish that Mayor Pete would have been the Democratic candidate. I would LOVE to see what the "religious" who accept an amoral candidate by saying he's "less than perfect" would have to say about a gay candidate - and how many times they would cite the bible.

You act like religious people are the only ones who have an issue with gays.

Some people find homosexuality simply unnatural or illogical. Basic biology states that a male and a female produce children through intercourse. That is a physiological truth that cannot be denied. What do you get when you have a bunch of liberals pushing an agenda? You get a bunch fools denying basic biological truths in favor of a fabricated leftist fantasy. I read 3 magazine articles the other day referencing cisgender........ If that is not mass media trying to socially engineer change of culture and tradition to fit a leftist agenda I don't know what is. For some people it is not the gays. themselves they despise and resent, it is their manipulation tactics and hypocrisy.

Then there are their liberal supporters who claim to value equal rights but want the government to designate them as a protected group.

So keeping score here gays, minorities, minority religions, and women are all protected groups. So basically everybody is in a protected group except straight, white, Christain, males. And you douchebag liberals want to call that EQUAL RIGHTS. What a joke that is and what a fool you are for subscribing to it.

 

[Dog Wonder]

I get the Old White Guy pass every time I leave the house. Your oppression is in your head.

 

[KCFlyer]

I did not say throw them off the roof fool, I said distance yourself from the offense. Big difference. If you have an issue with tolerance go tell it to a Muslim you gutless coward (who actually ARE throwing gays off roofs).

Next time they have an adultery pride parade let me know.

Excuse me, but where did I defend Muslims? But I didn't see any Muslim leaders encouraging their flocks to vote for either candidate. Christian leaders should take note.

Yes. He was better than Hillary.

There was a third party candidate they could have thrown their support behind. OR...they could have stayed on the sidelines....like the Muslim leaders

I don't see your disdain for UNIONS telling their members to vote Democrat, which they absolutely do.

Unions don't condemn gays or serial adulterers either.

You act like religious people are the only ones who have an issue with gays.

They aren't. However, they ARE the ones who use this book to condemn gays, but overlook what that same book has to say about other sins.

Some people find homosexuality simply unnatural or illogical. Basic biology states that a male and a female produce children through intercourse. That is a physiological truth that cannot be denied. What do you get when you have a bunch of liberals pushing an agenda? You get a bunch fools denying basic biological truths in favor of a fabricated leftist fantasy. I read 3 magazine articles the other day referencing cisgender........ If that is not mass media trying to socially engineer change of culture and tradition to fit a leftist agenda I don't know what is. For some people it is not the gays. themselves they despise and resent, it is their manipulation tactics and hypocrisy.

You know, there are two gay guys that live behind me. They aren't having sex in the back yard...they mow and rake back there, just like "normal" people. Tell me...how exactly does what two consenting adults do behind closed doors negatively impact your life? Is it because some might use the anus for sex? What if the hetero couple next do to them do the same thing....is it the anal sex that is bad, or does the fact that one of them lack a penis make it more acceptable. Same thing for oral sex.

Then there are their liberal supporters who claim to value equal rights but want the government to designate them as a protected group.

I guess because with guys like you in their workplace, it's easy to fire them for their sex habits at home.

So keeping score here gays, minorities, minority religions, and women are all protected groups. So basically everybody is in a protected group except straight, white, Christain, males. And you douchebag liberals want to call that EQUAL RIGHTS. What a joke that is and what a fool you are for subscribing to it.

I think I fell away from "Chrisitan" beliefs, but I'm still a straight white male, so I'm in there with you.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Excuse me, but where did I defend Muslims?

I didn't say you defend them. I said you don't criticize them like you do Christians, and you don't.

But I didn't see any Muslim leaders encouraging their flocks to vote for either candidate. Christian leaders should take note.

They don't need to. They have Democrats APPOINTING them to positions of power. My bet is the Clinton's and Obama's have a lot of that Middle Eastern oil money in their piggy bank.

There was a third party candidate they could have thrown their support behind. OR...they could have stayed on the sidelines....like the Muslim leaders

They are too busy funding al qaeda and hamas.

Unions don't condemn gays or serial adulterers either.

No, they just tell their sheeple how to vote.

They aren't. However, they ARE the ones who use this book to condemn gays, but overlook what that same book has to say about other sins.

Some of them do and some of them don't. Of course you choose to focus on what fits your narrative despite most Christians being very accepting of gays.

You know, there are two gay guys that live behind me.

I bet they do. 😀

They aren't having sex in the back yard...they mow and rake back there, just like "normal" people. Tell me...how exactly does what two consenting adults do behind closed doors negatively impact your life?

Having a Pride parade down main street and reading media designed to push a homosexual agenda to children in public libraries is not behind closed doors.

Is it because some might use the anus for sex? What if the hetero couple next do to them do the same thing....is it the anal sex that is bad, or does the fact that one of them lack a penis make it more acceptable. Same thing for oral sex.

Again there are certain biological and physiological truths and I won't be forced to repeat a lie just to fuel someone's fantasy.

I guess because with guys like you in their workplace, it's easy to fire them for their sex habits at home.

I don't concern myself with my coworkers home life. Unfortunately they most often don't leave it at home. Most businesses send out propaganda for gay pride week and have groups for homosexuals (American Airlines does). I guess that is more of that "equality" at work.

I think I fell away from "Chrisitan" beliefs, but I'm still a straight white male, so I'm in there with you.

Don't compare yourself with me. You and I are nothing alike.

 

[Dog Wonder]

LaLa is definitely not your normal white straight male.

 

[KCFlyer]

No, they just tell their sheeple how to vote.

Like religions?

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Like religions?

I have NEVER had a religious organization tell me how to vote.

UNION members HAVE "encourage me" (and by that I mean the implementation of fear tactics) to vote a certain way.

If you have had a church tell you how to vote then your experience has been much different than mine.

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

And W T F ....should i refer to Fox news, Rush Limbo and Sean Hannity as ???

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

So this is what the Democrats are up to: https://www.news.bizwiznews.com/pelosi-to-seniors-you-are-not-entitled-to-social-security-its-gone/

I don't think this is legit.

I hate Democrats just as much as any sane person but this story reeks of fiction and absurdity.

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

I have NEVER had a religious organization tell me how to vote.

UNION members HAVE "encourage me" (and by that I mean the implementation of fear tactics) to vote a certain way.

If you have had a church tell you how to vote then your experience has been much different than mine.

La Li Lu Le Lo.

I think you've said at an earlier time, that your spouse was a F/A.
So, If I'm correct, YOU(when you were working) and your spouse, would Never have been earning the wages or benefits, if it were not for the respective Unions ! AND THAT, YOU 'K N O W' !

The Democrats support UNIONS, because among other things, the UNIONS, by 'leaps and bounds', created the Middle Class. So therefore, naturally Union members don't want to lose your vote, AND THAT, YOU 'KNOW'

The GOP HATES Unions because Corporations(They contribute a TON of their money to the GOP) lose a lot of control $$$$$, over their workers. AND THAT, YOU 'KNOW' !

And while Christian Churches (from the pulpit, may not tell you to vote for Trump), they SURE-AS-HELLL beat-you-over-your-head with their PRO LIFE ( A K A....ABORTION) Stance ! AND THAT, (my friend), YOU 'KNOW' !!

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

I don't think this is legit.

I have Democrats just as much as any sane person but this story reeks of fiction and absurdity.

La Li LU Le Lo.

OF COURSE it's Fiction and Absurdity !
Just look at the Lame-Brain who Posted it !!!

 

[Insp4]

I don't think this is legit.

I have Democrats just as much as any sane person but this story reeks of fiction and absurdity.

You may be right!........ Well delete it. But I wouldn't be surprised if true!

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

I think you've said at an earlier time, that your spouse was a F/A.
So, If I'm correct, YOU(when you were working) and your spouse, would Never have been earning the wages or benefits, if it were not for the respective Unions ! AND THAT, YOU 'K N O W' !

Actually she is an OSM.

I agree I would not have made near the money or benefits doing that sort of work without the UNION.

The Democrats support UNIONS, because among other things, the UNIONS, by 'leaps and bounds', created the Middle Class. So therefore, naturally Union members don't want to lose your vote, AND THAT, YOU 'KNOW'

No Bears. The Democrats support UNIONs because the UNIONs line their pockets with UNION dues money. For that the UNION expects certain..... "considerations".

Don't mistake political favors for loyalty.

The GOP HATES Unions because Corporations(They contribute a TON of their money to the GOP) lose a lot of control $$$$$, over their workers. AND THAT, YOU 'KNOW' !

I don't think it is that simple. I think the GOP hates UNIONs because they propagate socialist/communist ideals. That and they contribute considerable capital to political and social agendas the GOP finds distasteful that have NOTHING to do with labor.

And while Christian Churches (from the pulpit, may not tell you to vote for Trump), they SURE-AS-HELLL beat-you-over-your-head with their PRO LIFE ( A K A....ABORTION) Stance ! AND THAT, (my friend), YOU 'KNOW' !!

There are MANY people that are not Christian or even religious that find abortion reprehensible.

I feel abortion is justified only in cases of rape or the mother facing loss of life. My attitude is if you are adult enough to spread your legs you are adult enough to deal with the consequences of that decision. You should not be allowed to kill someone else as a matter of convenience.

You realize there have been 54 MILLION abortions in the United States since 1970 bears (50 years)? Our total population as of 2019 is estimated to be 328 MILLION. Do the math that is 16.5 percent of our TOTAL population. How can ANYONE justify killing off 16.5 percent of our population? Take a minute and think about that. 16.5 percent of our population aborted in 50 years (based on CDC records).

The country is only 243 years old and the American Indians were here long before 1776. It took us 243 plus years to reach 328 million and only 50 to abort 54 million. I mean really, just take a second and let that sink in. Do you find that alarming? You should.

It also pisses me off that the father's rights are not even an afterthought.

Now looking at what I have stated do you find religious justification in any of that?

Columbia has about 50 million people. In the last 50 years we have aborted the population of Columbia.

Don't take my word for ANY of this. Feel free to research those numbers for yourself.