WorldTraveler said:
good perspectives but the difference between DL and both AA and UA is that DL is willing to hold onto an older fleet which does need more maintenance and at use that work inhouse. It might be true that AA and UA insource and the US legacies become the MROs of choice over others but there is no evidence so far that is happening.
I don't really think AA and UA are going to become the MROs like DL is and will become. At the end of the day they don't have the productivity to pay Delta pay but keep CASM low. That is why Delta has a ~10 cent CASM advantage on the MX side compared to AA and UA.
I do think AA and UA will be doing more of their own work in-house though
WorldTraveler said:
and you are absolutely right that DL is moving rapidly to snap up qualified pilots and is ready to do the same with mechanics because there simply won't be enough to support the needs of the industry including the ME3 and other airlines in East Asia.
the ME3 and Asian carriers aren't a threat to taking A&Ps like they are with pilots.
WorldTraveler said:
As for Airbus capabilities, I have a feeling that DL made it clear as part of the 50 widebody aircraft order that it wanted to increase its MRO capabilities and would use whatever deal to help do that - but also wanted Airbus' help with existing aircraft; I wouldn't be surprised if that is why the 332s got increased TOWs and the 320s got a life extension.
Well Delta was growing Airbus work pre-order. I mean its only logical. Delta has the volume with its own work to offer economies of scale to customers.
WorldTraveler said:
and DL gains a lot more inhouse capabilities and the ability to do more of its own work inhouse
economics of scale. Is Delta ever going to become a Trent 700 overhaul center? no. They don't have the volume in the fleet to support it.
but they will have 50 each of the Trent XWB and Trent 7000. Plenty of engines to start those lines.
The RJ side they have the volume thanks to 9E and DCI.
WorldTraveler said:
and your point about labor costs going up in other parts of the world means that DL really does have the ability to serve markets with its own aircraft but do work on a competitive basis with other MROs.
Of course we do. Productivity is key here.
I told you, LAN, UPS, HA, GOL etc. etc. etc. aren't doing work with TechOps because they can't do math, its because we are comparable in costs, offer industry leading reliability and have the economies of scale in what we are doing.
WorldTraveler said:
the key bottom line in your post and what is happening in Tech Ops is that DL is once again leading the industry in strategically thinking forward and adapting the business to it.
I agree. I believe 100% in growing TechOps for Delta, but also for the MRO.
700UW said:
Hate to tell you this DL outsources every heavy check over a C.
We already know this, but I'm not sure what that has to do with the new engine shop......