I''m all for a democratic system that allows everyone to vote and then everyone accepts the outcome. In a vote that results in 1938 - 1933, I''m a little suspicious why people who are not elidgible to vote had the opportunity. Especially when these folks only have something to gain by the TA (extended NON-REV...). This may have resulted in an invalid result. Maybe just me, but I find it very suspicious.
To respond to another quote on another thread A promise to NO voters
----------------
On 1/10/2003 9:27:13 AM chipmunn wrote:
...with the UAL vs. IAM decision it wouldn''t surprise me to see the company take the funds planned for IAM/AFA pension restoration and use them to help fund the pilots retirement plan...
Chip ----------------
Don''t worry, they may come back for more as the pension is still the largest obstacle to overcome.
LOL
Schwanker
To respond to another quote on another thread A promise to NO voters
----------------
On 1/10/2003 9:27:13 AM chipmunn wrote:
...with the UAL vs. IAM decision it wouldn''t surprise me to see the company take the funds planned for IAM/AFA pension restoration and use them to help fund the pilots retirement plan...
Chip ----------------
Don''t worry, they may come back for more as the pension is still the largest obstacle to overcome.
LOL
Schwanker