North by Northwest
Veteran
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br31mdP8-Ug
His inability to answer should be enough to tell you their intentions. :angry:
His inability to answer should be enough to tell you their intentions. :angry:
George Bush's answer on getting rid of the USA
- Thread starter North by Northwest
- Start date
777 fixer
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2004
- Messages
- 4,792
- Reaction score
- 900
I think it has more to do with the fact that he's a terrible public speaker than anything else.
North by Northwest
Veteran
My point was to demonstrate his double speak. He did NOT answer the question. He evaded the answer by speaking in circles to the point that even he became confused.
If there was not a secret agenda, he would have answered the question with a " yes, I will go on record and say I have no intention of forming a NA Free Trade zone" He didn't...on purpose.
Beyond that..there has been a marked decline in his behavior over the last 10 years. (there is an obvious outline of a receiver under his coat in the back, he may be suffering from something that they can not tell us)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvVilAlCBYc
If there was not a secret agenda, he would have answered the question with a " yes, I will go on record and say I have no intention of forming a NA Free Trade zone" He didn't...on purpose.
Beyond that..there has been a marked decline in his behavior over the last 10 years. (there is an obvious outline of a receiver under his coat in the back, he may be suffering from something that they can not tell us)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvVilAlCBYc
North by Northwest
Veteran
Obviously, neither party should have supported this piece of (&-*&!
The Canadians pretty much brag about this pending "Union" Superhighway....the one Washington laughs about as a joke. Ya think the plan to allow raggedy Mexican trucks onto US highways has anything to do with it?
Notice how they try to laugh off the facts. He's amused...he IS amusing, if he wasn't so dangerous.
The Canadians pretty much brag about this pending "Union" Superhighway....the one Washington laughs about as a joke. Ya think the plan to allow raggedy Mexican trucks onto US highways has anything to do with it?
Notice how they try to laugh off the facts. He's amused...he IS amusing, if he wasn't so dangerous.
Ronald Regan had the vision and opened the door.
Article
Long-Standing Support for Free Trade with Mexico. Ronald Reagan first proposed a free trade agreement between the U.S. and Mexico in his 1980 presidential campaign. Since that time, The Heritage Foundation is proud of the role it has played in articulating President Reagan's vision of free trade in Latin America and around the world. Since the mid-1980s, Heritage analysts have been stressing that a free trade agreement with Mexico not only will stimulate economic growth in the U.S., but will make Mexico a more stable and prosperous country. Heritage has published over three dozen studies stressing the benefits of free trade in North America.
Don't let your sons grow up to be Cowboys...
Article
Long-Standing Support for Free Trade with Mexico. Ronald Reagan first proposed a free trade agreement between the U.S. and Mexico in his 1980 presidential campaign. Since that time, The Heritage Foundation is proud of the role it has played in articulating President Reagan's vision of free trade in Latin America and around the world. Since the mid-1980s, Heritage analysts have been stressing that a free trade agreement with Mexico not only will stimulate economic growth in the U.S., but will make Mexico a more stable and prosperous country. Heritage has published over three dozen studies stressing the benefits of free trade in North America.
Don't let your sons grow up to be Cowboys...
MMB
Senior
It's not just American ports that are fast slipping into foreign ownership; it's highways, too. A Spanish company, Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., has bought the right to operate a tollroad through Texas and collect tolls for the next 50 years.
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2006/aug06/06-08-23.html
By now many Texans have heard about the proposed ìNAFTA Superhighway,î which is also referred to as the trans-Texas corridor. What you may not know is the extent to which plans for such a superhighway are moving forward without congressional oversight or media attention.
This superhighway would connect Mexico, the United States, and Canada, cutting a wide swath through the middle of Texas and up through Kansas City. Offshoots would connect the main artery to the west coast, Florida, and northeast. Proponents envision a ten-lane colossus the width of several football fields, with freight and rail lines, fiber-optic cable lines, and oil and natural gas pipelines running alongside.
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2006/tst103006.htm
And this NAFTA Superhighway, as it is called, is just the beginning, the first stage of a long, silent coup aimed at supplanting the sovereign United States with a multinational North American Union.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070827/hayes
Its present scope is 4,000 miles long, 1,200 feet wide, with an estimated cost of $183 billion of taxpayer funds.
One of the most striking features of the proposed Super Highway is the plan to do away with our borders, as evidenced by the joint U.S.-Mexico Customs facility already under construction in Kansas City, Missouri.
http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/nafta...ing_through.htm
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2006/aug06/06-08-23.html
By now many Texans have heard about the proposed ìNAFTA Superhighway,î which is also referred to as the trans-Texas corridor. What you may not know is the extent to which plans for such a superhighway are moving forward without congressional oversight or media attention.
This superhighway would connect Mexico, the United States, and Canada, cutting a wide swath through the middle of Texas and up through Kansas City. Offshoots would connect the main artery to the west coast, Florida, and northeast. Proponents envision a ten-lane colossus the width of several football fields, with freight and rail lines, fiber-optic cable lines, and oil and natural gas pipelines running alongside.
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2006/tst103006.htm
And this NAFTA Superhighway, as it is called, is just the beginning, the first stage of a long, silent coup aimed at supplanting the sovereign United States with a multinational North American Union.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070827/hayes
Its present scope is 4,000 miles long, 1,200 feet wide, with an estimated cost of $183 billion of taxpayer funds.
One of the most striking features of the proposed Super Highway is the plan to do away with our borders, as evidenced by the joint U.S.-Mexico Customs facility already under construction in Kansas City, Missouri.
http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/nafta...ing_through.htm
NAFTA Accountability Bill Draws Bipartisan Support
Long-time labor ally Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) introduced legislation in the House of Representatives this week that would require the United States to withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) if new negotiations do not produce specific, concrete improvements.
“For nearly fourteen years, NAFTA has reneged on its promises, bringing even more poverty and job loss to communities across the continent,†said Kaptur. “I join my colleagues from Maine to California in demanding a new, equitable model for free trade among free peoples.â€
The North American Free Trade Agreement Accountability Act, H.R. 4329, drew support from Democrats and Republicans.
“Since its enactment, NAFTA has failed to deliver the economic success that it initially promised,†said Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). “Our growing trade deficits with Mexico and Canada, and the continued loss of American jobs provide enough evidence to indicate that NAFTA just isn’t working. It is time that we accept this reality and begin renegotiating this trade agreement to better and more fairly serve America’s interests.â€
The bill would require the Executive Branch to certify that certain benchmarks have been met, including gains in U.S. jobs and living standards, increased U.S. domestic manufacturing, stronger health and environmental standards. The bill also sets benchmarks regarding food imports, decreased flow of illegal drugs from Mexico and Canada, and the guarantee of Mexican democracy and human freedoms.
Long-time labor ally Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) introduced legislation in the House of Representatives this week that would require the United States to withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) if new negotiations do not produce specific, concrete improvements.
“For nearly fourteen years, NAFTA has reneged on its promises, bringing even more poverty and job loss to communities across the continent,†said Kaptur. “I join my colleagues from Maine to California in demanding a new, equitable model for free trade among free peoples.â€
The North American Free Trade Agreement Accountability Act, H.R. 4329, drew support from Democrats and Republicans.
“Since its enactment, NAFTA has failed to deliver the economic success that it initially promised,†said Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). “Our growing trade deficits with Mexico and Canada, and the continued loss of American jobs provide enough evidence to indicate that NAFTA just isn’t working. It is time that we accept this reality and begin renegotiating this trade agreement to better and more fairly serve America’s interests.â€
The bill would require the Executive Branch to certify that certain benchmarks have been met, including gains in U.S. jobs and living standards, increased U.S. domestic manufacturing, stronger health and environmental standards. The bill also sets benchmarks regarding food imports, decreased flow of illegal drugs from Mexico and Canada, and the guarantee of Mexican democracy and human freedoms.
