Leave it to you to put a pro-management spin on the situation and leave out the most telling facts--namely that the relationship started down the tubes when management took the concessions money that WE gave them in 2003 and awarded themselves bonusses instead of using the money to fix the problems. Remember the April 15th when we announced a loss for the first quarter of the year in the amount of $324 million and the same day the executives accepted $9 million in bonusses. Bonusses are for exceeding expectations, not for just not quitting and not dying. Oh, and buying a $20 million townhouse in Mayfair. Now there was an essential need if there ever was one.
And, spare me the argument that their contracts required them to accept the bonusses. Not buying that one. They could have simply said, "No, thank you. We lost a lot of money last quarter. I really couldn't in good conscience accept a bonus."
Say what you want about me if it makes you feel better, and blame management as the antagonists, but the fact still remains that the largest employee groups declared war on AA in 2005, and haven't done anything productive to improve the working relationship with management in the past seven years.
I'd love to see JetBlue come in and take over, but they obviously see their culture as being worth preserving. If AA's employees were indeed desirable, they'd hire more of them. Instead, they're being pretty selective. The day Bob Owens gets hired there, I'll retract this...
This is one of the dumbest postings I ever read. Blaming the toxic relationship between management and unions on the unions. Are you saying that management has no responsiblity at all for this? It was the unions that saved AA from BK in 2003, not any great management decision like buying TWA. I could go on but why waste my time, the union people know the truth. Owens is one guy soon to lose his power as a local president, to say we are all antagonists is lame at best.
Leave it to you to put a pro-management spin on the situation and leave out the most telling facts--namely that the relationship started down the tubes when management took the concessions money that WE gave them in 2003 and awarded themselves bonusses instead of using the money to fix the problems.
Been there done that.....You end up home alone waxing your salami !!! Semper Fi !!!
[background=rgb(255, 255, 51)]So, do you know how much faster I could fix an airplane when I wanted to fix it, than when I didn't want to fix it? And that's the edge that your employees can give you -- if they want to do something. It's the same thing with your girlfriend. If you take your girlfriend for granted, she'll show you -- one way or another --that you probably shouldn't have done that."[/background]
This is one of the dumbest postings I ever read. Blaming the toxic relationship between management and unions on the unions. Are you saying that management has no responsiblity at all for this? It was the unions that saved AA from BK in 2003, not any great management decision like buying TWA. I could go on but why waste my time, the union people know the truth. Owens is one guy soon to lose his power as a local president, to say we are all antagonists is lame at best.
Been there done that.....You end up home alone waxing your salami !!! Semper Fi !!!
Good point..........but bottom line, and I think its something everyone can agree on if they think rationally, is that BOTH sides have had a part in this toxic relationship, and it will take both sides swalling their pride, forgetting the past while attmepting to see the other side's point of view if this relationship will be made whole again.
Yep, and that goes both ways....