Waxing philosophical (we do that well, don't you know

)...
When reading your post, it occurred to me that no airline name has ever achieved that pinnacle of marketing and consumer identification of becoming a generic term.
For instance, in many countries--parts of this one for that matter--coke is a generic term for soda pop/soft drink/whatever you call it. When I was growing up in the South in the 50's, your mother or your aunt might tell you, "Go get me the milk from the frigidaire (meaning the refrigerator)."
The point about Valujet is well-taken. There seems to be no problem whatsoever in the public's mind of attaching negative connotations to an airline name--positive connotations seem to be the exclusive province of WN

.
Calibrator's comment about two negatives reminded me of the Senate hearings over the UAL/US proposed merger. One of the senators on the panel--and, I think it was that model of open-mindedness, Rick Santorum--said to one of the witnesses, "So, you are going to take the two most-hated airlines on the East Coast and merge them into one loved and respected airline. Exactly how is that going to work?"
I have a real problem is seeing how the HP/US deal is going to work. Not least, the issue of the unionized seniority lists. It is one thing to say, "Well, the AFA/ALPA and the AFL-CIO constitutions require strict DOH merger of the seniority lists" when you have both lists being proportionally equal--as there would be in a merger between UAL and AA or DL. It's another thing entirely when one group is predominantly senior to the other group. I don't see AW's flight attendants and pilots sitting back and watching their junior members furloughed in order to call back US furloughees. The most senior person at AW has 22 years max--AW started flying in 1983. Even the people who have been there since day 1 are going to lose seniority.
And, don't
even start with me about all the senior people at US who are going to retire/quit/take the EO. Since I came back to AA in November, all I've heard on the line is the mass retirements that were going to happen any day now.

For instance, a friend of mine who is based at the DFW International base (IDF), told me in December that he knew for a fact that there were going to be 200 retirements from IDF alone in just the first 3 months of 2005. Well, the truth is there have been only about 100 retirements in the first FOUR months of 2005 systemwide at AA--domestic and International. The truth is, we f/as just won't go away.
[post="270923"][/post]