For once I actually agree with you.USA320Pilot said:Baldanza would understandably like to run an airline and nobody cannot be replaced.[post="238353"][/post]
But I also agree with funguy: Who the heck would want to work there and take on that risk? I mean I find many of the jobs listed as open at US very interesting and intriguing (ones I am qualified for) but I sure as heck don't have the risk tolerance for them and I know the pay won't be enough to offset that risk.
Regarding the RJs, I still haven't heard why its ok for US to fly RJs around as a LCC but at the same time FlyI is losing money worse than anyone.
The optimists seem to sing the tune of "Once the transformation plan is implemented, we'll be fine." And I hope that happens. But after reading Siegel's quote as well as the one from the board member, I have to ask: Who is going to be around to oversee the implementation of the plan?
Another thought, one that might warrant a seperate thread, regarding an UCT/ICT/IUD: UA has been screwing with their BK judge, and he seems open to competing business plans. Can someone do the same for US? Could TPG present a business plan to both courts planning to merge the bankrupt companies? (I honestly have no idea and don't know too much about the BK proceedings)