What's new

Islam Watch

Just like I thought, not one single answer to any of my questions only more left liberal spin. Your so full of sh!t, I bet people have to wear boots just to hang around you.

I watch every news network, including your liberal left networks who do nothing but spin, never showing America in a favorable light but defending the enemy like the rest of you Tokyo Rose jane fonda dan rather loving traitors.

You are a Fukking Liar, except for a few, not even a handful there is no outcry from the muslim world how their religion is breading hatred and advocating genocide. Im starting to think you are one, maybe the next terrorist attack will personally visit you like it did so many others in this country on 9/11.
http://www.suntimes.com/output/laney/cst-edt-laney18.html

My, my...you aren't going to live a very long life with that kind of anger pent up. Perhaps your hatred of all non-whitebread folks is not such a good thing.

As far as your rhetoricals go...they were just that...spun rhetoricals with no merit. I didn't realize I was supposed to respond to elementary school tactics. Your questions aren't even based on truth so what is the point? You are close minded and get way too frustrated and angry at anyone that doesn't think exactly like you.

You questions?! I answered your first one about "accepting at face value". Hell yes I accept at face value the articles that I post that are FACT. What I posted was based on real history and was not just an amateur website designed to spew hate that only has untraceable claims of who is behind it. My article was based on fact and easily verifiable. Your website was not. Sure...it may be true...but it also may not be. No real way to know. The fact that you can so eagerly throw discretion to the wind and subscribe to something unverifiable says alot. I like things that you can verify with fact. I don't blindly jump on whatever train just b/c it is painted in the tint that I prefer.

Other "questions"? "spreading islam by the sword" is actually a quote from a medival islamic king that forced that issue...not any Islamic prophet. Some day we may look back at our "king" and see that he is spreading Christianity with the sword. Just b/c that is our team, does that make it right? And Israel spreads Judaism with the sword. Problem is...you have the most faithful of several major religions living in one small region...hotbed of "spreading by the sword". Perhaps if you understood where quotes came from rather than just attaching them to an entire race of people you would come across much better but you are too quick to try to make a meaning out of something that you don't understand that you ignore the truths.

What else? Leaving evil unchecked? Nope...I never said that. But Iraq had NOTHING....NOTHING to do with 9/11. Afghanistan...well yeah...they were ruled by a group closely aligned with Bin Laden. Iraq? Nope. Saddam tried to arrest Bin Laden. So how is inflicting martial law on a country supposed to help? All that the citizens there see is our tanks rolling through the streets and our armies interrogating and fighting their people. So now a group that was NOT aligned with Bin Laden (of course there are some radicals...but we have those in the US, too) that is growing more and more distant from the U.S. We are breeding terrorism right into Iraq. I'll give credit to your buddy the Gipper for how Libya was handled. We did not have to take over a country nor did we have to do a regime change but Gadhafi sure has no world influence these days, does he? We aren't patrolling Libya and we aren't stirring the pot with rhetoric. We aren't labelling the entire country a state of terrorists therefore not further alienating future generations of Libyans. I hate to say it but Iraq is growing to hate us more and more. Whatever "joys" they gained from liberation are 5 years removed and they now see a long-term occupation and intrusion into their culture and their lives. If Saudi Arabia were occupying the U.S. since the beginning or 2002, I think I would become pretty extreme and I would teach my children to hate the oppresors as well. Sure, from our side we can say that the Iraqis should be thankful, etc, but you have to be pretty numb to human nature to believe that our extended presence with NO PLAN to change that is actually going to end well.

Finally...your question from another thread about my "plan" in Iraq? You stated in your question that you had told me your plan but really...you never did. Just what is it? "Stay the course?" That's not a plan...that is cowardice to try to figure out something that will work and benefit the world. I will give you this much...it isn't easy to come up with a plan b/c it isn't a simple, dumbed-down issue like our prez has tried to make it sound. It is complex. My thoughts? If I had a plan, I would be rich...people have been trying to figure out for thousands of years how to stabalize the region. Intelligent people can see that there is no "off" switch. You, delldude, and 700 sit here throwing out scripture and devoting every word to God. Think of how strongly you feel towards God and than think of many groups in one region that have the same devotion. Strong enough devotion to HATE those of other faiths (ala you three) and strong enough to do something about it. The ME is a powderkeg that cannot be easily calmed. "My" plan for Iraq? First…apologize to the world for our mistakes, miscalculations, underestimations, and false assumptions. Apologize for “going it alone†and not seeking a worldwide solution to Iraq. Then tell the world to shut up b/c we have some issues to correct. A little humility will go along way. And sure we have to stay in Iraq for now. But we have to have some rules. Right now our only rule is that we are there until a sufficient army is trained (say...weren't we supposed to start withdrawal when the new gov't was elected?!) We need better rules. First off...the puppet gov't is 1/3 made up of known terrorist sects. DEMAND that these groups are not given power. These are appointed posts...not elected ones. Demand that if we are to continue serving as security for the country that they align their gov't to be conducive to a decent ending. Once that is done, DEMAND from neighboring countries...even Iran and Syria...that they take a more active role in policing arms/personnel flows into Iraq. I guarantee you that Iran is not desiring another drawn out war with Iraq as the last one crippled their country for two decades. And DEMAND that Iraq take an honest approach to training and building their forces. Let the residents of Iraq see their own people patrolling their villages rather than Americans. Let them feel like THEY own their security and their future…not Americans. Let them grow a respect for their own people rather than a hatred towards Americans. And let the rest of the Middle East see that we do, indeed, want a stable and INDEPENDENT Iraq as we had pledged long ago.

We have strayed from our plan b/c we never really had one beyond removing Saddam (again…somebody that had nothing to do with 9/11…you know, the attack on the US that you keep mentioning will happen again were it not for us invading Iraq…which again…WAS NOT THE STATED REASON FOR THE WAR THERE). You keep weaving history to fit the current situation rather than admitting to mistakes and trying to correct them. My “plan†was not difficult to create and is not guaranteed but it is a lot better than staying a course that is not plotted.
 
My, my...you aren't going to live a very long life with that kind of anger pent up. Perhaps your hatred of all non-whitebread folks is not such a good thing.

As far as your rhetoricals go...they were just that...spun rhetoricals with no merit. I didn't realize I was supposed to respond to elementary school tactics. Your questions aren't even based on truth so what is the point? You are close minded and get way too frustrated and angry at anyone that doesn't think exactly like you.

You questions?! I answered your first one about "accepting at face value". Hell yes I accept at face value the articles that I post that are FACT. What I posted was based on real history and was not just an amateur website designed to spew hate that only has untraceable claims of who is behind it. My article was based on fact and easily verifiable. Your website was not. Sure...it may be true...but it also may not be. No real way to know. The fact that you can so eagerly throw discretion to the wind and subscribe to something unverifiable says alot. I like things that you can verify with fact. I don't blindly jump on whatever train just b/c it is painted in the tint that I prefer.

Other "questions"? "spreading islam by the sword" is actually a quote from a medival islamic king that forced that issue...not any Islamic prophet. Some day we may look back at our "king" and see that he is spreading Christianity with the sword. Just b/c that is our team, does that make it right? And Israel spreads Judaism with the sword. Problem is...you have the most faithful of several major religions living in one small region...hotbed of "spreading by the sword". Perhaps if you understood where quotes came from rather than just attaching them to an entire race of people you would come across much better but you are too quick to try to make a meaning out of something that you don't understand that you ignore the truths.

What else? Leaving evil unchecked? Nope...I never said that. But Iraq had NOTHING....NOTHING to do with 9/11. Afghanistan...well yeah...they were ruled by a group closely aligned with Bin Laden. Iraq? Nope. Saddam tried to arrest Bin Laden. So how is inflicting martial law on a country supposed to help? All that the citizens there see is our tanks rolling through the streets and our armies interrogating and fighting their people. So now a group that was NOT aligned with Bin Laden (of course there are some radicals...but we have those in the US, too) that is growing more and more distant from the U.S. We are breeding terrorism right into Iraq. I'll give credit to your buddy the Gipper for how Libya was handled. We did not have to take over a country nor did we have to do a regime change but Gadhafi sure has no world influence these days, does he? We aren't patrolling Libya and we aren't stirring the pot with rhetoric. We aren't labelling the entire country a state of terrorists therefore not further alienating future generations of Libyans. I hate to say it but Iraq is growing to hate us more and more. Whatever "joys" they gained from liberation are 5 years removed and they now see a long-term occupation and intrusion into their culture and their lives. If Saudi Arabia were occupying the U.S. since the beginning or 2002, I think I would become pretty extreme and I would teach my children to hate the oppresors as well. Sure, from our side we can say that the Iraqis should be thankful, etc, but you have to be pretty numb to human nature to believe that our extended presence with NO PLAN to change that is actually going to end well.

Finally...your question from another thread about my "plan" in Iraq? You stated in your question that you had told me your plan but really...you never did. Just what is it? "Stay the course?" That's not a plan...that is cowardice to try to figure out something that will work and benefit the world. I will give you this much...it isn't easy to come up with a plan b/c it isn't a simple, dumbed-down issue like our prez has tried to make it sound. It is complex. My thoughts? If I had a plan, I would be rich...people have been trying to figure out for thousands of years how to stabalize the region. Intelligent people can see that there is no "off" switch. You, delldude, and 700 sit here throwing out scripture and devoting every word to God. Think of how strongly you feel towards God and than think of many groups in one region that have the same devotion. Strong enough devotion to HATE those of other faiths (ala you three) and strong enough to do something about it. The ME is a powderkeg that cannot be easily calmed. "My" plan for Iraq? First…apologize to the world for our mistakes, miscalculations, underestimations, and false assumptions. Apologize for “going it alone†and not seeking a worldwide solution to Iraq. Then tell the world to shut up b/c we have some issues to correct. A little humility will go along way. And sure we have to stay in Iraq for now. But we have to have some rules. Right now our only rule is that we are there until a sufficient army is trained (say...weren't we supposed to start withdrawal when the new gov't was elected?!) We need better rules. First off...the puppet gov't is 1/3 made up of known terrorist sects. DEMAND that these groups are not given power. These are appointed posts...not elected ones. Demand that if we are to continue serving as security for the country that they align their gov't to be conducive to a decent ending. Once that is done, DEMAND from neighboring countries...even Iran and Syria...that they take a more active role in policing arms/personnel flows into Iraq. I guarantee you that Iran is not desiring another drawn out war with Iraq as the last one crippled their country for two decades. And DEMAND that Iraq take an honest approach to training and building their forces. Let the residents of Iraq see their own people patrolling their villages rather than Americans. Let them feel like THEY own their security and their future…not Americans. Let them grow a respect for their own people rather than a hatred towards Americans. And let the rest of the Middle East see that we do, indeed, want a stable and INDEPENDENT Iraq as we had pledged long ago.

We have strayed from our plan b/c we never really had one beyond removing Saddam (again…somebody that had nothing to do with 9/11…you know, the attack on the US that you keep mentioning will happen again were it not for us invading Iraq…which again…WAS NOT THE STATED REASON FOR THE WAR THERE). You keep weaving history to fit the current situation rather than admitting to mistakes and trying to correct them. My “plan†was not difficult to create and is not guaranteed but it is a lot better than staying a course that is not plotted.

I accept at face value the articles that I post that are FACT.

Please, give me a ‘fact’! Your subjective ‘facts’ are no more a ‘fact’ than any other subjective facts presented. There are facts and there are a distortion of facts. Even a fact proven can be subjective on how the fact is presented, justified and ‘accepted’ as a fact. Very few ‘facts’ exist in a political sense and historical ‘facts’ are conjugated almost daily.

The fact that the Crusades beat back the Muslim hordes is a fact. (Why did they have to? Love from our Muslim brothers?)

<Still no FU Smilies> UT
 
"My" plan for Iraq? First…apologize to the world for our mistakes, miscalculations, underestimations, and false assumptions.
Dont' forget reparations for slavery...and while you're apologizing...don't forget to apologize for Bill Clinton's penis.

I'll give credit to your buddy the Gipper for how Libya was handled. We did not have to take over a country nor did we have to do a regime change but Gadhafi sure has no world influence these days, does he?

Whoa.....Gipper tried to take him out while doing his morning constitutional,and missed....but the icing on the cake was Saddam pooping his pants in a hole in the ground looking into the eyes of the best trained military forces in the world on CNN and coming to the realization that he was next.

And Israel spreads Judaism with the sword.

Ahh,strictly in defence and survial of the Jewish state....

We have strayed from our plan b/c we never really had one beyond removing Saddam (again…somebody that had nothing to do with 9/11…you know, the attack on the US that you keep mentioning will happen again were it not for us invading Iraq…which again…WAS NOT THE STATED REASON FOR THE WAR THERE).

So what are the reasons the White house gives for an attack on Iraq? It basically comes down to one need, to protect ourselves (American citizens) from any and all threats, so that something like September 11th doesn't repeat itself-- Iraq especially. "'While there are many dangers in the world, the threat from Iraq stands alone-- because is gathers the most serious dangers of our age in one place," Bush declared in [a] prime-time speech from Cincinnati ... 'Iraq's weapons of mass destruction are controlled by a murderous tyrant who has already used chemical weapons to kill thousands of people' (Walsh)." This was four days before Congress approved the resolutions for Bush to go to war.

This shows that there seems to be an overwhelming agreement in the push for war. And polls have shown this to be true. According to a recent poll released by the New York Times/CBS News, 67 percent of Americans approve of taking action in Iraq (Walsh). Luckily this number goes down to 54 percent "if such a conflict would result in 'substantial American military casualties' (Walsh)." The stage seems to be set on an invasion, or as Bush calls it "regime change," of Iraq.
 
My, my...you aren't going to live a very long life with that kind of anger pent up. Perhaps your hatred of all non-whitebread folks is not such a good thing.

The typical race card jab eh? its old and worn out jessie!

As far as your rhetoricals go...they were just that...spun rhetoricals with no merit. I didn't realize I was supposed to respond to elementary school tactics. Your questions aren't even based on truth so what is the point?

And your Intellectually vacuous rheteoric is nothing but a waste of bandwidth, all you have as a defense or solution is 'cut n run', capitulate, appeasement. because like all liberals your nothing more than a coward who would sale your birthright to please the enemy.

You are close minded and get way too frustrated and angry at anyone that doesn't think exactly like you.

You just described Liberals in a nut shell, except you left out the part about being a coward. Thanks for the affirmation just the same! 😛

Hell yes I accept at face value the articles that I post that are FACT. What I posted was based on real history and was not just an amateur website designed to spew hate that only has untraceable claims of who is behind it. My article was based on fact and easily verifiable. Your website was not. Sure...it may be true...but it also may not be. No real way to know. The fact that you can so eagerly throw discretion to the wind and subscribe to something unverifiable says alot. I like things that you can verify with fact. I don't blindly jump on whatever train just b/c it is painted in the tint that I prefer.

I'll have to defer to UAL_TECH's post on that statement I certainly could'nt expound much except to say,.. you can't handle the truth

Other "questions"? "spreading islam by the sword" is actually a quote from a medival islamic king that forced that issue...not any Islamic prophet....Blaaa Blaaa Blaaa..

The remaining waste of your left wing liberal regurgitated spin is not even worthy of a response, Go stick your head back in the sand and leave the war on terror to real Men and Women!
 
"My" plan for Iraq? First…apologize to the world for our mistakes, miscalculations, underestimations, and false assumptions. Apologize for “going it aloneâ€￾ and not seeking a worldwide solution to Iraq. Then tell the world to shut up b/c we have some issues to correct. A little humility will go along way.

Here is a prime example of why I'll never agree with a liberal. All we have to do is apologize and beg them to like us again. BULLSH!T!! You want to apologize to them with one breath and then tell them to shut up with the next? That's very humble of you. Now a word of encouragement from Katie and Matt...

And sure we have to stay in Iraq for now. But we have to have some rules. Right now our only rule is that we are there until a sufficient army is trained (say...weren't we supposed to start withdrawal when the new gov't was elected?!) We need better rules. First off...the puppet gov't is 1/3 made up of known terrorist sects. DEMAND that these groups are not given power. These are appointed posts...not elected ones. Demand that if we are to continue serving as security for the country that they align their gov't to be conducive to a decent ending.

So now you're going to give DEMANDS to these people who you say hate us because we're there yet you want to put DEMANDS on them. I'm sure they'll listen to those DEMANDS too. Pretty slippery slope...better be careful with that one. You might be accused of watching too much Fox News.

Once that is done, DEMAND from neighboring countries...even Iran and Syria...that they take a more active role in policing arms/personnel flows into Iraq. I guarantee you that Iran is not desiring another drawn out war with Iraq as the last one crippled their country for two decades.

Wow...more DEMANDS. How do you think that'll go over in Damascus and Tehran? I bet they'll listen to you just as much as they're listening to the West right now and you actually think you can trust them into taking a more active role in policing arms and personell flows into Iraq? :lol: :lol: :lol: Where do you think the radical Islamist are coming from now? They're coming from Syria and Iran and are being funded by both just like Hezzbollah.
 
A leftist thinker wants Satan to Repent

Could Satan (The Puppet Master) Repent?

Imagine opening your daily newspaper one day and finding the bold headline "SATAN REPENTS!"

Shocking? Impossible? Well, let's just see.

Snake Satan was not created evil. He began good. His name at his beginning was Lucifer, which means "light bringer," whereas Satan means "adversary." By all accounts, he was a loyal and obedient archangel for a very long time before he went wrong.

Satan allowed himself to become evil. There was no influence around to constantly tempt him in the way that he now tempts humans - he is an original. Not satisfied with all that God has given him, he tried to stage an actual coup, attempting not only to take over the universe with the millions of angels who he recruited to join in his rebellion, but to overthrow God! Such a conquest was and always will be absolutely impossible of course - glaring evidence of how twisted Satan's reasoning had become. He and his army lost the battle of the heavens and were cast down to the earth.

Since then Satan and his angels, now called demons, have been very busy - the evil and suffering in our world is all too plain. He particularly hates humans because he realizes that we are in line to inherit all that he threw away.

But what if one day he decided that he had enough? We know that he has gone from good to bad, could he now go back from bad to good? Could the That Old Serpent repent? What does The Bible say?

In Revelation we are told of a time when Satan will be put away, imprisoned, in a pit of darkness for 1,000 years - a time that even he would consider substantial. This will serve two purposes: (1) to make clear beyond all doubt that God is infinitely supreme to him, (2) to warn him, in no uncertain terms, of his dismal fate for all eternity.

He will then be let out. Not an escape, but a release! You can read of it in Revelation chapter 20.

If there was ever a time when Satan would, or could repent, that would seem to be it. It almost seems that God is giving him one last chance. But what is Satan going to do? The Bible states plainly that upon regaining his freedom he is going to go right back to his evil activities. His fate will then be sealed. Forever.

Satan is beyond repentance. He is now, and always will be evil. He will be locked away forever and ever, endlessly for all eternity, and he will have only himself to blame.

Satan has chosen to make himself the greatest loser of all time.
 
The remaining waste of your left wing liberal regurgitated spin is not even worthy of a response, Go stick your head back in the sand and leave the war on terror to real Men and Women!

Excellent reply to my answer to your question on how to handle Iraq and excellent avoidance of my pointing out that you lied about having put a "plan" out there yourself.

For all of you...your cowardice of the real issues and finding real ways to fix them is amazing. Your hatred towards other cultures simply b/c you don't understand them is scary. And your stereotyping entire groups based on the most radical within the groups is ignorant. The extremist muslims hate America b/c of extremist Americans. Thanks for being those extremist Americans.

I'll go the way of the other critical thinkers on this board and just leave you all to your locker room party of ignorance. You'll all scream that I'm "burying my head in the sand" (really...is that all that you can do is regurgitate? local 12...you even regurgitate my exact arguments. think for yourself) when in fact I am off to do more productive things. You all can spend your hours talking hatred and hypotheticals but it is the doers that get something done...not the philosophers. Enjoy your hatred. Build that bunker, too, b/c in this new era of globalization you will have to learn to deal with other cultures and since you aren't comfortable with what you don't know (i.e. ignorance), you won't fare well above ground and unprotected.
 
Excellent reply to my answer to your question on how to handle Iraq and excellent avoidance of my pointing out that you lied about having put a "plan" out there yourself.
Your answers are nothing but regurgitated liberal 'cut n run', we must have dialog, Iraq isnt the problem, Blaaaa, Blaaaa, Blaaaa...nothing new or plausable in any of your cowardly Ideas. I gave a plan, it just does'nt suit your Idea of Utopia which is only a pipe dream, and will never be achieved. The French tried it your way, it cost them dearly and like you they have'nt learned a damn thing.

The extremist muslims hate America b/c of extremist Americans. Thanks for being those extremist Americans.
Your not only a Fool, your a brainwashed lemming by those hyper liberals that have gone completely off the deep end!

Seek help for your mental Illness. :wacko:

I'll go the way of the other critical thinkers on this board and just leave you all to your locker room party of ignorance. You'll all scream that I'm "burying my head in the sand"
critical thinker?.. :lol: :lol: You only repeat what your leaders spew, you've given nothing new and of substance, only Iraq did'nt cause 9/11 Blaaaa, Blaaaa, Blaaaa.

I am off to do more productive things. You all can spend your hours talking hatred and hypotheticals but it is the doers that get something done...not the philosophers.

productive things Like what coddle the enemy like your heros jane fonda and dan rather? Yea the doers are the ones defending your cowardly A$$ while you set here day after day undermining the war on terror, calling American policies the reason for it, and defending the very ones who wish to Kill you.

Enjoy your hatred. Build that bunker, too, b/c in this new era of globalization you will have to learn to deal with other cultures and since you aren't comfortable with what you don't know (i.e. ignorance), you won't fare well above ground and unprotected.

My hatred is directed at those who wish to take this country and freedom from me, and yes you can count yourself among those if you stand in defense of the enemy. Your the one along with the other whimpering Liberal cowards who will be hiding in a bunker should the terrorist ever make their advance, I on the other hand will take as many with me as I can.

OBTW...you've threatened to 'take your ball and run home' before, guess we'll see huh? now run along and stick your head back in the sand!......Good Riddance.
 
That guy is hopeless like too many others....
That guy has become unhinged from reality!

His hero:

Chavez calls Bush 'the devil' at U.N.

"In this very spot it smells like sulfur still." :lol:

"700 You just don't like people of color and culture, your just a Racist and don't understand them"...Blaaa, Blaaa, Blaaa... :lol:

P.S. sorry CH. 12 could'nt resist stealing your thunder. 😛


Dhimwit of the Month Honors


dhim·mi (dm or zm) - A Qur'anic term that refers to a subjugated non-Muslim person living in a society dominated by Muslims. Second-class status is confirmed by the legal system and dhimmis do not share the rights of their Muslim rulers. (ex. of use: "Hey Jimmy, if you want to be a dhimmi, then you'd better learn how to shimmy.")

dhim·wit (dmwt ) - A non-Muslim member of a free society that abets the stated cause of Islamic domination with remarkable gullibility or guile. A dhimwit is always quick to extend sympathy to the very enemy that would take away their own freedom, if given the opportunity.


...And the winner is (drum roll)...Ch. 12
 
Dont' forget reparations for slavery...and while you're apologizing...don't forget to apologize for Bill Clinton's penis.

Ahh, I was wondering when someone was going to "raise" the "Clenis", the "handy tool" that the rat-wingers love to "insert" into their "limp" arguments. Is that "thing" really the "root" of all evil? :lol:
 
Excellent reply to my answer to your question on how to handle Iraq and excellent avoidance of my pointing out that you lied about having put a "plan" out there yourself.

For all of you...your cowardice of the real issues and finding real ways to fix them is amazing. Your hatred towards other cultures simply b/c you don't understand them is scary. And your stereotyping entire groups based on the most radical within the groups is ignorant. The extremist muslims hate America b/c of extremist Americans. Thanks for being those extremist Americans.

I'll go the way of the other critical thinkers on this board and just leave you all to your locker room party of ignorance. You'll all scream that I'm "burying my head in the sand" (really...is that all that you can do is regurgitate? local 12...you even regurgitate my exact arguments. think for yourself) when in fact I am off to do more productive things. You all can spend your hours talking hatred and hypotheticals but it is the doers that get something done...not the philosophers. Enjoy your hatred. Build that bunker, too, b/c in this new era of globalization you will have to learn to deal with other cultures and since you aren't comfortable with what you don't know (i.e. ignorance), you won't fare well above ground and unprotected.

Hey Ch. 12, I'm beginning to see the light. It's becoming clear to me that genocide is the only true expression of peace and love! I mean, really, didn't Jesus say to wipe out everyone who looks funny or who won't bow down and worship him, with that 'ol time cleansing nuclear-fusion fire?

Anyway, I may be confused about all this, but it doesn't mean I'm not right. And besides, this may be my only chance to have a Culture War that is something besides complaining about what's on the TeeVee, and I don't want to miss my chance...Onward Christian Soldiers indeed! 😉
 
Hey Ch. 12, I'm beginning to see the light. It's becoming clear to me that genocide is the only true expression of peace and love! I mean, really, didn't Jesus say to wipe out everyone who looks funny or who won't bow down and worship him, with that 'ol time cleansing nuclear-fusion fire?

Anyway, I may be confused about all this, but it doesn't mean I'm not right. And besides, this may be my only chance to have a Culture War that is something besides complaining about what's on the TeeVee, and I don't want to miss my chance...Onward Christian Soldiers indeed! 😉


So does this mean God who flooded the entire planet was a whacko?

Was/Is God an insane God? Do you know better than God?

Is the word of God simply allegory, someone’s fantasies, sort of like Mary Baker Eddy who was chronically sick growing up with many ailments including paralysis, hysteria, seizures and convulsions, who also was the Founder of Christian Science. Or maybe you subscribe to another of the many cults.
 
I mean, really, didn't Jesus say to wipe out everyone who looks funny or who won't bow down and worship him, with that 'ol time cleansing nuclear-fusion fire?

Hmmm... :huh: My KJV does'nt quote Jesus of saying any of those things, You don't mind listing Book, Chapter and verse where Christ gave those orders to his followers by any chance?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top