What's new

Kansas lawmaker introduces, and state house passes, a new law making it legal to discriminate agains

Status
Not open for further replies.
KCFlyer said:
If his scripture supported his view and your intent was to show that scripture might be flawed...then what value is scripture? 
You are playing games. 
 
 I never stated there was a flaw in the scripture, only his use of them to defend his position.
 
Keep playing stupid, you are good at it.
 
One day you might even beat Ms Tree at it.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
You are playing games. 
 
 I never stated there was a flaw in the scripture, only his use of them to defend his position.
 
Keep playing stupid, you are good at it.
 
One day you might even beat Ms Tree at it.
I see a pattern with you and your posting. When someone is winning the debate with factual information, you simply call them stupid.

Another fact is that when someone is losing a debate, they resort to "intellectually dishonest" tactics (something you seem to have mastered):

Here is what I have seen of you:

"Stereotyping:

debater “proves” his point about a particular person by citing a stereotype that supposedly applies to the group that opponent is a member of; dismissing criticism by academic researchers by citing Ivory Tower stereotypes is an example of this debate tactic. For example, Professor David Romer of Cal did a study that found coaches should go for a first down far more often and kick far less on fourth down; Some coaches laughed and rejected his findings because he is a “professor,” turning the report sideways when reading it, dismissing Romer as “Ivory Tower.” If Romer is wrong, it is because of an error or omission in his facts or logic; not because he is a college professor."

"Name calling:

debater tries to diminish the argument of his opponent by calling the opponent a name that is subjective and unattractive; for example, cult members and bad real estate gurus typically warn the targets of their frauds that “dream stealers” will try to tell them the cult or guru is giving them bad advice; name calling is only intellectually dishonest when the name in question is ill defined or is so subjective that it tells the listener more about the speaker than the person being spoken about"

http://www.johntreed.com/debate.html

Carry on.
 
delldude said:
 
Not with frequent butt sex partners as a male homosexual.....
 
Really?  I did not realize that heterosexual couples were exclusively monogamous.  And if a hetero guy likes giving a little butt sex to one woman...why would he not want other women to share some too?  Especially with the hetero trend of "hooking up"
 
KCFlyer said:
 
Really?  I did not realize that heterosexual couples were exclusively monogamous.  And if a hetero guy likes giving a little butt sex to one woman...why would he not want other women to share some too?  Especially with the hetero trend of "hooking up"
 
Is 'hooking up' and not being monogamous in the Scriptures?
 
Why the obsession with who does what with whom?  This is a simple equal rights issue.  Is everyone treated the same under the law or do we get to pick and choose?  Eighteen states have said no and several others are getting ready to say no. 
 
If we can say no to one group, who is to say the states eventually does not say no to another group?  Who gets to pick and choose?
 
delldude said:
Allah will fix it ......
Allah sure will fix it, with stonings, beheadings, acid thown in the face, and other "honorable means". Now the Muslims are trying to impose their will in Europe (see the UK or Paris, they already fell) and now here in the USA with the Sharia Law recognition by liberals in government. Maybe Tree, Astra, or One Liner Wonder Dog should go protest ASAP?
 
Remember Iran or Saudi Arabia have no gays or lesbos, just ask Mammoud or the King.
 
May peace be upon you....
 
Why shouldn't gays be discriminated against?
 
What is it gays do to conservatives and Christians and anyone else if they don't buy into the plan?
 
See what was done to the Mozilla CEO for a political contribution six years ago?
 
Dog Wonder said:
Mooslims, Comunissss! and the Just Ain't Right in lockstep on this one.
 
Feeling Left Out just uses them for votes....along with Blacks.
 
Dog Wonder said:
Mooslims, Comunissss! and the Just Ain't Right in lockstep on this one.
You better get some whitty but empty one liners ready and get to the UK ASAP Doggie. Don't forget to mention the "War Against Women" to the Mooslims while your over there. Make sure you speak clearly one word at a time and sniff some Mooslim tail, they will love you for it.
 
  http://rt.com/news/sharia-law-uk-legal-713/
 
What does any of that have to do with laws that dictate who can marry who?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top