What's new

Kansas lawmaker introduces, and state house passes, a new law making it legal to discriminate agains

Status
Not open for further replies.
xUT said:
You seem to have an affinity with butt sex.
How did that work out 4 U?
😛
Dell is the one with that.  Apparently, only butt sex between two men is a killer.  But sex between an man and a woman is not.  And the children of many good "head burying" conservative parents who have taken "purity pledges" don't  view butt sex as real sex....so it's becoming more popular among them.
 
KCFlyer said:
Dell is the one with that.  Apparently, only butt sex between two men is a killer.  But sex between an man and a woman is not.  And the children of many good "head burying" conservative parents who have taken "purity pledges" don't  view butt sex as real sex....so it's becoming more popular among them.
 
Why, you wanna hook up for some ribs and tail?
 
Butt...butt...butt
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
Listen stupid
 
MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections
 
THAT IS A FACT. The data was collected from recorded diagnoses through clinical testing.
 
 
Spin it how you like. The arrest happened. They are a matter of public record. THAT IS A FACT.
Oh the irony.
 
Ms Tree said:
First there is no factual evidence to support the idea that homosexuality is a decision. 
 
[SIZE=10.5pt]Homosexuality was classified as a disease before its removal from [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]DSM-III. This was not due to any scientific evidence. It was removed with a vote because of political pressure from libtards. It was step one in their agenda to normalize gay relationships.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]I have heard the lie that people are born gay because of genetics. Explain why you can have identical twins with one being gay and one being straight.[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10pt]As far as people trying to compare interracial marriage to gay marriage, race is irrelevant to the definition of marriage, gender is not. [/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10pt]Sexual orientation is another lie. It is libtard "coined phrase" designed to normalize the behavior in the minds of the public.[/SIZE]
 
 
Ms Tree said:
Secondly, you pay for the bad decisions of people every day.  Alcoholism, smoking, obesity to name three and those three kill far more people than HIV does.   And those actually are decisions. 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disease_theory_of_alcoholism
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]Some critics of the disease model argue alcoholism is a choice, not a disease, and stripping alcohol abusers of their choice, by applying the disease concept, is a threat to the health of the individual; the disease concept gives the substance abuser an excuse. A disease cannot be cured by force of will; therefore, adding the medical label transfers the responsibility from the abuser to caregivers. Inevitably the abusers become unwilling victims, and just as inevitably they take on that role. They argue that the disease theory of alcoholism exists only to benefit the professionals' and governmental agencies responsible for providing recovery services, and the disease model has not offered a solution for those attempting to stop abusive alcohol and drug use.[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10.5pt]We pay for these "bad decisions" because the government and healthcare benefit from it. Labeling it as a disease is another propagated lie.  [/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10.5pt]HIV is mostly caused by unprotected sex and sharing of needles today. So yes new HIV cases are most commonly a consequence of making poor choices.  Like engaging in an MSM relationships…… for instance.[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10.5pt]Most of the "bad decisions" I pay for were the result of libtard stupidity. Supporting lifelong members of the welfare crowd and paying for Government benefits for illegals are a couple of good examples. I am not talking about the working poor that need government assistance, I am talking about able bodied parasites that refuse to even try and be self-sustaining.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
 
Ms Tree said:
I have yet to see the right advocate for laws or constitutional amendments against these actions.
 
No, you just see Mayor Bloomberg’s  ban on soda and the libtards trying to tax smokers into oblivion while spewing equality and individual rights propaganda from their never closing, lying mouths.
 
And why was it it put in there in the first place?  What medical studies or evidence didi they have to put it in?
 
Identical twins are not identical.  Try researching it.  There are always genetic variances.
 
The comparison of race is brought up due to rights.  Marriage as far as the state is concerned is a contractual issue.  The 14th amendment clearly states that all laws must treat all people equally.  No one is talking about religious marriage. Religious institutions can continue to do as they choose.
 
You can believe what ever you wish.  If you want to be taken seriously you have to present support for your beliefs.  So far you have not presented squat.
 
 
yea yea... its a gay disease.  blah blah blah.
 
 
And you dodge the question.  The right wingers are not passing the laws because they dont care about that stuff.  They only hate the gays so that is what they go after.  They over played their hand and they lost.  Took a while but they lost. 
 
Knotbuyinit said:
Can you provide any scientific proof that homosexuality is genetic?
Nope, I cannot. There are quite a few things that cannot be proven but that does not mean we go around assuming they are true. Typically in a court setting you have to prove someone has something (mental illness) before you convict them of it. It is not the persons burden to prove them selves innocent.

Would you be cool with someone saying Christianity is a mental illness and requiring you to prove it is not? I know I would not be OK with that.
 
Ms Tree said:
Nope, I cannot. There are quite a few things that cannot be proven but that does not mean we go around assuming they are true. Typically in a court setting you have to prove someone has something (mental illness) before you convict them of it. It is not the persons burden to prove them selves innocent.

Would you be cool with someone saying Christianity is a mental illness and requiring you to prove it is not? I know I would not be OK with that.
I was just curious as that belief appears to be the cornerstone of your argument. Homosexuality as a mental illness has been off the books for decades and I can't recall one instance in the recent past where homosexuals have been tried in a court of law.   
 
Knotbuyinit said:
I was just curious as that belief appears to be the cornerstone of your argument. Homosexuality as a mental illness has been off the books for decades and I can't recall one instance in the recent past where homosexuals have been tried in a court of law.
I used the courts as an example but you knew that. Don't you think if you are going to deprive a segment of society equal rights you should have proof of something? The cornerstone of your argument seems to be that homosexuality is a choice. Not a shred of evidence has been offered to support that notion.

You might want to do a Web search on sodomy laws and prosecution.
 
Ms Tree said:
 
 

Don't you think if you are going to deprive a segment of society equal rights you should have proof of something? The cornerstone of your argument seems to be that homosexuality is a choice.
 
Per your own admission, there is no scientific proof that homosexuality is a genetic tract passed on by heterosexual couples to their offspring or that someone is born "gay", therefore engaging in homosexual activities can only be a choice. I have science on my side, you don't!  
 
You might want to do a Web search on sodomy laws and prosecution.
 
Heterosexuals have been prosecuted under sodomy laws . . . what's your point?  
 
Knotbuyinit said:
Can you provide any scientific proof that homosexuality is genetic?
Who would choose to be something that gets them beaten, discriminated against, hated, condemned to hell for?  
 
KCFlyer said:
Who would choose to be something that gets them beaten, discriminated against, hated, condemned to hell for?  
 
Why you bring up the GOP for KC?
 
KCFlyer said:
Who would choose to be something that gets them beaten, discriminated against, hated, condemned to hell for?  
Why do gays go bug chasing (look it up if you do not know what it is)?  
 
Why do gays insist on trying to desensitize the public to the sickness of homosexuality?
 
Why do gays constantly bring up "rights" to the public but never talk about the "act"? 
 
Why do guys claim they want privacy and protection then go out of their way to draw attention to themselves?
 
Why do gays insist on the government and society to affirm their lives?
 
Why do gays insist that it is OK for them to be "born" sexual [SIZE=10.5pt]deviants[/SIZE] but distance themselves from pedophiles? I mean they were both born that way..... right? (another lie)
 
One day the pedophiles are going to take their play right out of the same playbook and some stupid ass like you, Ms Tree, and Dog Wonder will be supporting them, because your fools.
 
1) desensitization, 2) jamming, and 3) conversion. This is what gays are truly about.    
 
Knotbuyinit said:
 
 

 
Per your own admission, there is no scientific proof that homosexuality is a genetic tract passed on by heterosexual couples to their offspring or that someone is born "gay", therefore engaging in homosexual activities can only be a choice. I have science on my side, you don't!  
 

 
Heterosexuals have been prosecuted under sodomy laws . . . what's your point?  
Wait?  Really?  Lack of proof if proof of the opposite?  Since when?  There was no proof that the earth revolved around the sun so the assumption was that that the earth was the center of the universe.  We see how well that worked out.  Just because we have not mapped out the entire genetic genome to establish how every trait is passed on does not mean that the answer is not there. You don't have squat on your side.  
 
 
Knotbuyinit said:
I was just curious as that belief appears to be the cornerstone of your argument. Homosexuality as a mental illness has been off the books for decades and I can't recall one instance in the recent past where homosexuals have been tried in a court of law.   
 
you said that you could not recall any homosexuals being prosecuted recently in court in but we just agreed that they have sooooooo ...... what's your point?  Not sure what your definition of recent is but sodomy laws have been prosecuted as recently as 1998.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top