Kansas lawmaker introduces, and state house passes, a new law making it legal to discriminate agains

[Glenn Quagmire]

Yes, because from a libtard point of view racism and not accepting perversion are CLEARLY the same thing right?
 
I suppose people that do not support pedophiles are racist to right?
 
Your analogy is flawed

Your analogy is flawed.

Pedophilia is against the law. Being gay is not.

 

[Black Magic]

Your analogy is flawed.
Pedophilia is against the law. Being gay is not.

For now....give it time and watch it become acceptable\legal. Sounds silly or wrong you think? So did gay marriage...good will become bad and bad will become good.

 

[KCFlyer]

Yes, because from a libtard point of view racism and not accepting perversion are CLEARLY the same thing right?
 
I suppose people that do not support pedophiles are racist to right?
 
Your analogy is flawed at best.
 
 
 
Yet another example of this flawed analogy.
 
Sounds like libtard logic to me.

 
Yes... we will gladly refuse to serve a guy who porks another guy up the ass, but we will welcome a straight couple who fancies anal sex in the privacy of their bedroom (just like the gay guys).      I'm sorry, but all of this stuff about perversion and that....I have yet to see any gay guys fucking in front of a schoolhouse to subvert the kids.  They are just like most straight couples when it comes to that.  
 
Funny thing though, several years ago I had to decommission a computer system in San Francisco.  The guy I was working with was nice looking, well dressed in very conservative attire, spoke without a lisp, didn't make exaggerated gestures or movements of his body, and spoke with the air of a professional.   I had no idea he was gay, but he was.  And he didn't leer at me lustfully over lunch  and try to bring me over to the dark side.    Is he going to hell?  Personally, I don't think so.  But this baker doesn't want his door sullied by someone who is willing to pay for the service the baker provides. 
 
One thought....you all really find gays to be an abomination.  What does the baker do about lesbian couples?  I mean, it's so hard to tell - straight women almost always plan for their weddings with their girlfriends in tow - how does he know that the two women picking out a cake in his shop are just two friends planning a wedding and not the wedding couple themselves?   Without a sex check, he may unwillingly be subverting his store by selling a cake to a couple of heathens (although he kinda likes watching girl on girl sex on the internet).

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Guess you never heard of the straight baker who refused to bake a cake for a gay couple did you?

[SIZE=10.5pt]I am waiting for the gays to try this same tactic with the churches. They will claim discrimination because sooner or later a church will refuse to marry a gay couple due to religious principles. Of course the libtard media will put it all over the news condemning the church and fools like Ms Tree will be on here defending gay rights while supporting the left trampling all over religious freedoms.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]When it appears on the news it will not be any religion but Christianity. The left loves to attack the Christian faith while they scream from the top of their lungs how they support equality and freedom (including that of religion).[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]It will happen. Watch and see.[/SIZE]

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

For now....give it time and watch it become acceptable\legal. Sounds silly or wrong you think? So did gay marriage...good will become bad and bad will become good.

I think you are wrong. But hey, some people/countries use children as near slaves to make stuff for us Americans to buy and we do little to stop it.

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

I am waiting for the gays to try this same tactic with the churches. They will claim discrimination because sooner or later a church will refuse to marry a gay couple due to religious principles. Of course the libtard media will put it all over the news condemning the church and fools like Ms Tree will be on here defending gay rights while supporting the left trampling all over religious freedoms.[/size]
 [/size]
When it appears on the news it will not be any religion but Christianity. The left loves to attack the Christian faith while they scream from the top of their lungs how they support equality and freedom (including that of religion).[/size]
 [/size]
It will happen. Watch and see.[/size]

An interesting article on this subject here:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2012/12/gay_marriage_churches_synagogues_and_mosques_won_t_be_forced_to_conduct.html

"When states have laws that prohibit anti-gay discrimination in spaces open to the public, they generally exempt “actual places of worship, the organizations they operate, and certain private organizations,” according to this 2012 law review article. So it’s true that in 2007, New Jersey denied a tax exemption to a boardwalk pavilion in Ocean Grove owned by a Methodist group after two lesbian couples were rejected when they asked to hold civil union ceremonies there. But this was a beachfront property, not a church—and 99 percent of the group’s land, taken as a whole, retained its tax exemption."

 

[Black Magic]

I am waiting for the gays to try this same tactic with the churches. They will claim discrimination because sooner or later a church will refuse to marry a gay couple due to religious principles. Of course the libtard media will put it all over the news condemning the church and fools like Ms Tree will be on here defending gay rights while supporting the left trampling all over religious freedoms.[/size]
 [/size]
When it appears on the news it will not be any religion but Christianity. The left loves to attack the Christian faith while they scream from the top of their lungs how they support equality and freedom (including that of religion).[/size]
 [/size]
It will happen. Watch and see.[/size]

Exactly...that is the next barrier the sodemites want to break thru. They will also want homosexual sex ed taught in schools. Its all about having society accept it as the norm.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

 
Yes... we will gladly refuse to serve a guy who porks another guy up the ass, but we will welcome a straight couple who fancies anal sex in the privacy of their bedroom (just like the gay guys).      I'm sorry, but all of this stuff about perversion and that....I have yet to see any gay guys #### in front of a schoolhouse to subvert the kids.  They are just like most straight couples when it comes to that.  
 
Funny thing though, several years ago I had to decommission a computer system in San Francisco.  The guy I was working with was nice looking, well dressed in very conservative attire, spoke without a lisp, didn't make exaggerated gestures or movements of his body, and spoke with the air of a professional.   I had no idea he was gay, but he was.  And he didn't leer at me lustfully over lunch  and try to bring me over to the dark side.    Is he going to hell?  Personally, I don't think so.  But this baker doesn't want his door sullied by someone who is willing to pay for the service the baker provides. 
 
One thought....you all really find gays to be an abomination.  What does the baker do about lesbian couples?  I mean, it's so hard to tell - straight women almost always plan for their weddings with their girlfriends in tow - how does he know that the two women picking out a cake in his shop are just two friends planning a wedding and not the wedding couple themselves?   Without a sex check, he may unwillingly be subverting his store by selling a cake to a couple of heathens (although he kinda likes watching girl on girl sex on the internet).

[SIZE=10.5pt]I guess the articles I posted of cops having stings to bust homosexuals having sex in public parks and rest stops was just harmless fun right?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]You try to sell the illusion of a stable gay household. What I see is headlines such as the one listed above. I remember when AIDS was first discovered. It swept through the gay community like wildfire. That suggests a lot of casual sex. Kind of derails your whole loving, stable relationship theory.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_and_men_who_have_sex_with_men[/SIZE][SIZE=10.5pt][/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]Since reports of the [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]human immunodeficiency virus[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] (HIV) virus began to emerge in the [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]United States[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] in the 1980s, the HIV epidemic has frequently been linked to [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]gay[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt], [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]bisexual[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt], and other [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]Men who have sex with men[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] (MSM) by epidemiologists and medical professionals. The first official report on the virus was published by the [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]Center for Disease Control[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] (CDC) on June 5, 1981 and detailed the cases of five young gay men who were hospitalised with serious infections.[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][1][/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] A month later, The New York Times reported that 41 "homosexuals" had been diagnosed with [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]Kaposi’s Sarcoma[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt], and eight had died less than 24 months after the diagnosis was made.[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][2][/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] By 1982, the condition was referred to in the medical community as GRID ([/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]Gay-related immune deficiency[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]), "gay cancer," and "gay compromise syndrome." [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][3][/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] It was not until July 1982 that AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) was suggested to replace GRID [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][4][/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] and it was not until September that the CDC first used the AIDS acronym in an official report.[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][5][/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]It is now well-understood that HIV does not only affect the [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]gay community[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] but can also infect anybody, regardless of sex, ethnicity, or [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]sexual orientation[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt].[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][6][/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] However, the HIV virus still severely affects MSM across the globe. MSM are only a small percentage of the U.S. population, but they are consistently the population group most affected by the HIV/AIDS virus and are the largest proportion of American citizens with an AIDS diagnosis who have died.[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][7][/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] The United Nations estimates that 2 to 20% of MSM are infected with HIV, depending on the region they live in[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt][/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]You met someone gay in libtard California. In San Francisco of all places? Wow. Real shocker.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]If gays acted like your friend they would not piss people off so much. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]But what most people see is the flamboyant bizarre behavior. I was raised that you keep your bedroom life in the bedroom. All I see in the news anymore is some athlete or actress announcing their gay for the entire world to hear. If being gay is so normal then why do celebrities feel a need to announce it?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt][/SIZE]

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Exactly...that is the next barrier the sodemites want to break thru. They will also want homosexual sex ed taught in schools. Its all about having society accept it as the norm.

I am glad we are on the same page. 

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

https://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/hrc-issue-brief-hiv-aids-and-the-lgbt-community
 
Even this website, targeted toward the gay community, states that gay and bisexual men account for 63 percent of new HIV infections annually.
 
63%
 
63%
 
What is the percentage of the population that the gay community represents?
 
Now try to sell that whole illusion of a stable loving, relationship again.

 

[KCFlyer]

 
[SIZE=10.5pt]I guess the articles I posted of cops having stings to bust homosexuals having sex in public parks and rest stops was just harmless fun right?[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]You try to sell the illusion of a stable gay household. What I see is headlines such as the one listed above. [/SIZE]
 

That's because stable households rarely, if ever, make the news.  Using "what you have seen" I can make the following assumtions:
 
1.  If my son is an altar boy, he is being molested by every priest in every parish.  I mean...everything I've read points to that "fact".
 
2. If my teenage son has female teachers, they are seducing him and having sex in the parking lot.  Same thing - so many female teachers are seducing teenage high school boys..Mary K  Latourneau represents all female teachers, right?  AFter all...all the articles I see point to that "fact".  
 
Now...can you answer my question about how my bible thumping baker can identify a lesbian couple looking for a cake?  Does he ask all his customers who and how they engage in sexual activities in the bedroom?  I've seen some straight guys who have a rather effeminate effect, but they are married, or planning to be married to w woman....would the baker be within his rights to refuse service because this heterosexual man spoke with a lisp?  Will he require him to go down on his fiancee to "prove his manhood" right there in the bakery?  

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

That's because stable households rarely, if ever, make the news.  Using "what you have seen" I can make the following assumtions:
 
1.  If my son is an altar boy, he is being molested by every priest in every parish.  I mean...everything I've read points to that "fact".
 
2. If my teenage son has female teachers, they are seducing him and having sex in the parking lot.  Same thing - so many female teachers are seducing teenage high school boys..Mary K  Latourneau represents all female teachers, right?  AFter all...all the articles I see point to that "fact".  
 
Now...can you answer my question about how my bible thumping baker can identify a lesbian couple looking for a cake?  Does he ask all his customers who and how they engage in sexual activities in the bedroom?  I've seen some straight guys who have a rather effeminate effect, but they are married, or planning to be married to w woman....would the baker be within his rights to refuse service because this heterosexual man spoke with a lisp?  Will he require him to go down on his fiancee to "prove his manhood" right there in the bakery?  

 
1 and 2 are stupid arguments. Priests and teachers behaving in that manner without proof is conjecture. 63 percent of all new documented HIV infections per year attributed to a small homosexual population is a fact. I know you libtards have a hard time telling fact from fiction but do try.
 
To answer your stupid question if the lesbian couple is behaving in a provocative way I would take that as a clue. Every gay I have knowingly met loves to draw attention to themselves with their homosexual behavior.  You can also listen to a couple converse and get a clue.  
 
Apparently you think this baker lives in some bizarro world where society does not have established conversational and behavioral standards that communicate intent.

 

[Force Majeure]

Every gay I have knowingly met loves to draw attention to themselves with their homosexual behavior.

So you like the openly gay types. Good for you.

I guess if you are into that kind of thing, you will find it when you look for it.

Please keep it to yourself.

 

[Ms Tree]

Your analogy is flawed.

Pedophilia is against the law. Being gay is not.

More importantly is why it's against the law.  A child cannot legally give consent.  Two (or more) adults can.
 
You know when they start talking about animals and children that their argument is lost.

 

[Ms Tree]

A few years ago, reading posts by Black and La La would have pissed me off.  The level of ignorance and hatred is truly frightening.
 
Since huge strides in equal rights have been made in the last year or two (18 states recognize marriage equality) people like them are no longer in the majority and will eventually go the way of the dinosaur.  They have lost and they have lost big.
 
Now I look at them and laugh.  I guess Dog is right.