Ms Tree said:
To believe that would be to believe that in the south, a region that supported slavery and fought a war to keep slavery in place, all the people were democrats at the time (we support slavery after all right) and that sometime after the 1950/60' all these dems moved out of the south (and went where???) and were replaced by republicans who now do not believe in racism (have you looked at the racial/gender make up of the Congress lately?)? When did this mass movement of people happen in the South?
This line of BS has been debunked so many times it is not even worthy of a discussion but since you seem to be new here I guess we have to go over it one more time.
So please explain where this Dem majority in the south went and where did all these republicans come from?
Wiki:
The South becomes Republican: 1964-2000
For nearly a century after
Reconstruction, the white South strongly identified with the Democratic Party. The region was called the
Solid South. Republicans controlled parts of the mountains districts and they competed for statewide office in the
border states. Before 1948, southern Democrats believed that their party, with its respect for
states' rights and appreciation of traditional southern values, was the defender of the southern way of life. Southern Democrats warned against aggressive designs on the part of Northern liberals and Republicans and civil rights activists whom they denounced as "outside agitators."
The adoption of the first civil rights plank by the 1948 convention and President
Harry S. Truman's Executive Order 9981, which provided for equal treatment and opportunity for African-American servicemen, opened a wedge between the northern and southern wings of the party.
[12] By 1952, however, the brief Dixiecrat revolt was over, and the segregationist senator was named the vice presidential candidate. By the late 1950s the national Democratic Party again began to embrace the
civil rights movement, and the old argument that Southern whites had to vote Democratic to protect segregation grew weaker.
Modernization had brought factories, national businesses, and larger, more cosmopolitan cities such as Atlanta, Dallas, Charlotte, and Houston to the South, as well as millions of migrants from the North and more opportunities for higher education. They did not bring a heritage of racial segregation, and instead gave priority to modernization and economic growth.
[13]
Integration and the
civil rights movement caused enormous controversy in the white South, with many attacking it as a violation of
states' rights. School segregation was outlawed by the Supreme Court in 1954, but compliance was very slow in much of the region. The Civil Rights act of 1964 and The Voting Rights Act of 1965 were passed by bipartisan majorities of northern congressmen.
Only a small die-hard element resisted, led by Democratic governors Lester Maddox of Georgia, and especially George Wallace of Alabama. These populist governors appealed to a less-educated, blue-collar electorate that on economic grounds favored the Democratic Party, but opposed desegregation.
The passage of civil rights legislation meant that the Democratic Party could no longer pose as the champion of protection for southern segregation. That freed conservative white Southerners from the possibility of voting for Republican presidential candidates from 1964-80. They continued to vote heavily for Democrats in state and local offices.
[14][15] Meanwhile, newly enfranchised black voters began supporting Democratic candidates at the 80-90-percent levels, producing Democratic leaders such as
Julian Bond and
John Lewis of Georgia, and
Barbara Jordan of Texas. Just as
Martin Luther King had promised, integration had brought about a new day in Southern politics.
[16]
By the 1990s Republicans were starting to win elections at the statewide and local level throughout the South. By 2014, the region was heavily Republican at the local state and national level. A key element in the change was the transformation of
evangelical white Protestants in the south from a largely nonpolitical approach to a heavily Republican commitment. Pew pollsters reported that, "In the late 1980s, white evangelicals in the South were still mostly wedded to the Democratic Party while evangelicals outside the South were more aligned with the GOP. But over the course of the next decade or so, the GOP made gains among white Southerners generally and evangelicals in particular, virtually eliminating this regional disparity."
[17] Exit polls in the
2004 presidential election showed that Bush led Kerry by 70–30% among Southern whites, who comprised 71% of the voters. Kerry had a 90–9 lead among the 18% of Southern voters who were black. One-third of the Southern voters said they were white evangelicals; they voted for Bush by 80–20.
[18]