U
UAL_TECH
Guest
Sounds more like a Flat tax or Fair tax argument rather than a union argument. What we all need are lower taxes.
and more Buffaloes.
Yea Baby...

B) UT
Sounds more like a Flat tax or Fair tax argument rather than a union argument. What we all need are lower taxes.
Guess it does seem a little off topic. Let me add this:Sounds more like a Flat tax or Fair tax argument rather than a union argument. What we all need are lower taxes.
Guess it does seem a little off topic. Let me add this:
We should organize the illegals in this country so we Americans can make a livable wage. 😛h34r:
Is that better?![]()
Every time I see one of your posts, it almost always has something to do with Kool-Aid.... and I've decided to laugh at you instead of take you seriously. It's much easier that way.
I think I may start a new thread: "Let's talk union busting. You won't see union busting discussed here."
🙄 Still mad AMFA never stood a chance in the ATL hangar?
![]()
Every time I see one of your posts, it almost always has something to do with Kool-Aid.... and I've decided to laugh at you instead of take you seriously. It's much easier that way.
That's because illegal aliens are willing to do it cheaper and complain a lot less about it than you. They are the equivalent of outsourcing overseas, but they are here in our country. Why do you think there is such a large market for illegal aliens & overseas outsourcing? It's because we've gone and priced ourselves out of global markets, and now even our own market here at home is going with the lower priced labour. So you think raising the minimum wage is going to make us more competitive, decrease outsourcing and employment of illegal aliens? These people are not leaving, they're here to stay. You can complain about how it's not right, but it's not going to change anything. And yes, they will do your job for you, for less than half what you charge, and they won't even dream of organizing.
We may dislike it, but it's happening and it will continue happening so long as we remain uncompetitive in wages. I won't argue that unions have helped in some ways... but they are a huge part of the reason we find ourselves in this outsourcing/insourcing mess that we're in.
I think I may start a new thread: "Let's talk union busting. You won't see union busting discussed here."
Are you an Eastern Scab USAir757?
So, if you think we are uncompetitive in wages, then you are definitely a part of what’s wrong with America. You sir are a disgrace to all Americans. I don't want to live in a thirld world country nor make America one. Uncompetative wages my ###.
And if you don’t think the illegal’s wouldn’t organize you are wrong, they’d do it in a heart beat!
You are the reason we Americans are considered to be “stupid Americansâ€.
Sounds more like a Flat tax or Fair tax argument rather than a union argument. What we all need are lower taxes.
A quick question. How do you think seniority will be handled when Delta merges with a company who has union represented AMTs? Straight answer please. Do you see dove tailing or staple in your future? Do you think a union representing AMTs will allow non-union AMTs to go above them?
A quick question. How do you think seniority will be handled when Delta merges with a company who has union represented AMTs? Straight answer please. Do you see dove tailing or staple in your future? Do you think a union representing AMTs will allow non-union AMTs to go above them?
DAL Mech,
There are NOT a lot of hypothetical situations(mergers)where the outcome of combining union forces, w/DL non Union forces(AMT'S) would not be known(99%) in advance.
Examples;
DL and AA ?.....................NEVER HAPPEN (DL brings NOTHING to AA's table)
DL and UA ?.....................MORE Union AMT's at UA(BUT they Might give up their name though)
DL and NW?......................"DOA/RIP" !!(though DL would have stayed non-union) !
DL and CO ?.....................MORE DL Amt's(DL would continue non-union)
DL and US? ......................Still MORE DL Amt's (again non-union)
SO, you can see that THE only potential problem DL would have, is with a UAL hook up.
Simple, date of hire should be the deciding factor. Any other way would not be fair. I also think union represented AMTs will have no option, our management has stated that our seniority WILL be protected. I imagine there would have to be a vote as to whether keep the union or dump it. To assume a union would simply move in without a vote would be ludicrous.
Straight enough for you?
DAL Mech,
Thanks for the answer. Unfortunately I would not believe anything coming from management's mouth.
Just curious, but do you feel the same way about management at WN?
Are you an Eastern Scab USAir757?
(Nor'Easta @ Mar 23 2008, 08:49 AM) *
Kool-Aid is for people like yourself and the anti-union folks at Delta. Kool-Aid drinkers are people who are pro-management and anti-union. But since were an Eastern SCAB, you probably already know that.
I think you should start a new thread: "USAir757 the former Eastern SCAB, needs more Kool-Aid!" You're truly a pathetic person.