The article says
- Knighton, a former helicopter pilot with nearly 30 years of service, who turned out to be seated in the same back row as Brown, assumed that because he boarded last, he would be seated up front for comfort and ease of exit in case of emergency. Instead, she wrote in a complaint obtained by “She The People,” he was squeezed into a narrow aviation wheelchair that “bumped up against stationary aisle seats as he was wheeled through the aircraft. [He] was obviously humiliated by being paraded through the aircraft and was visibly upset. I touched Brown on his shoulders and asked if he was okay. Tears ran down his face, but he did not cry out loud.”
Plenty of evidence he boarded after the rest of the passengers.
If he was late because he was on a connecting flight, then the whole situation would have been different.... but the article didn't say that.
It said he was flying ATL-WAS.
I have no problem w/ calling a spade a spade but from the very beginning of this article, there are a number of red flags that indicated that the situation couldn't have been appropriately handled to meet his expectations which were out of line... including the fact that he was traveling sick and with a high fever.
DL does offer seat assignments in advance. Did he inform anyone when he made his reservation of his need for assistance?
The "narrow aviation wheelchair" is standard issue in the airline industry.
I have no qualms w/ doing all possible to help out but he flew on a public airline, not a private air ambulance. Arriving at the gate late - and perhaps he was on a connecting flight but this article which managed to find something wrong for everything else DL did doesn't mentioned in. Sick. And with the expectation that he should have been seated up front.
Mikey,
you always seem to come out of the woodwork over here only when you can find something wrong w/ DL and yet seem to get mighty defensive of anything said about your own AA.
You came on this thread already convinced DL was wrong... just like you have on other threads.
I'm not so gullible as to believe everything that is put on the internet.
My reputation vote is what it is because I have challenged the establishment on this board and shown year after year that the popular position isn't always - and often - the right one.
I can write out a laundry list of topics and names of people regarding topics I challenged people on only to end up w/ negative votes; they were wrong and I was right on topics that are black and white enough to be able to say that one side was right or not.
I'm not hear to protect anyone's valued position including DL's. If anyone is wrong, we'll call it what it is.
Shall I start the list w/ your name and the topics you challenged me on only be proven wrong?