Mark Foley. Cover up?

[PITbull]

Geez 700IAM....do you think that the more you cut and paste the more people are going to get your point. If you can't get your point across in a few sentences then a deluge of bible verses won't help. I believe your lengthy posts just strengthen people's resolve to disagree with you. It's a shame but I believe your approach is a little too heavy-handed.

I recommend no debate... I think his posting biblical versus is his own therapy for his own issues. As he posted above, he's not interested in what anyone thinks, and when the entire KJV is posted on here...he'll just start over again. Its called OC.

Post away.....

 

[700IAM]

I recommend no debate... I think his posting biblical versus is his own therapy for his own issues. As he posted above, he's not interested in what anyone thinks, and when the entire KJV is posted on here...he'll just start over again. Its called OC.

Post away.....

We all know who and what you are. You're obsession over the past which somehow connects me with your concocted fantasies needs attention ASAP least you go completely over the top. As per your posts, your almost there. PM’s gave me the truth, scary as that is.


William

 

[UAL_TECH]

We all know who and what you are. You're obsession over the past which somehow connects me with your concocted fantasies needs attention ASAP least you go completely over the top. As per your posts, your almost there. PM’s gave me the truth, scary as that is.
William

You are nuts!!!
Scary as it is.........

:blink: UT

 

[Garfield1966]

I would tell you if I knew but I didn’t know what I should say. Not that I didn’t know what I knew but I really didn’t know what I should have known. If I knew what I known, then I would have reacted differently given the facts that I had the knowledge but didn’t know.

UT

Huh?

 

[UAL_TECH]

Huh?

Vote 4 me!!!

😛 UT

 

[Seatacus]

Thanks for the laugh
The Holy Spirit does his work and my actions will not throw a money wrench into what will be.

Be careful....your self-righteousness is showing.

 

[Garfield1966]

Some more good news (for my side of the aisle).

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/20...0-09-poll_x.htm

 

[local 12 proud]

Some more good news (for my side of the aisle).

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/20...0-09-poll_x.htm

You missed this little Gem. 😀

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=22868

 

[Garfield1966]

You missed this little Gem. 😀

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=22868

I wonder if it's true. Assuming it is, who ever photo shopped that picture needs allot more practice. I just edited a few pictures and I can do a better job than that.

Like someone commented on that blog, seems like it would have been much easier to use a picture of a real soldier rather than photo shop a Canadian. I wonder if it had something to do with consent from a US soldier, which is not needed for a non-US soldier.

Either way, if it's true it stupid as hell. Does not come close to starting a war based on false premises with out any time line for an exit. Also does not come close to know about inappropriate contacts between a House rep (is on a commission involving sexual predators) and minors. Does not even merit a blip on the radar of public opinion.

 

[MrAeroMan]

I'd love to see the questions. One thing is clear anyone can order a poll and it can be worded to get the results that group is trying to promote. Now...the USA Today doesn't have an agenda so it's gotta....oh wait.....never mind.

 

[sentrido]

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

Better, more polls and more local. Enjoy.

 

[Garfield1966]

I'd love to see the questions. One thing is clear anyone can order a poll and it can be worded to get the results that group is trying to promote. Now...the USA Today doesn't have an agenda so it's gotta....oh wait.....never mind.

Yea, you're right. This is just an isolated poll. The republicans have nothing to worry about in the mid-term elections. Everything is running smoothly. The economy is great. No international conflicts. No scandals taking place. Yep, everything is cool. Republicans are running 90%+ approval ratings and everyone is thrilled with their performance. They are just spending their butts off on advertisements to do their part in helping out the economy.

 

[delldude]

Yea, you're right. This is just an isolated poll. The republicans have nothing to worry about in the mid-term elections. Everything is running smoothly. The economy is great. No international conflicts. No scandals taking place. Yep, everything is cool. Republicans are running 90%+ approval ratings and everyone is thrilled with their performance. They are just spending their butts off on advertisements to do their part in helping out the economy.

How'd the Republicans get in in the first place?

Because voters are tired of the democratic shennanigans.
They haven't changed their MO...still op from the same tired old playbook....they may prop up kerry again,hes an idiot...or big al......who they got worth a damn?
Ahh john dean ,yeah he's cool....

 

[Garfield1966]

How'd the Republicans get in in the first place?

Because voters are tired of the democratic shennanigans.
They haven't changed their MO...still op from the same tired old playbook....they may prop up kerry again,hes an idiot...or big al......who they got worth a damn?
Ahh john dean ,yeah he's cool....

In 2000, the Republicans got in because you sold your candidate better than we did. In 2004, you got in because you used fear and played the morality card (that bird is coming home to roost). Now in 2006, in likely hood your party will become the minority because you pull the same crap that the democrats pull. You played the morality card and now your party was unwilling to get rid of a child predator. Pay back is a b!tch isn’t it?

We have Dean, Kerry and Gore, you have Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, Rice …. What’s the difference?

Why is it that you keep reverting to what democrats did as opposed to what republicans are doing? I have admitted time and time again the shortcomings of the democrats, yet you seem to be implying that the republicans can do no wrong.

If they got rid of us for our shenanigans, it will be your turn in 2006 and in all likely hood, 2008 as well. Your party is not immune to screwing up and they will pay for their mistakes.

 

[delldude]

In 2000, the Republicans got in because you sold your candidate better than we did.

Here here....one heckuva lot of dem's voted Bush in because of party shennanigans on the left....and they're still leaning that way.

In 2004, you got in because you used fear and played the morality card (that bird is coming home to roost).

Yeah...we got that page from your playbook..you know,scare the elderly's S/S and prescriptions.

We have Dean, Kerry and Gore, you have Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, Rice …. What’s the difference?

No,Allen,Brownback,Cox,Frist,Guiliani,Hagel,McCain,Pataki,to name a few...new faces and names....no retreads like clinton,gore,kerry....

I have admitted time and time again the shortcomings of the democrats, yet you seem to be implying that the republicans can do no wrong.

Never said that...but don't think one gay senator will bring the house down.
So then what is it other than Iraq that upsets you about those nasty Republicans?
Patriot Act??
No child left behind??
Borders/Immigration??
Economy doing fine??