Actually, I'm on VC this week.What is really hilarious is watching "tough guy" union presidents picketing the company while on company paid time. That is awesome!
Actually, I'm on VC this week.What is really hilarious is watching "tough guy" union presidents picketing the company while on company paid time. That is awesome!
Bob,some of these STOOGES don't even need a reply .Actually, I'm on VC this week.
Well, assuming you can count at least 29 mechanics are in the video. We had around 50 in that session and around half that the next session. By the way both candidates were there.
Yes, the TWU is to blame for the lack of solidarity, just as management is to blame for the performance of the company. The TWU is responsible for the structure of the Union, they could change it, make it similar to what works such as what the SWA Flight Attendants and Local 100 have but instead we have a hodgepodge mix of locals with no consistent thought process behind the makeup of those locals. Weighted votes, a lack of structure, unelected officials who outrank elected ones, Nobody's in charge. It's a mess, and yes the International is responsible for that.
Actually, I'm on VC this week.
Ok help me out here? I am at a loss as to your meaning concerning the use of TWU negotiated benefits to bring the line locals together?Better yet, using your TWU negotiated benefits.
Thank you President Owens for your time and dedication to all Union Brother's and Sister's.Actually, I'm on VC this week.
So you would advocate for merging all or some of the line maintenance locals together? Okay. I'll go with that. When are you putting that plan together? I'll sign that petition, vote for that plan, pass out flyers you name it.
Better yet, using your TWU negotiated benefits.
Better yet, using your TWU negotiated benefits.
My guess is he plays Golf with the company.What do you on YOUR one week less vacation per year? Volunteer at the international?
Is not that the same as playing 18 holes with the Intl? :huh:My guess is he plays Golf with the company.
My guess is he plays Golf with the company.
Speaking of the "one week", the week taken from us had been earned already.Yep, one week of VC less than most, even most non union, thanks to "Yes men" like you.
Yep, one week of VC less than most, even most non union, thanks to "Yes men" like you.
Their lives were at stake where all you have to worry about is an international appointment. Got kneepads?Yes I enjoy working instead of being in the unemployment line like all those unemployed no voters at UA, US, NW, etc...
I would have much preferred to keep the week but I did not get the option of lifting the system protection date to allow RIFs in lieu of pay and benefit cuts. The agenda of the presidents at that time seemed to be more political and wanted to drive the bus off the BK cliff. Ended up making a bad deal with the concessionary deal.
And Chuck it's not the name that's important, it's the message. People like you have weak arguments that when countered you attack the person as "in bed with management", "playing golf with the company", "a yes voter", "kool aid drinker", etc... While it may sound funny and you feel like a tough guy it is nothing more than being thug which is why the union has little to no clout in places like court, the media, and a PEB. When people discuss ways to improve labor's image or worth you say, "Screw you. Pay me."
On a historical note, not comparing any of this blog stuff to anything, every read the Federalist Papers? Those guys were such candy a**es hiding behind pseudonyms.