ChockJockey
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,393
- Reaction score
- 1,350
He didn't put himself in the forefront, he was asked a question. If it's ultimately the fault of the DOT, why rip Parker? Give them some credit, they saw this one coming, tried to fight it like all the other airlines, saw it become a reality, and came up with plan and procedure to deal with it; isn't this the kind of stuff we're always accusing them of not doing or not doing right? The guy's trying to protect revenue, it's not like anyone wants these flights canceled but that's the situation we're stuck in. Maybe explaining what our airline policy is going to be to the press and public beforehand is pro-customer; great, good, cool.Doug put himself in the forefront and in doing so he continues his history of customer unfriendly attitudes despite the fact that this debacle is ultimately the fault of a misguded DOT attempt to regulate what amounts to the weather.
Mr. Parker and other executives of US Airways discussed their business last week at the annual media conference the airline holds for airline reporters and bloggers to ask the kind of questions that get dodged by airline public relations people.
Did you read the article you posted?
But Mr. Parker, along with Robert Isom, the airline’s chief operating officer, was pretty candid in addressing the situation, I thought.
Doug Parker is the CEO of such an airline that has publically stated they WILL engage in a behavior that impacts customers negatively.
One could make the argument that charging fares is a behavior that impacts the customers negatively. Should we stop charging fares? I hear about CEO's talking about revenue all the time. Does this also make them anti-customer?
And please don't hate on Excel, them data sheets got me through some tough times...