What's new

Msy And No

Taking away the heart strings and looking at reality. Should MSY and NO be rebuilt?

  • 1) Yes we dealing with people's lives and culture.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2) No billions of dollars for a city below sealevel, no brainer

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

DFWCC

Senior
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
430
Reaction score
0
Location
DFW
I have my opinion but I'd like to see if I'm all wet.
 
Seatacus said:
Didn't we rebuild San Francisco and Chicago when they were destroyed?
[post="296304"][/post]​

Don't know if "we" rebuilt Chicago. I think they did it themselves. As for San Fran, not clear how much "we" did vs. California did.
 
I don't agree with the aspect of rebuilding New Orleans as I think the city was bound to have a disaster, whether it happened now or later. They need to design the city so that it can adapt to the drastic changes in sea level.
 
Reinforce the levies and let the folks of NO decide if they want to move back. If it were me I'd take the insurance money and start a new life somewhere else. For those with no insurance, the government should provide assistance to rebuild, or move to another location. The government should only allow folks to move back in if there safety can be reasonably assured. Isn't most of Holland under sea level? Maybe we should solicit there suggestions.
 
EricLv2Fish said:
Reinforce the levies and let the folks of NO decide if they want to move back.
[post="296518"][/post]​

People would move back with the knowledge that if this occcured again...we would bail them out again. Moral Hazard.

EricLv2Fish said:
Isn't most of Holland under sea level? Maybe we should solicit there suggestions.
[post="296518"][/post]​

Ya. And its also not in the direct path of Hurricanes nor is it surround on three sides by water.
 
Not all of the city is below sea level, so that part above sea level should be restored. The area that is now below sea level is an area that sank over time, since it is likely to continue to sink rebuilding without raising it, which may be impractical, is inviting disaster.
 
The Drunken Duck said:
People would move back with the knowledge that if this occcured again...we would bail them out again. Moral Hazard.
Ya. And its also not in the direct path of Hurricanes nor is it surround on three sides by water.
[post="296521"][/post]​


Are you saying that the North Sea is a placid body of water?

Are you saying the dykes of Holland have never failed?
 
Bob Owens said:
Are you saying that the North Sea is a placid body of water?
[post="296805"][/post]​
No. But it isn't subject to Hurricanes. It's a very dangerous sea during a storm, if your in it.

Bob Owens said:
Are you saying the dykes of Holland have never failed?
[post="296805"][/post]​
No. The levees broke in the 1950's.

What's your point? If you have one.
 
How about rebuilding New Orleans on stilts and make it the Venice of North America. Could you imagine cruising in a gondola and listening to Dixieland. :huh:
 
Seatacus said:
How about rebuilding New Orleans on stilts and make it the Venice of North America. Could you imagine cruising in a gondola and listening to Dixieland. :huh:
[post="297561"][/post]​
Sure I could see them doing just that, after they purge out the poor of course.

They will condem all the homes that are in the way of such plans, whether damaged or not, then bragg about how it was rebuilt! The thing that they will leave out is how all those that lived there before are gone.

This would not be an uncommon event. The English used a potato crop failure to purge Ireland of "excess population". We used disease to kill the native American population. Its cheaper and less controversal than genocide but just as effective. Just like the English blamed the Irish for the famine (as net exports of food from Ireland surpassed imports despite the famine) we see some blaming the residents of New Orleans for their difficulties.
 
Bob Owens said:
Sure I could see them doing just that, after they purge out the poor of course.

They will condem all the homes that are in the way of such plans, whether damaged or not, then bragg about how it was rebuilt! The thing that they will leave out is how all those that lived there before are gone.

This would not be an uncommon event. The English used a potato crop failure to purge Ireland of "excess population". We used disease to kill the native American population. Its cheaper and less controversal than genocide but just as effective. Just like the English blamed the Irish for the famine (as net exports of food from Ireland surpassed imports despite the famine) we see some blaming the residents of New Orleans for their difficulties.
[post="299576"][/post]​
Man, Bob, you sure bring in the sunshine....
 
The Drunken Duck said:
Man, Bob, you sure bring in the sunshine....
[post="300068"][/post]​

If we're lucky, Long Island will be the next place devastated by a Cat 5 hurricane...
 
Back
Top