If you wish to add another name to your voluminous enemies list, please feel free
(I'm crying...you're sooo important. I am nothing now. 😛 ). Does this mean I have to return your earlier e-mails
(1 EMAIL... keep it as a compliment..I ment it. Mature people do those things.) you sent me when you expressed admiration for my postings
(1 post..no you don't but you are welcome to publish the ONE that I sent. Stop trying to sound important AGAIN...)? Personally I don't care either way.
(From the looks of your quasi (thats Latin/ Italian. I know words seem to be important to you) dissertation YOU DO) I colored this red FOR YOU!I hold no leadership position at NWA, either real or imagined
(you just want to come off that way) , despite multiple offers from NWA to accept real ones (you want a trophy?). I also do not come on this board and parrot the NWA Newswire
(that is NEWS to US) then pretend it is news, or attack anyone from another airline just for existing or continuing to exist. When I used the term 'we', I was
certainly in no way referring to you, just to that vast majority of NWA employees who decline to join you in your anti-UAL crusade.
I said what I meant and I meant what I said
(good for you...want a trophy), your constant harping on the UAL folks is annoying
(As is your vapid responses to Magsau from United). All the people I know at NWA
(all 10 of them...as I am SURE the VAST majority of NWA people just love all the BS that has been stated on these boards about them from multiple Ual employees))who read this board have commented on your strident, juvenile attacks and 'rah-rah' cheerleader BS
(My "rah rah is for the rank and file men and women who make up NWA...I am sure it is clear why you aren't feeling so rah rah these days). As far as I'm concerned, you can spout all the "NWA Rules!" propaganda you wish -I stopped reading it months ago
(obviously you didn't..snicker)-Â but I will not stand by and have others assume you speak for me.
(WHO gives a flying peacock) How you have managed to not get banned from USAviation forums for the way you talk to others astounds me
(Clearly, it doesn't take much to astound you. Perhaps they can interpet the difference between truth and fiction[do you know what that means?]). To me, your self-appointed anti-UAL
(Wrong 'o...Know it all man. Mine is anti- BANKRUPTCY abuse and drag the industry down with you crusade) crusade is no different from Trip Confirmed's
(very similar to your whiney rant) earlier anti-NWA crusade either in tactics or in tone.
There was no insult
in my statement, merely a expression of my opinion and the opinions on the subject that my
(yeah right...I am sure they have)coworkers have expressed to me, but judging by your extreme
(sorry you took it that way...I am a direct person. Pretention annoys me...makes me feel NAUSEOUS...kinda like you.) reaction you certainly seem to have taken it that way. However, your name-calling reeks of the schoolyard and the extreme nature of your response to a perceived insult only serves to illustrate my point.
(repeat that please...did you say schoolyard crybaby)
We reached THAT point months ago. Long before you started coloring your posts with your electronic crayons. (aint they pretty!)Yet you seem unable to follow your own advice...
My participation on the board predates your own,
(does that mean you are senior BS captain?) and it will continue long after you're gone. (
does that mean you WILL BE senior BS captain?[you are SO important]) The NWA forum here is not your private playground to take out your hostilities
(MOVE if you don't LIKE IT)on folks from other airlines or anyone who disagrees with you.(
You have got a lot of nerve with your pompous dictatorial BS)
I never said it didn't, did I? I just don't beat up the rank and file employees of other airlines for decisions made far above their pay grade
(no...you prefer to be a door mat and look the other way at their comments regarding NWA). Do you honestly think that the people who DID make those decisions ever come here?
You could not be more wrong. The UAL technicians are our fellow union members and most NWA technicians I know have expressed nothing but support for them because they realize that it could be us next. You do, however, have a unique grasp of the English language - the word you were trying for was 'nauseating'
.(the WORD I was trying for AND use WAS and is nauseous, does the school marm need an explanation? usage: Those who insist that nauseous can properly be used only in sense 1 and that in sense 2 it is an error for nauseated are mistaken. Current evidence shows these facts: nauseous is most frequently used to mean physically affected with nausea, figurative use is quite a bit less frequent. Use of nauseous in sense 1 is much more often figurative than literal, and this use appears to be losing ground to nauseating. Nauseated is used more widely than nauseous in sense 2. Stop trying to sound intellectually superior...you WILL lose that one with me... )
Did I ever suggest you should not? No. Feel free to continue your tirades with all the pretty colors and different font sizes,
(like your little cute funny faces?)the only ones reading them are the ones like you - sad, little people looking for some stranger to argue with
.(Well...look who just read it and wrote an full page crybaby report. [snicker][post="281079"][/post]