What's new

Pipeline to China

The pipeline to China

Journey to the other side: Blake Snyder of Marietta, Ga., on United Flight 851 from Chicago to Beijing. He's hoping to sell golf carts to the Chinese.
Chicago to Beijing.
Beaming down from departure monitors at O'Hare International Airport, it seems generic, like any ordinary flight on an international carrier.

But for Elk Grove Township-based United Airlines, and the tens of thousands of business people who fly it, the 14-hour journey to the other side of the world has become a link between Midwestern manufacturers and the churning Far East factories they must tap to compete on the global stage.

It's an entrepreneurial express: aisles of MBAs and modern-day gold-miners hoping to cash in on the world's hottest economy.

This Chicago-to-Beijing route is also a bright spot for financially troubled United. The route helped spring the carrier out of bankruptcy protection, thanks to its popularity and the prices it can command: Round-trip fares range from $1,300 to $2,300. And for the last two years the flights have been packed, crew members say.

To compete with Singapore Airlines and other high-service Asian carriers, United can leave no stone unturned or seat unfilled.

"The Asian routes are a high-priority, high-revenue market and really help the company's bottom line, especially when it comes to the passengers in business and first class. That's where the market is," says John Schrauf, a captain who flies the Chicago-Beijing route and a 27-year United veteran.

On an April flight from Chicago to Beijing, the 747 is brimming with business passengers, elderly tourists and unlikely tour groups, such as a rowdy Christian choir heading to China for a performance.

Reg Harman, a sales operations director for Unisys Corp. in Pennsylvania, has been flying United into Asia for eight years. The flight is short if you're in business class, he says, but long in coach. That creates fierce competition among passengers maneuvering for a cushier ride.

"I have 100,000 frequent-flier miles, so that moves me to the top of the upgrade list," Mr. Harman says. "But there are so many 100Ks flying to China, I'm at the bottom today."

To endure the flight, passengers these days opt for peace and quiet over booze, crew members say. "They do a little work, eat their meal, have their wine, maybe watch a movie and then go to sleep for hours," head flight attendant Suzanne Wieland says. "They've developed their own routine because some of them do this trip multiple times a month."
She can identify the passengers who have stars in their eyes, if not money in their pockets: the aspiring entrepreneurs. "They're usually flying economy," she says, laughing.

During the descent, the capital city comes into view. The Great Wall winds its way through brown, sun-scarred hills. "Welcome to China," the flight attendants say, in Mandarin and English.

The growing travel to Beijing is the result of geography and shifts in the global economy. As a gathering point for air traffic across the U.S., Chicago is an obvious gateway. The Midwest, of course, is also home to manufacturing. And as more companies move production to China and Illinois companies including Motorola Inc., Caterpillar Inc. and Leo Burnett establish offices in its capital, the route is becoming much busier.

"Beijing is clearly the best hub in China," says Graham Atkinson, United's senior vice-president of worldwide sales and alliances. "It's a tremendous platform."

The carrier doesn't track flights by country, but the regional statistics are telling: On flights between the U.S. and the Asia-Pacific region, the April load factor, or percentage of paying passengers on board, was 79%, compared to 77% the year before. Over the last year United also increased capacity to Asia by 6% and saw an 11% jump in the lucrative business of flying cargo across the Pacific. "We don't want to leave any cargo behind because it pays so well," Mr. Schrauf says. "If you take off with less than maximum weight, you're leaving money behind." Sometimes that means standby passengers are left behind instead.

United is trying to get more bodies aboard, too. To keep up with demand, the airline is flying more 747s to Beijing this year. The plane, United's largest, carries 347 passengers, or 89 more than the 777, which also flies the route.

The demand for more seats is, of course, a good thing for United as it struggles with rising fuel costs. A flight between Chicago and Beijing burns about 52,000 gallons of jet fuel. At an average price of $2 a gallon, that's more than $104,000 just to fill up.

The Asia-Pacific region now accounts for 25% of United's capacity and 18% of operating revenue. By contrast, the North American market made up 62% of operating revenue last year. But long-term, the China routes are critical, analysts say.

United is "in the catbird's seat," says Michael Boyd, president of the Boyd Group, a Colorado-based aviation consultant. It has been flying non-stop from Chicago to Beijing since 2001 and to Shanghai since 2004. United, in fact, offers 28 non-stop flights from the U.S. to mainland China each week, more than any other U.S. carrier.

United owes its early lock on China to a fortuitous purchase 20 years ago. A 1952 treaty between the administrations of Chairman Mao and President Harry Truman made Pan American World Airways and Northwest Airlines the only U.S. carriers allowed to fly into China. When United bought bankrupt Pan Am's Pacific division for $715 million in 1986, the China routes came with it.

United and Northwest are also the only U.S. carriers with rights to take passengers in Japan to other points in Asia, giving them more flexibility to offer backdoor routes from the U.S. into China.

But United's lead is no sure thing. Restrictions limiting the number of carriers that can fly into the country have been loosening. After 14 years of lobbying, American Airlines got a green light from the Chinese government last year. Since April it has offered non-stop flights to Shanghai out of United's backyard: O'Hare. Last year, Continental Airlines also got permission to fly nonstop to Beijing from Newark, N.J.

To bolster its Sino service, United has entered code-sharing agreements with Shanghai Airlines, and has brought Air China into its global Star Alliance.

United's Mr. Atkinson says the airline has also been working diplomatic channels to expand for the long run and hopes to see more routes open up next year.

United is looking to cultivate flights to southern China hotbed cities like Guangzhou, the booming capital of Guangdong Province and home to 11 million people. "We will be making an aggressive attempt to win those, but there are still some airlines that don't have any service to China. It will be a well-fought battle," Mr. Atkinson says.

It's also a tough sell in Beijing, where government officials are wary of foreign competition. "The Chinese government is nervous about open skies," Mr. Atkinson says. "As their industry becomes more sophisticated they have some angst that U.S. carriers will obtain a head start in the market."

Analysts cite other sticking points, too. A key, says Aaron Gellman, a professor at Northwestern University's Transportation Center, is United's ability to acquire enough planes for a rapidly growing Asian market.

"They're paying plenty of attention to opportunities in Asia," says Mr. Gellman. But if United can't fully cash in on China, he says, it will be due to a lack of financial resources, "not a lack of will."

Until then, United is focusing on the planes it already has flying to China. It's spending $165 million this year to upgrade first- and business-class areas on these and other international flights.

Then there's the potentially lucrative flip side of the China boom: Chinese business people traveling to the Midwest to do deals or cultivate manufacturing ties. And while China still has restrictions on traveling abroad, outbound tourist travel is picking up, observers say, and stands to only climb higher.

To attract these passengers, United is touting its recent 20th anniversary of flying to China in various ads. "That's important in an Asian culture where relationships and longevity count," says Mark Russell, United's managing director of the Pacific South.

United is also hyping its vast U.S.-China network. "When we look at our Chinese customers' travel profile, we see they're going from Asia into the U.S. and then connecting to a number of different points," Mr. Russell says. "Then they return to the point they entered and head back to yet another point over in China."

This outbound Chinese market is where United might face some of its biggest rivalries, though not from American, Northwest or other domestic brethren. Stiff competition is expected from China's homegrown airlines, which, despite limited infrastructure and logistical capabilities, are starting to show signs of life, particularly Air China and China Southern. China Southern already has well-booked routes from Los Angeles to Guangzhou, among others.

"They're in the Bronze Age," says Richard Aboulafia, vice-president at Teal Group, an aviation analysis firm in Virginia. "But give these Chinese carriers 10 years. They may wear Mao jackets from time to time, but these are capitalists. They can't help themselves."

Neither, it seems, can Chicago's own capitalists, packing United's planes with an odd mix of trepidation and big dreams.

On a recent flight, Mark Rotblatt, president of Vanguard Chemical Corp., sits in business class. It's his first trip to the Chinese mainland, where he hopes to do some prospecting for his family-owned company in Crestwood, which makes industrial solvents and degreasers for the printing industry.

"As a manufacturer, I'm seeing more and more of the work that was done in Chicago being done there," he says. "You can't ignore the future, and the future is China."
 
Sounds like UA needs some 777-200LR for service to Guanzou. Also UA did fly to India, they did before the Ch 11, it needs to again. Upgrading the airplanes also needs to done, new planes. While UA has been in BK for 4 years the Asians have been getting new 777-300ER, they make UA's older 777's look shabby. UA needs to decide soon.
 
Sounds like UA needs some 777-200LR for service to Guanzou. Also UA did fly to India, they did before the Ch 11, it needs to again. Upgrading the airplanes also needs to done, new planes. While UA has been in BK for 4 years the Asians have been getting new 777-300ER, they make UA's older 777's look shabby. UA needs to decide soon.

WERE in bankruptcy for 3 years.
 
Adding 773ER or 772LR to UA's fleet would be another engine type.
 
And the price of not getting 777-200LR or 300ER is? less then a whole new family of planes. IF UA orders 787, no Pratt & Whitney's are available, only Rolls and GE. P & W is old news in the engine biz, the next UA planes will have something else. A380's or 747-8 will have an entirely new engine for UA, so new is coming no matter what flavor we get.
 
And the price of not getting 777-200LR or 300ER is?

The deterioration of UA’s position in Asia, just like what UA has allowed to happen to its markets in Europe and Latin America, regions of the world where UA is 4th among US airlines; in Latin America, that would be dead last despite UA’s acquisition of PA’s Latin network.

With NW and CO first in line for 787s and DL widely rumored to be ready to order LRs, UA’s markets will suddenly get crowded – and that’s just with airlines on this side of the Pacific.

The Pacific is what has pulled UA out of rough spots for many years and it is also why UA probably didn’t get more serious about cutting costs on the domestic system during its 3 year run in bankruptcy. Revenue incursion from other airlines is likely to occur on the Pacific and could be precisely the trigger that pushes UA into its second and final bankruptcy.
 
World how is the DL service to china? Does Bubba speak anything but Panda Express? Also, the lack of 777's at DL is startling. Perhaps you could resurrect the MD-11's for some fine international service.

UAL has 777's and 400's. DL has squat. Also, your atlantic yields are being eroded drastically in the european theater. Can't wait to see DL come after you guys for round 3.

Oh by the way before UAL enters it's second and final bk as you describe it. When is DL going to exit? I see they need an extension because they don't have workable business plan. That might be a concern of yours... JUst possibly?

Also, glad to see you are copying the UAL Premium Service idea. When DL has an original thought let us know?
 
Aw, just ignore the poor guy.

He's majorly distressed that the love of his life is on the brink of going out of existence. So he needs something to take his mind off the woeful state of affairs at DL.

Kinda sad, really.

Slow day at the office, WT?
 
The deterioration of UA’s position in Asia, just like what UA has allowed to happen to its markets in Europe and Latin America, regions of the world where UA is 4th among US airlines; in Latin America, that would be dead last despite UA’s acquisition of PA’s Latin network.

With NW and CO first in line for 787s and DL widely rumored to be ready to order LRs, UA’s markets will suddenly get crowded – and that’s just with airlines on this side of the Pacific.

The Pacific is what has pulled UA out of rough spots for many years and it is also why UA probably didn’t get more serious about cutting costs on the domestic system during its 3 year run in bankruptcy. Revenue incursion from other airlines is likely to occur on the Pacific and could be precisely the trigger that pushes UA into its second and final bankruptcy.


DAL has pinned it's hopes of improving revenue (after the colossal blunder of simplifares) on European expansion. While Asia is the future, the problems you portend in your post above are already happening in Europe, where it will only get worse with low frills transatlantic carriers sprouting up.

One man's push to a second and final bankruptcy for UAL, could be the other's last nail in the coffin that keeps DAL from ever emerging at all.

UAL is not resting on it's cash laurels (like DAL did) hoping others would go out of business and solve their problems for them. United is aggressively continuing to change the structure of the company and the deployment of it's assets. It will continue to leap ahead of DAL and others without the onerous restrictions of court supervised restructuring,

How is that for a WT impression??


JBG
 
[/quote name='magsau' date='Jun 28 2006, 09:36 PM'
UAL has 777's and 400's.[/quote]
yeah and they are falling apart...at least on the inside. which leads one to wonder about the outside.
 
[/quote name='magsau' date='Jun 28 2006, 09:36 PM'
UAL has 777's and 400's.
yeah and they are falling apart...at least on the inside. which leads one to wonder about the outside.


Really falling apart? You mean parts are actually falling off the aircraft? If so are you speaking from first hand knowledge? If you are just another frustrated DL employee then move along.

I have yet to fly a 400 with anything falling off it, inside or out.
 
Every 747 I've flown in the past month has numerous writeups that have been going out unfixed...most notably the cart lift...to and from LHR and from SYD. Then the usual seat writeups, coffeemakers, ovens not working etc. Those are important tools when doing international services. I thought Int'l would be different, but it seems there are just more supervisors running around looking busy but getting little done.

Hence, my questioning regarding the exterior of the airplane, i.e. engines, structure. If what goes on in the inside of the cabin is any indication....then what the hell might be going on on the outside. I don't have any faith in this airline anymore. Safety is NOT our number one priority anymore, as far as I'm concerned. ROP is our only concern. Loss of an airliner because of an accident is probably just a calculated liability anymore. I seriously doubt the airline is concerned about safety and loss of life. My only faith is in the pilots not flying a broken plane, and being able to land one that does breaak. Zero faith in management keeping the airline safe. There are lots of stories out there about management hushing up mechanics concerns.
 
Spacewaitress,

That is a very damning statement. I sense your frustration and can certainly understand where it's coming from, since I'm sure you often have to explain to customers the interior deficiencies of United's fleet. But to come out and say that United has no concern for the safety of its aircraft, and thus, its employees and customers, is a very, very strong statement to be making. Given the high degree of professionalism of the United pilot ranks, I sincerely doubt any captain would take an aircraft away from the gate if it was not airworthy and safe. To assume otherwise is misguided in my opinion.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top