What's new

Planned Parenthood Sets New Record

How do you look the other way on her radical racist statements or are you in agreement with them?

Well dell, you don't have to agree with 100% of what someone is saying. Take a long hard look at the southern tier of red states and you'll find a lot of folks who don't cotton to "race mixing" and typically refer to a person of the black race by using a word that rhymes with jigger.
 


IT's kind of funny because if your read her stuff, it becomes apparent that conservatives are preaching pretty much the exact same thing to "fix" our society....a two parent household. Not relying on welfare. Taking responsiblity for bettering yourself.

Maybe so, but why does the democratic party go out of their way to subvert what you just brought up with so many entitlements?
 
Well dell, you don't have to agree with 100% of what someone is saying. Take a long hard look at the southern tier of red states and you'll find a lot of folks who don't cotton to "race mixing" and typically refer to a person of the black race by using a word that rhymes with jigger.

Yeah, the southern democrats were a beach back then.
 
Maybe so, but why does the democratic party go out of their way to subvert what you just brought up with so many entitlements?

Because we don't believe in starving babies that have already been born...and which is why we don't mind our tax dollars paying the light bill at planned parenthood so that maybe these folks can get birth control to keep the baby from being born in the first place. The right wing wants to rip title X funding from planned parenthood because "they perform abortions". They PREVENT millions more than they perform, but that gets overlooked by the "entitlement spending" crowd.
 
Libertarian gin soaked thoughts are running rampant tonight.

In all your flaunting of your recent educational accomplishments and being the family Ellis Island success story, you continually blow it out of the park with comments like this.
 
Yeah, the southern democrats were a beach back then.

Wish they had a tongue in cheek emoticon. I think Jesse Helms felt so strongly for rights for negros back in '64 that he became a republican so he could help them more. SAme thing for Strom Thurmond. Guys like that CARED about the black man and they wanted to distance themselves from those racist democrats.
 
Because we don't believe in starving babies that have already been born...and which is why we don't mind our tax dollars paying the light bill at planned parenthood so that maybe these folks can get birth control to keep the baby from being born in the first place. The right wing wants to rip title X funding from planned parenthood because "they perform abortions". They PREVENT millions more than they perform, but that gets overlooked by the "entitlement spending" crowd.

And you take the three neg votes to add God to your platform only to be overridden by the chair.....and try and make me weep with your party's parasitic values.
 
Wish they had a tongue in cheek emoticon. I think Jesse Helms felt so strongly for rights for negros back in '64 that he became a republican so he could help them more. SAme thing for Strom Thurmond. Guys like that CARED about the black man and they wanted to distance themselves from those racist democrats.

What about your boys who founded the KKK after the war? Little enforcement arm for the party? Just keep them neggra's in check...thats all.
 
And you take the three neg votes to add God to your platform only to be overridden by the chair.....and try and make me weep with your party's parasitic values.

My party? Heaven's no. I'm a free thinker and I don't rely on a party to tell me what I should and should not believe. Last I heard, God wasn't voting on any laws.
 
My party? Heaven's no. I'm a free thinker and I don't rely on a party to tell me what I should and should not believe. Last I heard, God wasn't voting on any laws.

If you are so much the free thinker, why then are you defending the party's values here and now.
But your party showed its core values right there upfront for the world to see.
 
What about your boys who founded the KKK after the war? Little enforcement arm for the party? Just keep them neggra's in check...thats all.

Well dell...a funny thing happened after the civil rights act of 64. A lot of democrats turned republican. The republicans of 1865 aren't anything like the repbulicans of today. Those guys would be shouted down as "liberals" today. People change. The democrats who "kept nigras in check" are republicans today. The ones in 64 who wanted to keep their seat in congress "converted" in teh Southern Strategy in 1968. You certainly ARE describing the democrats from 1865 to 1964. But not the ones post 64.
 
Libertarian gin soaked thoughts are running rampant tonight.





Source: Murray Rothbard - Famous Libertarian and Your Person i guess...

It's what I advocate as well so what's your point? I have my own beliefs on abortion and they ae between me and God. So if you do't believe in abortion don't have one.

Sanger was a Eugenicist and racist. The views do not IMO mesh with those of a free society.

 

Attachments

  • SangeII.webp
    SangeII.webp
    2 KB · Views: 258
If you are so much the free thinker, why then are you defending the party's values here and now.
But your party showed its core values right there upfront for the world to see.

I'm not defending any party's values. I am defending MY values. I happen to believe that birth control is a GOOD thing. I don't think that abortion as a form of birth control is right, but I don't want to ban them because there ARE situations where they are necessary. Trust me on this. So you have to take the good with the bad. Kind of like guns. PP mostly provides birth control but 3% of their business is abortions. Gun owners like to hunt, but there's a percentage of them that pick up an AR15 and shoot up schools. You don't support an outright ban on guns....I don't support an outright ban on abortions.
 
Well dell...a funny thing happened after the civil rights act of 64. A lot of democrats turned republican. The republicans of 1865 aren't anything like the repbulicans of today. Those guys would be shouted down as "liberals" today. People change. The democrats who "kept nigras in check" are republicans today. The ones in 64 who wanted to keep their seat in congress "converted" in teh Southern Strategy in 1968. You certainly ARE describing the democrats from 1865 to 1964. But not the ones post 64.

But without the Republicans, LBJ's civil rights act would have never passed.....ask Bobby Byrd.
 
It's what I advocate as well so what's your point? I have my own beliefs on abortion and they ae between me and God. So if you do't believe in abortion don't have one.

Sanger was a Eugenicist and racist. The views do not IMO mesh with those of a free society.


Could they not afford a live narrator...And where in that did she say she agreed that niggrahs were inferior?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top