What's new

Religious folks..LESS intelligent than Atheists !............(Study)

http://news.yahoo.co...23.html#upCr476

I'm not aiming this specifically at christions,(lest eolesen brands me a religious bigot) (I'm just passing along this very interesting study), ..this goes for Jews, Muslims, Hindu's, Buddhists, Jehova witness's, Mormans ETC. as well.
Native americans get a pass, because they're Spiritual, not religious, as I have been , thankfully these last Ten Years.

In these last ten years, I've SERIOIUSLY (NO Spin).. asked EVERY doctor i've seen,...be they optomitrists, G Practitioners, Gastro......Endorcin........Surgeons...You name it etc..... That to the best of their vast knowlege,...if a female can get pregnant via an IMMACULATE CONCEPTION. Each and everyone has responded NO. (The female docs...EMPHATICALLY NO) !
Believe it or not, I have had deeply religious Muslims tell me that the Quoran..BELIEVES in.. I C, obviously referring to J C,...But says thier 'book' says...'NOT the son of God' ! Jews say..NO..I, C. AND NO...S-O-G.

Fast forward, I'm Very glad that in my later years, science becomes/bacame available to DEBUNK All religions for the Frauds that they have been for sooooo long, and the Billions upon Billions of good people that 'they have hijacked' !

As for ceationism vs evolution,..? My 'jury-is-still-out. Now as to the intelliigence, vs lesser intelligence, well let me just say...look at which area in the country is MOST Religious. !!!!!!!!!!!!

(As the 'brothers on the BB playground always say....BALL don't LIE !!! )

With all this ranting about how correct this article is, I see no one has actually seen the analysis, or care to do so. So who's the ID-10T?

You all believe this because it fits your agenda, you require no empirical proof, just hyperbole.

From your link:
[quote]The studies used in Zuckerman's paper included a life-long analysis of the beliefs of a group of 1,500 gifted children - those with IQs over 135 - in a study which began in 1921 and continues today.[/quote]
So 1500 people with IQ's over 135 makes up a total analysis?
Sure, why not, after all, it is what you believe... 😛

Where is the data?
B) xUT
 
And Jim Jones, Bin Laden, Timothy McVeigh, the IRA, and the Sikh killer dude, and most others of their ilk, were deeply "religious".

So....
 
What a bunch of crap!
The more I research this 'data' the more I find it is crap data.
Most (if not all) subjects were USA college students.

Hey, If it's true, it's true. However this hypothesis is based on a narrow field of select subjects.

Wonder what their control questions were?

B) xUT
 
So what?
Your baseline is not mine.
Try again.
Try bringing some empirical data and verified statistical analysis here.
I don't care if your 'belief' is different from mine, but at least support your argument.
 
I didn't mention or bring up the study, or who was smarter.

I did ask why believe things that do not make sense.

I also pointed out, in response to your Ted K comment, the atheist genus as you called him, that there are plenty of examples of evil deeds committed by deeply religious geniuses. (Genii...? I freely admit I am not one, and do not know the plural of genius-- so don't accuse me of being Tree again. I am quite sure that is unfair to him.)
 
I didn't mention or bring up the study, or who was smarter.

I did ask why believe things that do not make sense.
You replied to this thread. What do you expect?
I am not a mind reader.
You believe what you want.

I also pointed out, in response to your Ted K comment, the atheist genus as you called him, that there are plenty of examples of evil deeds committed by deeply religious geniuses.

There are plenty of ruthless people all around.
Regardless of beliefs.

(Genii...? I freely admit I am not one, and do not know the plural of genius-- so don't accuse me of being Tree again. I am quite sure that is unfair to him.)

If you look, I never accused you of being Ms Tree.
Try to keep up... Eh?

If you are going to post the clap trap to support the OP and the flawed data analysis, then that's what you get.
Don't like it?
Don't post.

I am usually a reasonable person and try to look at all sides.

Regards,
B) xUT
 
You replied to this thread. What do you expect?
I am not a mind reader.
You believe what you want.



There are plenty of ruthless people all around.
Regardless of beliefs.



If you look, I never accused you of being Ms Tree.
Try to keep up... Eh?

If you are going to post the clap trap to support the OP and the flawed data analysis, then that's what you get.
Don't like it?
Don't post.

I am usually a reasonable person and try to look at all sides.

Regards,
B) xUT

Apples don't fall far from the TREE.....
 
And Jim Jones, Bin Laden, Timothy McVeigh, the IRA, and the Sikh killer dude, and most others of their ilk, were deeply "religious".

So....

So insanity runs among humanity and some use religion as a shield. What's with McVeigh? I don't recall religion. Why not bring up Heaven's Gate, Ted Bundy, Zodiac, Columbine, Aurora, etc., and the many GODLESS individuals that were probably atheists???
 
So insanity runs among humanity and some use religion as a shield. What's with McVeigh? I don't recall religion. Why not bring up Heaven's Gate, Ted Bundy, Zodiac, Columbine, Aurora, etc., and the many GODLESS individuals that were probably atheists???
I made the original inference with the Ted Kaczynski post.
Just to be fair.
B) xUT
 
"There are plenty of ruthless people all around.
Regardless of beliefs."


That was the point of my reply...

Ut.. It wasn't you that accuses me of being Tree... Just figured itmwas coming, from somewhere, sometime soon...
 
"There are plenty of ruthless people all around.
Regardless of beliefs."


That was the point of my reply...

Ut.. It wasn't you that accuses me of being Tree... Just figured itmwas coming, from somewhere, sometime soon...

Fear of your cover being blown.
 
Back
Top