Apparently you are of the belief that only white male property owners are capable of making decisions for the entire US.
I guess that would invalidate the Constitution and Declaration of Independence in your opinion as well, since those founding documents were predominantly written by white male property owners.
And the whole Revolutionary War was a farce, since it was fought largely by white male property owners.
Fact is, regardless of their gender or color, as much as it may gall you, they *are* representative, since they were duly elected.
Unless I missed something, there have been a lot more than white male property owners bothered to vote for the last two centuries. And these are who *they* chose to represent them.
You can continue to vote based on plumbing and skin color if you wish, but I'll take the person most likely to represent my views when conducting the business of the country. Doesn't matter to me if they're a black transgendered athiest --- if they lean Libertarian or Conservative, they'll still get my vote over a white property owning liberal. I think Mia Love was one of the best candidates out there, and hope to see her win her district this next time around.
You're such a hypocrite, Tree. You constantly harp on how life and politics shouldn't be influenced by religion, so why, pray tell, is it so important to what skin color, genitalia, or sexual preference a particular politician has?...
