Back to the topic...
mweiss:
I agree that there isn't much flawed about the "contents" of the current plan.
My argument is that the flaws are in the implementation and lack of certain areas in the plan.
1. I feel that this plan should have been implemented in BK or earlier. Why UAIR execs did not look for a new path when BK was clearly on the path ahead is beyond me.
2. This plan is for survival, which is not assured at this point. That is indicated to me by the lack of a future plan. There is no fleet simplification, no Express carrier simplification part of this plan, that I know of. Surely, if fleet simplification was part of the plan, the company would not have ordered 2 different types of 70-seat regional jet.