WorldTraveler said:
nobody is threatening anyone.
...Except for you, of course...
If a few DL employees are too stupid to know that it isn't smart to be posting comments about DL's performance based on internal goals, then far it be of from to provide a friendly word of warning.
Ah, now I see. I'm simply stupid, and need to be saved from myself. Thanks!
Some people can't miss an opportunity to provide a dig to their employer even if it risks their own employment - and then they have the nerve to argue about how unfair the company is.
Remind us again where I "dug" on your former employer. If continuous improvement and customer service are not the goals here, then I must've missed the memo.
You can't kvetch about the privileges of being a DL employee and then use the information you gain from their internal systems - which you acknowledged you had done - to make conclusions and then post them only by hiding behind "I can't tell you the data." What you SHOULDN'T have done is even made the statement about how well DL performed if you don't want to post the data.
Remind us again where I've "kvetched" about any sort of privileges. Wasn't me who talked of waltzing into break rooms and galleys...
...And what you shouldn't have done was again try to goad me into posting internal data, and then balked when I refused...
Sidebar: I think it's just great-and curious- that you & Josh occasionally use the same key words. Just sayin'...
The question about the performance of the ATL hub was answered - BY ME - with publicly available data
...And everyone else who weighed in. You just wanted to paint a good news story, and while there some good to be had-as I noted)- there's a lot that can-and should be learned. You can't control the weather, but you can control how it's reacted to. As I noted earlier, we have a lot of great systems/plans in place for these types of events. All I'm saying is that I'm not sure we executed as well as we could've. If you think that violates the posted media policy, then by means report me. It wouldn't be the first time...
But working within established structures never has been your forte, now has it, Kevin?
Not a fan of "go along to get along."
Your sidekick Q is a little short on reading comprehension if he thinks that the use of the word "we're" implies I am a DL employee.
Not in the context you used it in, he's not.
WorldTraveler said:
I'm not narcing on anyone. Given that this is a public forum, nobody has to narc on Kev or anyone else who willfully violates the company's media policy.
See above.
I am saying that this supposed DL employee who tells everyone else that they are in such a privileged position ought to have the brains to realize that posting internal company information - including analysis of the data he has seen on it - is not smart.
...Which is why I refused to do so, despite your attempts to get me to do just that...
What's that say about one's character, anyway?
LD3 said:
You could not have said that any better....
+1