What's new

Supreme Court and Marriage equality/Obamacare ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ms Tree said:
Because you are ignorant of the Constitution and willing to deprive a person(s) of equality because you disagree with them makes you a conservative.
 
Speaking of equality, Here you go.
 
I told you this would be the next step.......hope you enjoy......
 
 
Excerpted from the Northern Colorado Gazette:


 

Using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.
Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits.
 
“Gay” advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.
In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists with B4U-Act recently held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.
B4U-Act calls pedophiles “minor-attracted people.” The organization’s website states its purpose is to, “help mental health professionals learn more about attraction to minors and to consider the effects of stereotyping, stigma and fear.”
In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”
Pedophilia has already been granted protected status by the Federal Government. The Matthew Shephard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act lists “sexual orientation” as a protected class; however, it does not define the term.
Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying that “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation;” however, the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fl) stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law. “This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans, regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these ‘philias’ and fetishes and ‘isms’ that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule.”
The White House praised the bill saying, “At root, this isn’t just about our laws; this is about who we are as a people. This is about whether we value one another – whether we embrace our differences rather than allowing them to become a source of animus.”
Earlier this year two psychologists in Canada declared that pedophilia is a sexual orientation just like homosexuality or heterosexuality.
Van Gijseghem, psychologist and retired professor of the University of Montreal, told members of Parliament, “Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offense from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality.”
He went on to say, “True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation. He may, however, remain abstinent.”
When asked if he should be comparing pedophiles to homosexuals, Van Gijseghem replied, “If, for instance, you were living in a society where heterosexuality is proscribed or prohibited and you were told that you had to get therapy to change your sexual orientation, you would probably say that that is slightly crazy. In other words, you would not accept that at all. I use this analogy to say that, yes indeed, pedophiles do not change their sexual orientation.”
Dr. Quinsey, professor emeritus of psychology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, agreed with Van Gijseghem. Quinsey said pedophiles’ sexual interests prefer children and, “There is no evidence that this sort of preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else.”

In July, 2010 Harvard health Publications said, “Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and unlikely to change. Treatment aims to enable someone to resist acting on his sexual urges.”
Linda Harvey, of Mission America, said the push for pedophiles to have equal rights will become more and more common as LGBT groups continue to assert themselves. “It’s all part of a plan to introduce sex to children at younger and younger ages; to convince them that normal friendship is actually a sexual attraction.”

Milton Diamond, a University of Hawaii professor and director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society, stated that child pornography could be beneficial to society because, “Potential sex offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex against children.”
Diamond is a distinguished lecturer for the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco. The IASHS openly advocated for the repeal of the Revolutionary war ban on homosexuals serving in the military.
The IASHS lists, on its website, a list of “basic sexual rights” that includes “the right to engage in sexual acts or activities of any kind whatsoever, providing they do not involve nonconsensual acts, violence, constraint, coercion or fraud.” Another right is to, “be free of persecution, condemnation, discrimination, or societal intervention in private sexual behavior” and “the freedom of any sexual thought, fantasy or desire.” The organization also says that no one should be “disadvantaged because of age.”
[Note: the website also says in its mission statement: The Institute is dedicated to the belief that sexual rights are basic human rights and it is appropriate to help students understand that many people have been hurt, falsely imprisoned, harassed and persecuted because of laws and misinformation about the role and place of sexuality and its many expressions by individuals in our society.
Sex offender laws protecting children have been challenged in several states including California, Georgia and Iowa. Sex offenders claim the laws prohibiting them from living near schools or parks are unfair because it penalizes them for life.
 
11036705_1118199554874333_6213115607542312233_n.jpg
 
In Order to get married you need a license.
 
A license is nothing more than the government charging you a fee to issue rights that already exist.
 
Common law does not require a license so far as I am aware. Marriage is a contract. The signatories on the license are bound by the laws of the contract. The license is not about the fees.
 
SparrowHawk said:
In Order to get married you need a license.
 
A license is nothing more than the government charging you a fee to issue rights that already exist.
I will remember that next time my 10 year old nephew wants to drive a car.
 
I suppose you think people should be able to get married without a blood test?
 
Why should someone have a license to do electrical wiring or plumbing in your home?
 
A license is designed to reinforce standards and I for one support them.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
I will remember that next time my 10 year old nephew wants to drive a car.
 
I suppose you think people should be able to get married without a blood test?
 
Why should someone have a license to do electrical wiring or plumbing in your home?
 
A license is designed to reinforce standards and I for one support them.
Clueless,

You dont need a blood test anymore to get a marriage license .
 
They have to have a license to get liability insurance in case what they did to the plumbing or electrical cause an accident or damage to someone's house.
 
Do you ever think before you post?
 
700UW said:
Its apparent you dont get concept of this board.
 
You made claims about Roberts, ACHA, Gay Marriage, SCOTUS and COTUS.
 
Now back them up with facts, not your usual misinformation.
 
 
So back up your claims or admit its just your opinion and not factual.
I have no interest in going on a fact finding mission who's finding you will ignore anyway.
 
Every claim I have backed by proof on this site has been ignored or dismissed by the liberals on this forum. After so many times I just quit wasting my time.
 
I will waste no more effort trying to penetrate liberal blinders. Liberals see exactly what they want to see.
 
It is enough for me to put out the information. If someone sees it and does a little of their own research then I feel I accomplished my task.
 
Now run along. 
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
I will remember that next time my 10 year old nephew wants to drive a car.
 
I suppose you think people should be able to get married without a blood test?
 
Why should someone have a license to do electrical wiring or plumbing in your home?
 
A license is designed to reinforce standards and I for one support them.
Your post has absolutely nothing to do with what Sparrow is talking about.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
I will remember that next time my 10 year old nephew wants to drive a car.
 
I suppose you think people should be able to get married without a blood test?
 
Why should someone have a license to do electrical wiring or plumbing in your home?
 
A license is designed to reinforce standards and I for one support them.
 
 
The blood test in question only covers a few diseases, syphilis among them.
 
I support the right of the people to live as they choose.
 
Don't believe in Gay Marriage? Don't have one
 
Sparrow stated that a license is just a way for the government to collect fees.
 
My response is the idea behind a license is to enforce standards.
 
700UW said:
You dont need a blood test anymore to get a marriage license .
You do in some states.
 
700UW said:
 
 
Funny how the Pope (in the very same Encyclical) also slammed ABORTION and TRANSGENDER
 
http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/19/popes-encyclical-rejects-abortion-and-gender-theory/
 
 
No Abortion And Contraceptives
 
While Francis sees global warming as a problem, he rejects arguments that contraceptives and abortions should be made more available to developing countries. Advocating for population control, the pope writes, is “refusing to face the issues.”

“Since everything is interrelated, concern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with the justification of abortion. How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties? ‘If personal and social sensitivity towards the acceptance of the new life is lost, then other forms of acceptance that are valuable for society also wither away,'”
“At times, developing countries face forms of international pressure which make economic assistance contingent on certain policies of ‘reproductive health.’ Yet ‘while it is true that an unequal distribution of the population and of available resources creates obstacles to development and a sustainable use of the environment, it must nonetheless be recognized that demographic growth is fully compatible with an integral and shared development.’
 
“To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. It is an attempt to legitimize the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in a way which can never be universalized, since the planet could not even contain the waste products of such consumption. Besides, we know that approximately a third of all food produced is discarded, and ‘whenever food is thrown out it is as if it were stolen from the table of the poor.’ Still, attention needs to be paid to imbalances in population density, on both national and global levels, since a rise in consumption would lead to complex regional situations, as a result of the interplay between problems linked to environmental pollution, transport, waste treatment, loss of resources and quality of life.”
“Since everything is interrelated, concern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with the justification of abortion. How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties? If personal and social sensitivity towards the acceptance of the new life is lost, then other forms of acceptance that are valuable for society also wither away.”
 
A Rejection Of ‘Gender Theory’
In “Laudato Si,” Francis takes time to discuss the idea of “human ecology,” which has been seen as a rejection of “gender theory” that serves as the basis for “transgender identification,” reports The Catholic News Agency. Francis says our bodies are “God’s gift” that should not be manipulated.

“The acceptance of our bodies as God’s gift is vital for welcoming and accepting the entire world as a gift from the Father and our common home, whereas thinking that we enjoy absolute power over our own bodies turns, often subtly, into thinking that we enjoy absolute power over creation.”
“Learning to accept our body, to care for it and to respect its fullest meaning, is an essential element of any genuine human ecology. Also, valuing one’s own body in its femininity or masculinity is necessary if I am going to be able to recognize myself in an encounter with someone who is different. In this way we can joyfully accept the specific gifts of another man or woman, the work of God the Creator, and find mutual enrichment. It is not a healthy attitude which would seek ‘to cancel out sexual difference because it no longer knows how to confront it.’”


 
 
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top