Inconvenient calculations regarding the morality of pricing decisions were thrown out when it was found that more often than not they had a negative effect on the bottom line. This is not a phenomena limited to or originated by US Airways.it is totally wrong for them to take advantage of this tax situation and keep the extra money...
For the rank and file kettles who don't know any better and don't bother to educate themselves then this sneaky fare increase is perfectly fine, nay, expected...but to subject the FF's to the same kind of treatment? Outrage!The vast majority of airline passengers WILL know the difference, ESPECIALLY frequent travelers, and they WILL remember......
Aren't you just a good little socialist? Last I knew US was a private company and will price according to market conditions. How dare they attempt to increase revenue and profit, and how dare that translate into profit sharing for the third qtr. Passengers have demanded $200 rt from coast to coast for too long, and the airlines have obliged. This small increase is minuscule compared to what the airlines should be charging. My God, if people would actually pay a fair fare, the airline may be able to pay their employees what they're worth.Freedom, you are truly clueless. If the airlines can't price their product properly to begin with, it is totally wrong for them to take advantage of this tax situation and keep the extra money...UNLESS, and that is a stretch, when the FAA is reauthorized it will charge back for those tickets sold during the shutdown...which is unlikely if not impossible.
The vast majority of airline passengers WILL know the difference, ESPECIALLY frequent travelers, and they WILL remember......
That said, I am not pointing this exclusively at US.... AA and I believe most of the other majors have joined the club, although the article said as of yesterday only US and AA had raised their fares to keep the tax money. It is just wrong.
Aren't you just a good little socialist? Last I knew US was a private company and will price according to market conditions. How dare they attempt to increase revenue and profit, and how dare that translate into profit sharing for the third qtr. Passengers have demanded $200 rt from coast to coast for too long, and the airlines have obliged. This small increase is minuscule compared to what the airlines should be charging. My God, if people would actually pay a fair fare, the airline may be able to pay their employees what they're worth.
Then speak with your dollars and stay off of the planes. Nobody is holding a gun to your head to buy a ticket. And it is not your right to board a plane. Stay the hell away. Who are you to determine what is fair? When you become the CEO or start your own airline, then we will all expect walk up fares of $400 r/t coast to coast tix.I'm going to ignore the build-up to the key point in your post.
Fair Fares is the key in all of this. As to paying employees "What they're worth", the free market already determined that you aren't worth very much. Not saying it's right or fair, just that in the end the free market rules.
A fare of $1,025 PHL-BUF leaving Monday and returning Tuesday is NOT a Fair Fare, It's gouging pure and simple.
Conversely, $199.00 PHL-LAX is equally unfair to the airline.
Way back when, BBB told FFOCUS that if he could raise the bottom fare $30.00 he could lower the top far by $300.00
I have very little sympathy for the airlines as they through their unbridled arrogance have made the market what it is.
Art, please fly Allegiant or some other dimwitted airline. And no, we won't miss you bringing chocolates and treats on board for the FAs. Most FAs will not eat something a passenger gives them. It goes into the circular file in the air darling. Have fun over at the cattle car. I'm sure you'll be pulling the lever for Obama in 2012 for your government handout.Freedom, you are truly clueless. If the airlines can't price their product properly to begin with, it is totally wrong for them to take advantage of this tax situation and keep the extra money...UNLESS, and that is a stretch, when the FAA is reauthorized it will charge back for those tickets sold during the shutdown...which is unlikely if not impossible.
The vast majority of airline passengers WILL know the difference, ESPECIALLY frequent travelers, and they WILL remember......
That said, I am not pointing this exclusively at US.... AA and I believe most of the other majors have joined the club, although the article said as of yesterday only US and AA had raised their fares to keep the tax money. It is just wrong.
Art, please fly Allegiant or some other dimwitted airline. And no, we won't miss you bringing chocolates and treats on board for the FAs. Most FAs will not eat something a passenger gives them. It goes into the circular file in the air darling. Have fun over at the cattle car. I'm sure you'll be pulling the lever for Obama in 2012 for your government handout.
¿Qué?Aren't you just a good little socialist?
And no, we won't miss you bringing chocolates and treats on board for the FAs. Most FAs will not eat something a passenger gives them. It goes into the circular file in the air darling.
Just because I am a consumer advocate doesn't mean I am a liberal. When you stop collecting taxes, there should be a reduction in the total charge to the customer. You don't raise the fare and keep the difference. That's what is FAIR.Art, please fly Allegiant or some other dimwitted airline. And no, we won't miss you bringing chocolates and treats on board for the FAs. Most FAs will not eat something a passenger gives them. It goes into the circular file in the air darling. Have fun over at the cattle car. I'm sure you'll be pulling the lever for Obama in 2012 for your government handout.
UPDATE: Spirit Airlines CEO: Booking Growth Doubled Since Tax Holiday
By Doug Cameron
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
The head of Spirit Airlines Inc. (SAVE) said Thursday that bookings' growth had doubled since it opted against passing suspended federal taxes on to passengers.
The newly-floated carrier was among a handful to cut fares last week after the budget impasse led to the removal of tax collection powers from the Federal Aviation Administration.
Most airlines are pocketing the windfall, leading to an outcry from lawmakers. However, Spirit Chief Executive Ben Baldanza said passing on the savings had helped lift its year-on-year booking gains to 43% between Saturday and Tuesday, compared with a 23% gain in the first three weeks of the month.
"Our view is that the tax money is the consumer's money. Spirit never had that money," said Baldanza, adding that he didn't expect rivals to have to repay any of the collected levies.
The budget carrier reported pro forma net income of $26.8 million or 37 cents per diluted share for the second quarter.
Operating revenue for the second quarter was $275.9 million,