CLT-Douglas said:
1. With a 90% reduction of service with out US Airways, how quickly could airlines begin to restore some of the lost service to CLT?
Pretty quickly, actually, though the initial response of the network carriers would be to upgauge existing flights and/or add frequency to their hubs. As of 2002, US's share of the domestic O&D traffic at CLT stood at around 64%, or around 8000 seats/day (this is both directions combined). If CO were to upgauge to mainline, DL were to fly 767's to ATL and CVG, UA and AA were to operate 757's or 767's to ORD, DFW, DEN, etc., you'd soon see most of the existing demand satisfied. With its RJ armada, I can see DL as the most likely to offer point-to-point flying from CLT to places like BOS, LGA, DCA, PHL, etc. (i.e. the highest O&D non-hub cities).
The big question is how quickly the LCC's (most likely WN, B6, and FL) would jump in to offer service on some of the more popular routes from CLT. My gut instinct is that you'd see it happen very quickly unless the US leases were tied up somehow in the bankruptcy proceedings.
2. CLT is currently building a new parking garage, and I believe has funding and is starting construction of a third parallel runway already. Plans to double the size of terminal E, the express terminal are also on the drawing board. Is it likely the new runway and terminal E expansion will be canceled as a result to a shut down, or is it likely the airport will go ahead with the plans to be a more attractive hub facility for possible other airlines?
Well, if the new runway is under construction, there's not much they can do but finish it. They can slow down the construction if it will save money, but the federal government is probably paying much of the cost anyway. Going forward with an expansion of Concourse E would seem foolish to me since I do not see the demand existing without the US hub.
3. I am aware of the low O&D Stats at CLT with is a major negative. I am certain that some explanation as to why is because CLT is the most expensive airport for passengers to fly out of in the country. CLT has a lot of positives going for it as it's costs are low, very efficient, great facilities, good year round weather, good centralized east coast location, growing city, low cost of living, very limited LCC competition for now. All factors to lure another airline to use CLT as a hub, but in all likely hood who would be interested how much of it would be US Airways to sell rather then the airports responsibility?
The real value of the CLT hub is only as a functioning, connecting hub. Piedmont spent years building that operation, and it's expensive for airlines to build new hubs bit-by-bit. All the reasons you gave are good reasons for the network carriers and LCC's to add service to CLT, but not enough to justify another airport building a connecting hub there. After all, St. Louis has nearly twice the population of the Charlotte area and yet AA dramatically scaled back the former TWA hub (in part due to WN's presence there, though).
The one wild card here is the fact that CLT is the only real alternative in the region to ATL. But I just can't see any of the legacy carriers having the resources to build a hub at CLT at present. Maybe, just maybe CO or AA.
4. If no other airline is interested in using CLT as a hub, would CLT see a flood of LCC enter or a lot of empty gates and only a slight increase from the other airlines that currently already serve CLT?
I think CLT will look a lot like BNA but with more empty gates. One or more LCC's will come in with a good number of flights (I'm thinking 50-100 total LCC departures after two or three years) but that will still leave a couple of concourses' worth of empty gates.
5. If US Airways fails, Lufthansa would be the only airline offering non stop service to Europe. Is it likely another airline will take over US Airways routes to Europe from CLT if there is no hub airline, or would eventually Lufthansa pull out and all service to Europe will be lost? If another airline did use CLT as a hub, what other routes could be considered?
Most international flying (including Caribbean) would disappear. The LH flight doesn't make sense without US Airways there and in the Star Alliance. The international O&D isn't enough to support the flights.