Let's not.
Instead let's recognize that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and is completely subjective. Just because you can't be bothered doesn't make someone else's delight any less valid...
bothered? with what?
I get that... but ANYONE who has traveled the world knows that US airports are not, by and large, anything close to beautiful.
They are attractive.
can you tell us what global airports you have been in over the last, say, 5 years, that you would say DFW terminal D compares favorably with?
is CLT on your list of cities where you believe DL should have BW mainline agents? or better yet, what cities do you think it is ok for DL NOT to have mainline agents and why?
what other airlines besides US have mainline AW and BW agents at CLT, BTW?
I witnessed it with my own eyes: a grown man and his buddy flying in for the Final Four, amazed at DFW terminal D. Of course he was just stepping off a flight from OMA, but still.
I'm not doubting that someone could be brought to tears in your presence. I'm just saying that he is clearly not the norm for the American population and probably not for the world.
Have you seen those tears at AA's terminal 8 at JFK?
You said it was likely that none of the DEN hubs were profitable and I pointed out how that was patently false. That's all.
no, you didn't point out that DEN is profitable even for F9. If DEN was profitable, F9 wouldn't have cut dramatically and shifted its network away from DEN, now would they?
and again, we're talking about CLT here.
have you seen those tears at CLT?
I'm not sure that anyone could call CLT an attractive airport unless they just came in off the farm to an airport for the 1st time and then it is probably because they are mesmerized by the flight that is taking on OUTSIDE the terminal rather than what is inside.
The ability of AA to succeed or not is not in the least connected with the appearance of the terminal to anyone.
but I suppose it makes something to talk about on an internet forum..