What's new

The Lost Generation

Freedom4all

Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
767
Reaction score
0
Recession Creating A Lost Generation of just 46% Of 16-24 Year-Olds Had A Job Last Month...Lowest Since 1948 :blink:

According to a BusinessWeek analysis, college graduates aged 22 to 27 have fared worse than their older educated peers during the downturn. Two years ago, 84.4% of young grads had jobs, only somewhat lower than the 86.8% figure for college graduates aged 28 to 50. Since then, the employment gap between the two groups has almost doubled.

Thanks Barack, don't choke on that medal of yours. :down:
 
Recession Creating A Lost Generation of just 46% Of 16-24 Year-Olds Had A Job Last Month...Lowest Since 1948 :blink:

According to a BusinessWeek analysis, college graduates aged 22 to 27 have fared worse than their older educated peers during the downturn. Two years ago, 84.4% of young grads had jobs, only somewhat lower than the 86.8% figure for college graduates aged 28 to 50. Since then, the employment gap between the two groups has almost doubled.

Thanks Barack, don't choke on that medal of yours. :down:
Tut tut dapones. You either want the government to take action against this depression or you do not ? Which is it ? Without the bank bailouts ,stimulus ,and take over of the big three unemployment would be even higher ? So what is it you want for our nation?
 
Tut tut dapones. You either want the government to take action against this depression or you do not ? Which is it ? Without the bank bailouts ,stimulus ,and take over of the big three unemployment would be even higher ? So what is it you want for our nation?
Yah? They said if we didn't take the bs stimulus then unemployment would be at 8%. Wheres the jobs? You haven't yet come to terms that this new administration has no idea what their doing. And now they are talking about a Stimulus 2.0? What does that tell you?
 
Maybe it is time to rethink those minimum wage laws that were pushed through when times were good.
 
Yah? They said if we didn't take the bs stimulus then unemployment would be at 8%. Wheres the jobs? You haven't yet come to terms that this new administration has no idea what their doing. And now they are talking about a Stimulus 2.0? What does that tell you?

Don't believe everything you see in the media ,no one I talk with about the economy ever thought the unemployment rate would be 8%. The goverment is taking a middle of the road approch to deal with this ,part of that means misleading the public. Things are far worse than they seem.
 
Tut tut dapones. You either want the government to take action against this depression or you do not ? Which is it ? Without the bank bailouts ,stimulus ,and take over of the big three unemployment would be even higher ? So what is it you want for our nation?

Weren't you the one who wasn't going to pay on their credit cards and mortgages and move into forclosed homes, illeagally ?

If it weren't for people like you, we wouldn't have had to bail-out the banks in the first place.

So , inclosing, this whole mess was caused by you and peolple like you ! :down:
 
Don't believe everything you see in the media, no one I talk with about the economy ever thought the unemployment rate would be 8%. The goverment is taking a middle of the road approch to deal with this ,part of that means misleading the public. Things are far worse than they seem.

It wasn't a claim from the media, it came from the Obama administration. The media reported and fawned over it. And yes things are much worse, thanks to Obama.
 
Let me start off by addressing your comments first southwind ..

Yes I am one of those who advocated that people NOT pay their unsecured debts as I have done .. You can feel free to blame “people like me “ but I should remind you that I predicted much of this economic crisis long before it started , if you want I can find you a link to my DOOM JOURNAL … anyone who pays their credit cards and has no further use for their credit is foolish . In this depression a credit score is about to go the way of the dinosaur .. I’m doing what’s best for MYSELF and using every resource at my disposal to prepare for what’s coming .. And I am VERY aware of what’s yet to come .. I think someday if your able to look back 5 years from now you’ll see that I’m taking the appropriate steps to preserve myself .

As for the issue of breaking into homes and living illegally , that’s not something I’m doing myself , however I fully advocate it .. There are millions of vacant homes , if a person needs shelter and it’s not being used then I say by all means use it . This topic is harder to look at right now in the present , but as unemployment skyrockets and homelessness increases you’ll see more clearly what I mean .. providing shelter for the American population is a national security issue that we will be forced to address at some point further down the line ..


To your points freedom4all … things are actually not that much worse due to obama .. His hands are tied .. If he did NOT print money and backstop the banks, insurance companies etc we would be in a far worse spot today due to deflation . A scary pod cast that I listened to today even talked about signs that deflation is STILL in effect even after the massive amount of printing by the government .

I know that when I say it’s a good thing we kept the banks afloat people start to complain about it … … how would you feel if your social security check wasn’t deposited direct deposit into your bank account , or your paycheck … how would you feel if your credit cards were shut off tomorrow .. And while yes it is happening today for certain people , it’s not happening for everyone .As for the insurance companies , they are necessary for commerce to flourish .. Otherwise when your going to buy a car you had better have the total amount at closing , same goes for homes .

The president is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t …There is no traditional way out of the situation that we find ourselves in . It’s easy for people to forget about the events of last year , but I remember when fear was rife in the markets … today the pure terror has abated , I can’t tell you how many times I hear people saying things like “ oh the economy always recovers give it time “ or “ your so down , look the dow’s at 10,000 “ The population is once again sleeping . This is both good and bad , it’s good because consumers will once again spend money and hope abounds … ( increased consumer spending means a slowing deterioration rate ) this is bad because it’s completely false ..

The most logical thing people can do right now is cash out their 401k’s buy a house with a garden and start gearing up to go the next decade without consumer goods ..

As to your general outlook on the economy freedom4all , I’d say you’re a deflationist … that means you want to see a completely balanced budget , no bank bailouts , no stimulus , nothing of any kind .. Stop for a minute and think about every state government and even the federal government , with an almost 2 trillion deficit for this year the only way to right that ship would be for MASSIVE cuts across every spectrum of the United States ..(now at this point you might say if we hadn’t bailed out banks and whatnot we wouldn’t have that 2 trillion dollar debt , ah but we would due to the collateral fallout in the financial system , in fact all we’ve done is transfer public debt to private debt ) I’m talking wage cuts for all government employees that would still be left after the culling , massive cuts to social services , massive cuts to the military … the amount of money we would have to cut out of the budgets would be paralyzing for our nation … now am I denying that there’s isn’t fat on the governments bone ? Absolutely not , there is probably about a few hundred billion that we can squeeze out of the government by way of cuts … but there are not trillions of dollars ..

Are countries choices are as I see it , either a quick death or a slow death … so far slow doesn’t seem that bad ( and I only say that because I am currently employed ) ..

There is no way out from under debt that is 370% of GDP … :mf_boff:
 
Tut tut dapones. You either want the government to take action against this depression or you do not ? Which is it ? Without the bank bailouts ,stimulus ,and take over of the big three unemployment would be even higher ? So what is it you want for our nation?

Stimulus running out so goes the program.....ask a couple states ready to cave.....

Would have been better to follow BK law and let big three reorganize....

Get your credit card bailout?

The goverment is taking a middle of the road approch to deal with this ,part of that means misleading the public. Things are far worse than they seem.

Which side of the fence suits you best?
 
Stimulus running out so goes the program.....ask a couple states ready to cave.....

Would have been better to follow BK law and let big three reorganize....

Get your credit card bailout?



Which side of the fence suits you best?

Well only two of the 3 would have reorganized (ford is fine ), that smaller one would have closed and GM would have just been ugly ..not mention the losses to the auto suppliers would have been horrific ... the estimates were of 2 to 3 million jobs lost in the worst case scenario .. unacceptable fallout for the american economy at this time ... the damange would have been too much to throw into the mix with everything we were getting hit with at the time .
 
Would have been better to follow BK law and let big three reorganize....


The problem with that, Dell, is that a reorganization would still require financing. No entity, other than the US gov't (and perhaps other gov't institituions that print money), was in a position to finance such reorganizations. Thus, even if they reorganized, taxpayer money would be required. As I have mentioned in previous posts, I was not a fan, in large part, of how that fiasco was handled, but I recognize that a traditional reorg was less than a viable option under the circumstances.
 
The problem with that, Dell, is that a reorganization would still require financing. No entity, other than the US gov't (and perhaps other gov't institituions that print money), was in a position to finance such reorganizations. Thus, even if they reorganized, taxpayer money would be required. As I have mentioned in previous posts, I was not a fan, in large part, of how that fiasco was handled, but I recognize that a traditional reorg was less than a viable option under the circumstances.
The end result (with the government picking the winners and losers) has turned out to be an absolute disaster. Government has no role in private industry dictating terms and leaving secured 1st lien creditors in the lurch. It was a distrubution and bailout of the unions on the tax payers dime. What have we got in return? Zippo!
 
To your points freedom4all … things are actually not that much worse due to obama ..
What? Obama added 1.4 trillion in less then a year in office. That's 3x more then Bush in all 8 years, including the wars in Irag and Afghanistan.

I'm not going to address the rest of your diatribe. Its pure rubbish and incoherent.
 
you cannot spend your way out of debt!

the money that is used to "fix" one problem, creates another one!

tripling the debt, considering another bail out while proposing universal health care all paid by the government is not going to fix anything!

(well its probably going to eliminate social security for starters!)

taking a trillion dollars and 'paying the bills off'..you still have a trillion dollars to pay back.

triple that and then add to it and then propose to add (spend) more??

!! :blink: O.M.G. :blink: !!

this is not rocket science to figure out that it will never work!
 
What? Obama added 1.4 trillion in less then a year in office. That's 3x more then Bush in all 8 years, including the wars in Irag and Afghanistan.

I'm not going to address the rest of your diatribe. Its pure rubbish and incoherent.
I'll make it simple. That 1.4 trillion spent by the government was necessary to prevent futher losses in the economy.

If the government had not back stoped the banks and different industries the economic panic would have continued.

Think of it as fire fighting.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top