What's new

" Uh, Oh. Steve Bannon Protege , "Judge ROY " is a DIDDLER"

Even bigger difference between sexual activity between adults and child molestation. If the young girl (or boy) is under the age of consent (usually 18), his/her ability to consent to something with an adult is non-existent. By definition it is non-consensual and considered to be molestation. Now before someone gets their panties wadded and in a twist, note I did not name any names, period, adult or child. Just making an observation.
 
Last edited:
Whoopee friggin deen.......where were you when Crinton ruined a 20 yr old and a couple other women....

Making all the same issues about due process and lack of evidence...

Until the DNA on Monica's dress showed up, Clinton was presumed innocent.
 
24910057_1990038774570804_8219042814151400964_n.jpg
 
And the diddled are assumed to be liars.
I feel there may be some in it for their five minutes of fame, or $$$$, or both! I believe that's a given. Just because those who are accusers are females, you can't assume they are telling the truth. And if you never had a women lie to you, you are either anti-social! Or you live by yourself in Mussel shell Montana. And yes, there is such a place!
 
Last edited:
And the diddled are assumed to be liars.

We don't throw away the basis of our legal system just because you find a particular claim repugnant. Until the burden of proof is met -or- someone confesses, they're presumed innocent.

There are far too many cases where people were tried and hung (some literally, and others simply in the court of public opinion) who were later found out to be falsely accused. It starts with the ~25 people who died in the Salem Witch Trials and has happened as recently as the Duke Lacrosse team.
 
I feel there may be some in it for their five minutes of fame, or $$$$, or both! I believe that's a given. Just because those who are accusers are females, you can't assume they are telling the truth.

Hanging someone in the court of public opinion?
 
Back
Top