Coffee_Tea_Or_Me
Senior
BWI is a great airport with nice facilities. US should have capitalized on BWI's potential and expanded internationally there. BWI is just as close to downtown DC as is IAD.
US was too busy trying to beat CALite, with their penny fares.
remember their GSO hub? 🙂
Still can't book them on the website, even though yesterday's press release claims you can. <_<
Yes you're right, Long haired, fat bellied,snaggled tooth,beer drinking ones who love bikes and bring their husbands with them! Becareful of my x!!Well I guess we'll see the usual DAB crowd in CLT when Bike Week comes around. Ya know the ones....gals with huge teeters and Jack Daniels t-shirts hangin out all over and guys with half a strand of hair pulled back into their brades. Did I just describe my daddy? 😱 I have family just outside of DAB so it will be nice to have the ability to nonrev there though as mentioned flights were usually full, full, full.
Yes. If an airline with good, strong management like Continental cannot make a lowfare subsidiary work, it shows it is a bad idea.
After 9-11, I always thought US should have kept Metrojet and implemented a C scale wage for the workers.
It's nice of US to add in a new city and expand the market(s) even though it's Saturday only but I bet the reason for growth is to put aircrafts on profitable routes.
These pathetic ERAU kids need more real world airline experience...so who's doing the ground/airport staffing? US or Piedmont? or DGA
I guess old US figured they better match WN since at that time they were invading BWI.
That's basically it - if they hadn't matched the lower fares offered by the likes of WN and CalLite, the planes probably would NOT have been "full, full, full". Of course, that leaves open the question of whether less full airplanes with higher fares would have been more profitable (or less unprofitable) - a question that none of us can answer.US was too busy trying to beat CALite, with their penny fares.
Pick your poison.That's basically it - if they hadn't matched the lower fares offered by the likes of WN and CalLite, the planes probably would NOT have been "full, full, full". Of course, that leaves open the question of whether less full airplanes with higher fares would have been more profitable (or less unprofitable) - a question that none of us can answer.
Jim
The proverbial Sword of Damocles hanging over the head of any airline with lower cost competition.....Pick your poison.
Well said.The proverbial Sword of Damocles hanging over the head of any airline with lower cost competition.....
Jim
I believe COLite was operating pre Gordon B. When CO got the competent management CO Lite was discontinued ASAP.
Aren't you contradicting yourslef?
"If an airline with good, strong management like Continental cannot make a lowfare subsidiary work, it shows it is a bad idea."
C-scale? What scale would you consider your wages now?