What's new

US flights affected by GLA vehicle attack?

Are you suggesting that rather than an attack it was instead sorta like a spin off of running the Olympic Torch to the stadium befor the games begin?

Why would a rational person even think "attack"? What evidence do you possess? Speculation from someone paid to create controversy like a cable anchor?

BTW, read what I said. I never said downtown London was not an "attack". I believe I implied that one should wait for all the evidence before making a judgement. Just look at any of the CSI series, the initial judgement is almost always wrong, for those with the 2+ digit intellect to actually follow a script.

So far, for all you know, the cars might have been delivered by Alfred E. Neuman. Who could prove you wrong, at this point?
 
Why would a rational person even think "attack"? What evidence do you possess? Speculation from someone paid to create controversy like a cable anchor?

BTW, read what I said. I never said downtown London was not an "attack". I believe I implied that one should wait for all the evidence before making a judgement. Just look at any of the CSI series, the initial judgement is almost always wrong, for those with the 2+ digit intellect to actually follow a script.

So far, for all you know, the cars might have been delivered by Alfred E. Neuman. Who could prove you wrong, at this point?

Does that mean you don't think it is like the Olympic Torch thing? :unsure:
 
Flt to GLA on 1 Jul and return on 2 JUL are being cancelled as a precaution.
 
I got out of the cab and walked thru the frame to board GLA-PHL like 3 days ago. Tad bit unnerving.
 
Flt to GLA on 1 Jul and return on 2 JUL are being cancelled as a precaution.
Were they able to use this plane and crew move some of the weather delayed passangers still waiting at the Northeast Airports?
 
I think we still have a crew stuck over in GLA.. Our tkt counter in GLA took a direct hit with the fire that the suv started... Agents were not there, and are ok..
 
I think we still have a crew stuck over in GLA.. Our tkt counter in GLA took a direct hit with the fire that the suv started... Agents were not there, and are ok..

Unless they moved it, the US ticket counter seems to be around the corner from where the guys parked their car.


Also, since the UK people seem to keep their composure a lot better than most "Merikans", here is an article that pretty well says it was all much ado about nothing;

<http://tinyurl.com/2wy9o6>

Sheesh, guys and gals. Get a grip.
 
Unless they moved it, the US ticket counter seems to be around the corner from where the guys parked their car.
Also, since the UK people seem to keep their composure a lot better than most "Merikans", here is an article that pretty well says it was all much ado about nothing;

<http://tinyurl.com/2wy9o6>

Sheesh, guys and gals. Get a grip.

If you read the accounts of the two chaps who grabbed the one guy, I'd say they handled it a lot better than most yanks would have (essentially pounded on the guy to keep him down until the cops and fire brigade rolled up).

Bravo.
 
If you read the accounts of the two chaps who grabbed the one guy, I'd say they handled it a lot better than most yanks would have (essentially pounded on the guy to keep him down until the cops and fire brigade rolled up).

Bravo.

So, the cops, and those "chaps" were indeed cops, "pounded on the guy"? Wrong.

Both ran into the arms of cops. They did not try to run away. Read the official report and try to avoid faux news, the neo-con fantasyland of nazis. Even Sky-News likes bright, flashy colors and not much substance.

and I agree, the Cheney/Bush yanks are pretty pathetic when it comes to defense. Heck, I'd sooner have a "dirty hippie type" defending me than those pathetically greedy bastards.
 
So, the cops, and those "chaps" were indeed cops, "pounded on the guy"? Wrong.

Both ran into the arms of cops. They did not try to run away. Read the official report and try to avoid faux news, the neo-con fantasyland of nazis. Even Sky-News likes bright, flashy colors and not much substance.

Really? So, CNN, the Times, the BBC, and every person who has confirmed it (including the bobbies in question) don't believe what this guy said and did? Or, if the times is not your speed (too "neo-con," if that's possible for a british rag), would The Guardian's account suffice?

Try to remove the head from it's firm place in the cranium before engaging the keyboard and throwing out terms like "neo-con" and "faux news."
 

Latest posts

Back
Top