Trying to figure out how much this place is worth?Does anyone know exactly why the VP's came to Tulsa?
Trying to figure out how much this place is worth?
That was bantied about some time ago and actually sounds rather pleasant - that might be one way to be rid of the TWU before they cost us more.Boeing is looking for a partner and facility to do warranty work!
Remember that Oklahoma is a Right to Work. The Boeing issue wth South Carolina and the 787 assenbly plant could cause some problems for the TWU, however it would give the TWU an excuse.That was bantied about some time ago and actually sounds rather pleasant - that might be one way to be rid of the TWU before they cost us more.
I can't imagine what it would be like to work somewhere that had a real union.
That was bantied about some time ago and actually sounds rather pleasant - that might be one way to be rid of the TWU before they cost us more.
I can't imagine what it would be like to work somewhere that had a real union.
It all would depend on how any deal is structured.I may be wrong, but I don't think selection of AA as a warranty partner (Gold Care?) has anything to do with a Boeing takeover of TULE or removal of the TWU or the replacement with any Boeing union. It's just Boeing selecting certain MROs as preferred providers to perform warranty work on the 787. Boeing ain't looking to buy MROs.
Yeah - which of the 1200?Does anyone know exactly why the VP's came to Tulsa?
Who says they're looking to BUY an MRO....I may be wrong, but I don't think selection of AA as a warranty partner (Gold Care?) has anything to do with a Boeing takeover of TULE or removal of the TWU or the replacement with any Boeing union. It's just Boeing selecting certain MROs as preferred providers to perform warranty work on the 787. Boeing ain't looking to buy MROs.
Does anyone know exactly why the VP's came to Tulsa?
Who says they're looking to BUY an MRO....
They can work a deal out with AA similar to the TAESL one....
For the record Frank, the compAAny can blame no one but themselves for all the "structure" screwups, as they're the ones who made all systems/structure mechanics "generals". Those of us in A/O know who should not be issued air tools.AAA TULE is not an MRO - management from Centrepork on down the food chain has torpedoed any and all attempts at this - some of the mechanics did a pretty good job to themselves also by the constant screw-ups (one aircraft I remember had over 200 mislocated holes in the structure) during the 737 winglet installations. I know because I was one of those in Tool & Die that had to fix the mechanics' mistakes. I'd have made the wankers fix their own problems or sent them home.
Sorry, but I don't see Boeing investing in a MRO or doing a JV when there are dozens of providers who are better financed and falling over themselves to get the Gold Care seal of approval.
That's not to say the option hasn't been thought of - if Boeing's management is partially worth its salt (unlike ours) they've considered ways to offer such an option.IIRC, the only reason Rolls did the JV was to be able to service power-by-the-hour contracts. Boeing doesn't really offer that option as far as I know.