Just about anyone could have done better. Value of a contractual item is established at the time it is negotiated. You don't allow a company in concessionary talks to arbitrarily assign an deflated number to up the anti. Also, no credit was sought for the loss of 6000 jobs. Savings? You think? There were no efforts to negotiate "me too", "snap back", or "crawl back" provisions. When BK is on the table AND the unions are willing to "help", the Company should be saying "thank you" not "screw you". The APFA should have never allowed the company to dictate WHICH contractual items were up for discussion. There were alternate agreements that were never presented, which would have saved jobs. John Ward GAVE away furlough pay because he was ticked off that the company gave pay seniority to the acquired f/as. Something about the "killer B" vs senior women...lol And most harmful of all was an illegal extending of the vote, plus the promise of a revote that lost the respect of most.
TH-B has been relatively benign compared to the Ward atrocities. She has done far less "harm" in the long run. John Ward losr 1/4th of his membership without blinking an eye.
Bottom line: When you're ASKING for financial help from your employees, and they are WILLING to help, a prepared union controls the negotiations.( or you walk out of the talks until the company is ready to negotiate in good faith) You don't play games seeking concessions for no cost or cost neutral, quality of life enhancements that could have been put in place FOR the concessions. But then Ward caved and the rest is either in court or history.
Don't discount the vote of the "deminished"...They vote. There is no apathy and as the most junior will be rallying other junior f/as for a fair share of "the pie". (or choice of leadership) Hopefully, there will be a strong dark horse that will sweep the election. Yeah right,