(approx.) 200,000 jobs created in June, as Unemployee rate continues to Drop !

I am not surprised that this come from our resident Ronulan. How is his plan working out? How about Rand?

The simple fact is that it is morally wrong and an affront to Liberty to force an Individual to purchase any good or service. The program is a TAX. For years I never wore a seat belt. WHY? because the government told me I had to. It's my car, paid for with my money. YES, I decided the risk outweighed the principle.

I'm about 6 years from retirement and I've begun my search for a place to retire as an expat rather then subject myself to the loss of individual Liberty.

You might now agree with us Paulbots but you can NEVER unhear what we say,
 
That right there is funny as chit.

Hey at least I'm honest. Unlike Obama Lama Ding Dong who couldn't find his ass with both hands in a phone booth with a flashlight..

U-6 is still at 16.3%, chew on that as the Empty suit says "The Private Sector is doing fine" What a stone cold Jackass. Watch what happens as states refuse to implement his socialist, liberty robbing Tax scheme.. Something like 20 states already have said they would not implement parts of the scam. It will collapse under the weight of it's cost as it will save NOTHING.

Then there is the issue of the "Refuseniks" who will rise up and just say NO! His dingbat plan is doomed to failure. He has never had to make a payroll in his life and it shows.. What will they do? Put sick people in jail? Throw them on the street to die?

Then wait until the free market figures out the scam. Look out Treasury cause you'll have to print a whole lot of money to cover the cost of this debacle.

Ever notice that in multiple thousands of pages there is no tort reform? Ask yourself why? Give up? One of Obama's biggest contributors in 2008 was the Trial Lawyers Association. And the Libtards complain about the Koch Brothers! What hypocrites.
 
Guess all the peeps, 52%, who don't pay taxes and don't buy insurance will have to be thrown in jail , as there is no way for Nobamas 16,000 "NEW" IRS agents to "Enforce" penalty's on said non-tax payers !

Oh.........that is if they don't fall into the "Gimme Free Stuff" category !
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Of course you are a parroting some tired, flat out lies once again. Go ahead and provide us all with the quote form "page 113, line 22".

This is from Forbes.com:

"Of all the many gripes and complaints directed my way when it comes to the Affordable Care Act, the one that appears to tick people off the most is a widespread belief that Congress has carved out some exemptions for themselves that provide our elected representatives with cushy health insurance benefitsi while the rest of us are left to experience diminishing coverage from employers or, come 2014, enter the unknown world of state run health insurance exchanges.

I certainly understand why people believe that this injustice is taking place right under their noses. Conservative media has told them repeatedly, and in no uncertain terms, that this is the trick being played on them by the privileged and powerful.

It’s a great story – but it certainly is not the true story.

Indeed, you may be surprised to learn that once the lion’s share of the ACA kicks in on January 1, 2014, not only are Members of Congress and their staff obligated to play by the same rules as the rest of us, they will actually be required to follow a more restrictive path to their health insurance than you and I.

The false narrative suggesting that Congress gave themselves a special deal appears to have begun with John Fund of the Wall Street Journal who wrote,

As the U.S. Office of Personnel Management notes, Members of Congress “enjoy the widest selection of health plans in the country.” According to page 114 of the Kennedy bill, a similar array of choices would not be available to other Americans in the future. Instead, they would be shunted into health insurance plans under the straightjacket of whatever the government decides is a “basic” plan.

The goal would be to restrict care for the general public in order to control costs, while making sure Congress gets the gold-plated attention it’s accustomed to. Ultimately, the rest of us would be asked to trade a private insurance company as gatekeeper for a government gatekeeper. The difference, of course, is that most of us can fire our insurance gatekeeper. Just try to do that once the government fills that role.

This line of bull was peddled to an even larger audience by Sean Hannity, a man who never met a fact that he wasn’t willing to ignore while making up a new one to better suit his purpose. During Hannity’s Fox News program of March 24, 2010, Hannity stated, without reservation, that that Members of Congress and their staff were exempt from the requirements of the Affordable Care Act.

So, here’s the real deal –As things currently stand, Members of Congress and their staff, until 2014, will continue to participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). This program, considered among the best in the nation, allows federal employees- including Members of Congress and their staff- to choose from a wide range of health plans and select the one that best suits their needs. Note that the current plan is neither ‘government’ insurance, ‘free’ insurance nor any other sort of sweet deal that the public has been led to believe is the case. The federal employee’s program involves private insurance policies with premiums, deductibles, co-pays, etc.

Here’s the surprise – come 2014, when the lion’s share of the ACA provisions come on line, Members of Congress and their staff will be required to buy their health insurance on an exchange. In fact, their choices will be even more limited than our own. While it is expected that some 24 million people will elect to purchase their health care policy on a state run exchange, we are not required by law to do so. Members of Congress and their staff, however, must buy their insurance in this way.

Section 1312 of the Affordable Care Act reads as follows:

(D) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IN THE EXCHANGE.-

(i) REQUIREMENT.-Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the effective date of this subtitle, the only health plans that the Federal Government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff with respect to their service as a Member of Congress or congressional staff shall be health plans that are-

(I) created under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act); or

(II) offered through an Exchange established under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act).

(ii) DEFINITIONS.-In this section:

(I) MEMBER OF CONGRESS.-The term ”Member of Congress” means any member of the House of Representatives or the Senate.

(II) CONGRESSIONAL STAFF.-The term ”congressional staff” means all full-time and part-time employees employed by the official office of a Member of Congress, whether in Washington, DC or outside of Washington, DC.

Despite what Sean Hannity and friends would like you to believe, once we hit 2014, Members of Congress and their staff will be shopping in the same state based health care exchanges that many average Americans will be checking out for the best deals and plans available.

So, you may now cross this complaint off of your “Why I Hate Obamacare” list and see if you can come up with something based in reality. And, when you do, feel free to send them in to me and we can take a look at whether the facts match the complaints.

You might be surprised."

I am not surprised that this come from our resident Ronulan. How is his plan working out? How about Rand?

Wonder how long it will take for them to cut an amendment?
And I bet they read it this time.
 
As far as gas prices, they are based on National Average. In my area, they never fell below $2.50, and never went over $3.50.
 
Gas prices in July 2008 were over $4 a gallon, You can babble all you want, but it won't change that fact.

The National Avg. Price of Gas hit a high or $4.12/gal in June of 'o8 and dropped to a low of $1.61/Gal in late December of '08. That would be a total of 6 months.

So if I use 10 gallons of Gas per week for 26 weeks, Bush increased my cost of going to work by $16.20/wk times 26 weeks or $412.20. (This assumes that gas was $4.12/gal the entire 26 weeks (which it wasn't, but I want to be fair)

The price of gas rose steadily under Obama from a low of $1.84 on inauguration Day to a high of 3.87 and has settled in around $3.50/gal on average the last 24 months. Prior to the spike under bush gas was around $2.50. So let's do the rest of the math.

10 Gallon per week @ $3.50 x 104 weeks = $3,640.00 in gas. The baseline in both examples is $2.50. Under Obama I've paid $1,040 above the baseline, while under Bush I paid only $421.20 above the baseline. (Note: I gave the Empty Suit a break on the price of gas as it spiked to $3.89 for a substantial period of time, far longer then under Bush)

Take the above and add a 57% increase in food, plus an even higher increase for clothing and steadily declining wages and you can make a case that a Harp Seal would make a better POTUS.
 
Whats all this Fuss about auto Insurance ?
I dont have auto Insurance, and I'm driving legally.
(Must be that 'LIVE FREE OR DIE" stuff we have here in New Hampshire)
 
Good news for the US Economy as approx. 200,000 news jobs were created in June, And, as the National unemployement rate ...slowly-but-Steadily inches towards the under 8% mark.
(currect rate @ 8.1%, DOWN from last month)

Great time for this to be occuring as we head towards the Presidential Election !

(Summarizing,..........Obam"NEY" care Constitutional !.............Unemployment rate VERY near -8%, Gas prices continuing to FALL etc.)
Oh The JOY !!!!

Note : Stay tuned for 'southwind's NEGATIVISM on these Issues !!


LEAN FORWARD

BEND OVER DUDE IT DON'T GET ANY BETTER THAN THIS:

crying-democrats.gif


Unemployment Rate Dropped In Every State That Elected A Republican Gov. In 2010
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person