Do You Want To Re- Elect Bush For Presendent!

delldude said:
...the president's "operatives had somehow arranged for their own audio feed, they refused to say how..."
Click to expand...
The spirit of the Watergate burglars is alive and well in the Republican Party.
 
Veritas said:
The spirit of the Watergate burglars is alive and well in the Republican Party.
Click to expand...
Since the creation of the so-called 'Patriot Act', the actions of the Watergate burglars have been virtually legalized. Section 213 allows 'Sneak and Peek" searches and sections 215 and 505 allow unrestricted access to medical, financial, library and consumer records, so now the burglars would be unnecessary - the FBI could do it for them.

Nixon would be so proud.
 
The article is an op/ed based on opinion.Apparently just like the presidents reasons for going to war with Iraq. I'll wait for the facts. Like the FACT that Iran is everything they claimed Iraq was. Maybe Bush misread Iran for Iraq, If he read anything at all. dont want to read a 90 page report before committing troops to thier death.Might seem ELITEST. Just give me the cliff notes.
 
sentrido said:
The article is an op/ed based on opinion.Apparently just like the presidents reasons for going to war with Iraq. I'll wait for the facts. Like the FACT that Iran is everything they claimed Iraq was. Maybe Bush misread Iran for Iraq, If he read anything at all. dont want to read a 90 page report before committing troops to thier death.Might seem ELITEST. Just give me the cliff notes.
Click to expand...
dont want to read a 90 page report before committing troops to thier death.
Click to expand...
maybe he learned that trick from congress??
"psst...hey...whats in this bill we're voting on right now?"
 
Giving Authority is not the same as making the decision. The FAA gives you the authority to sighn off on a repair, they dont make you do it.

Dont show that picture to Arnold, It looks like his kinda "girly man". :wub:
 
The Arabian Candidate

July 20, 2004
OP-ED COLUMNIST
The Arabian Candidate
By PAUL KRUGMAN

In the original version of "The Manchurian Candidate," Senator John Iselin, whom Chinese agents are plotting to put in the White House, is a right-wing demagogue modeled on Senator Joseph McCarthy. As Roger Ebert wrote, the plan is to "use anticommunist hysteria as a cover for a communist takeover."

The movie doesn't say what Iselin would have done if the plot had succeeded. Presumably, however, he wouldn't have openly turned traitor. Instead, he would have used his position to undermine national security, while posing as America's staunchest defender against communist evil.

So let's imagine an update - not the remake with Denzel Washington, which I haven't seen, but my own version. This time the enemies would be Islamic fanatics, who install as their puppet president a demagogue who poses as the nation's defender against terrorist evildoers.

The Arabian candidate wouldn't openly help terrorists. Instead, he would serve their cause while pretending to be their enemy.

After an attack, he would strike back at the terrorist base, a necessary action to preserve his image of toughness, but botch the follow-up, allowing the terrorist leaders to escape. Once the public's attention shifted, he would systematically squander the military victory: committing too few soldiers, reneging on promises of economic aid. Soon, warlords would once again rule most of the country, the heroin trade would be booming, and terrorist allies would make a comeback.

Meanwhile, he would lead America into a war against a country that posed no imminent threat. He would insinuate, without saying anything literally false, that it was somehow responsible for the terrorist attack. This unnecessary war would alienate our allies and tie down a large part of our military. At the same time, the Arabian candidate would neglect the pursuit of those who attacked us, and do nothing about regimes that really shelter anti-American terrorists and really are building nuclear weapons.

Again, he would take care to squander a military victory. The Arabian candidate and his co-conspirators would block all planning for the war's aftermath; they would arrange for our army to allow looters to destroy much of the country's infrastructure. Then they would disband the defeated regime's army, turning hundreds of thousands of trained soldiers into disgruntled potential insurgents.

After this it would be easy to sabotage the occupied country's reconstruction, simply by failing to spend aid funds or rein in cronyism and corruption. Power outages, overflowing sewage and unemployment would swell the ranks of our enemies.

Who knows? The Arabian candidate might even be able to deprive America of the moral high ground, no mean trick when our enemies are mass murderers, by creating a climate in which U.S. guards torture, humiliate and starve prisoners, most of them innocent or guilty of only petty crimes.

At home, the Arabian candidate would leave the nation vulnerable, doing almost nothing to secure ports, chemical plants and other potential targets. He would stonewall investigations into why the initial terrorist attack succeeded. And by repeatedly issuing vague terror warnings obviously timed to drown out unfavorable political news, his officials would ensure public indifference if and when a real threat is announced.

Last but not least, by blatantly exploiting the terrorist threat for personal political gain, he would undermine the nation's unity in the face of its enemies, sowing suspicion about the government's motives.

O.K., end of conceit. President Bush isn't actually an Al Qaeda mole, with Dick Cheney his controller. Mr. Bush's "war on terror" has, however, played with eerie perfection into Osama bin Laden's hands - while Mr. Bush's supporters, impressed by his tough talk, see him as America's champion against the evildoers.

Last week, Republican officials in Kentucky applauded bumper stickers distributed at G.O.P. offices that read, "Kerry is bin Laden's man/Bush is mine." Administration officials haven't gone that far, but when Tom Ridge offered a specifics-free warning about a terrorist attack timed to "disrupt our democratic process," many people thought he was implying that Al Qaeda wants George Bush to lose. In reality, all infidels probably look alike to the terrorists, but if they do have a preference, nothing in Mr. Bush's record would make them unhappy at the prospect of four more years.
Click to expand...
 
delldude said:
COUNTED CHICKENS TOO FAST??[/URL]
Click to expand...
I don't believe so. First, this is just the latest in a looooong string of WMD's that were found. Of course, the left just conviently just keeps ignoring them.

There were the shels loaded with sarin gas, capable of killing up to 20,000 people. There were others as well. An forget the fact that that was not the only reason or even the main reason for the war.

I do believe that this will be proven out to be true. There were too many details for it not to be. Not that this will convince anyone, especially those that 3 years ago were spouting off that Iraq had these weapons in the first place, that they actually exist.
 
FredF said:
I don't believe so. First, this is just the latest in a looooong string of WMD's that were found. Of course, the left just conviently just keeps ignoring them.

There were the shels loaded with sarin gas, capable of killing up to 20,000 people. There were others as well. An forget the fact that that was not the only reason or even the main reason for the war.

I do believe that this will be proven out to be true. There were too many details for it not to be. Not that this will convince anyone, especially those that 3 years ago were spouting off that Iraq had these weapons in the first place, that they actually exist.
Click to expand...
i agree but the disclaimer popped up so quick.
(don't forget about that jolly bunch that got caught in jordan with the sarin capable of wacking 80,000 brother arabs)
don't worry about me...when i go to KFC i always order " right wings".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Do You Know What Clinton's Doing?
Replies
2
Views
819
RJcasualty
RJcasualty
Ms Tree
Texas judge warns of civil war if Obama is re-elected
3 4 5
Replies
61
Views
6K
xUT
xUT
N
Hollywood...to re-make old movie
Replies
2
Views
704
NewHampshire Black Bears
N
delldude
Bush lost House/Senate
Replies
1
Views
745
rjh
R
R
Pilot jokes...
Replies
2
Views
1K
Commodore64
C

Latest posts

Back
Top